Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

0.74s

  • International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

    388 A.2d 36 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1978

    Rich v. Sills, supra at 922 . … For example, in Bussie v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Chamness v. McHugh

    814 F. Supp. 2d 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2011

    Cir. 2006); Cone, 223 F.3d at 793; Hardy v. McHugh, 692 F. Supp. 2d 76, 80 (D.D.C. 2010). Indeed, “[m]ilitary boards are entitled to even greater deference than civilian administrative agencies.” Escobedo v. … When reviewing these decisions, the Court’s function “is not to serve as a super correction board that reweighs the evidence.” Epstein v. Geren, 539 F. Supp. 2d. 267, 275 (D.D.C. 2008).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Application of Stephens-Adamson Mfg. Co.

    262 F. 635 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1920

    And the following words have been upheld: “Holeproof,” as applied to hosiery (Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. Wallach Bros., 172 Fed. 859 , 97 C. C. A. 263 ); “Cream,” as applied to rolled oats (Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. … C.] 26 Fed. 576 ); and many others, equally suggestive, referred to in 'the last case, where the opinion is by Judge Brown, afterwards Mr. Justice Brown of the Supreme Court of the United States.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Johnson

    48 A.3d 170 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 2012

    turpitude. 1 We adopt the Board’s unopposed recommendation. … Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255, 268 , 112 S.Ct. 1881 , 119 L.Ed.2d 57 (1992).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lopiccolo v. American University

    840 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 5, 2012

    See id.; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Radosti v. Envision EMI, LLC, 717 F. Supp. 2d 37, 59 (D.D.C. 2010); Lacey v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In re McBride

    578 A.2d 1102 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1990

    United States v. Kegler, 724 F.2d 190 (D.C.Cir.1984). A leading opinion in this jurisdiction is United States v. Raper, 676 F.2d 841 (D.C. Cir.1982). … E.g., Nye and Nissen v. United States, 336 U.S. 613, 619 , 69 S.Ct. 766, 769 , 93 L.Ed. 919 (1949); United States v. Staten, 581 F.2d 878, 887 (D.C.Cir.1978); United States v. Holder, 566 F.2d 617, 619 (8th Cir.1977).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Buzzfeed Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2024

    Brown, B. Brown, and Schwartz). See Pl.’s Cross-Mot. at 5–8. … Brown and R. Brown. Id. ¶¶ 8–9. AUSA Schwartz stated that he did not have responsive records. Id. ¶ 9.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The American Bottling Company v. NLRB

    992 F.3d 1129 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 2021

    Cir. 1987) (quoting NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 (1946)). Board determinations regarding such matters are therefore “rarely to be disturbed,” South Prairie Constr. Co. v. … Ctr. v. NLRB, 833 F.3d 202, 206 (D.C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Wood Ex Rel. United States v. American Institute in Taiwan

    286 F.3d 526 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 2002

    Arguing that Congress intended the clause to apply to the Institute, Wood points to Sloan Shipyards v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 258 U.S. 549 (1922). … See, e.g., Brown v. INS, 775 F.2d 383, 388 (D.C. Cir. 1985).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    533 F.3d 820 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 2008

    Co. v. FERC, 295 F.3d 1, 10 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Comm’n v. FERC, 522 F.3d 378, 398 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Scurry

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 5, 2012

    Katz v. … Brown’s Mot. 3 (citing United States v. Feliz, 20 F. Supp. 2d 97, 104 (D. Me. 1998); United States v. Weaver, 99 F.3d 1372, 1378 (6th Cir. 1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Turlock Irrigation District v. FERC

    36 F.4th 1179 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 17, 2022

    FERC distinguished the California Board’s denials without prejudice from Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, 913 F.3d 1099 (D.C. … Each time the California Board denied certification, the Board “act[ed]” within the meaning of section 401(a)(1). See N.Y. State Dep’t of Env’t Conservation v. FERC, 884 F.3d 450, 456 (2d Cir. 2018); N.Y.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Ardent, Inc.

    305 B.R. 133 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2003

    United States (In re Carlson), 126 F.3d 915, 921-22 (7th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1060 , 118 S.Ct. 1388 , 140 L.Ed.2d 647 (1998); Franchise Tax Board of Calif. v. … MacFarlane (In re MacFarlane), 83 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1115 , 117 S.Ct. 1243 , 137 L.Ed.2d 326 (1997); Brown v. IRS (In re Brown), 82 F.3d 801, 805 (8th Cir. 1996); Juniper Dev. Group v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Abbott GmbH & Co. KG v. Yeda Research & Development, Co.

    576 F. Supp. 2d 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2008

    P’ship v. Mass. Hous. Fin. … Scimed v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Wilkie

    320 F. Supp. 3d 191 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 2018

    Browning v. Clinton , 292 F.3d 235 , 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). I. Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … Fermin v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. England

    234 F.R.D. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2006

    See, e.g., Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U.S. 345, 360 , 102 S.Ct. 1103 , 71 L.Ed.2d 199 (1982); St. Regis Paper Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 208, 218 , 82 S.Ct. 289 , 7 L.Ed.2d 240 (1961); Friedman v. … See ICG Commc’ns, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Downing v. United States

    434 A.2d 409 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1981

    Hallman v. United States, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 215 (1979); Middleton v. United States, D.C. … Harling v. United States, D.C.App., 382 A.2d 845, 847 (1978).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Temple University Hospital v. NLRB

    39 F.4th 743 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 2022

    Ass’n v. NLRB, 499 U.S. 606, 608, 615–17 (1991). … Hammontree v. NLRB, 925 F.2d 1486, 1491–92 (D.C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shifrin v. Wilson

    412 F. Supp. 1282 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1976

    Brown, 398 F.Supp. 155 (N.D.Ill.1975); Maybanks v. Ingraham, 378 F.Supp. 913 (D.C.Pa.1974); Dahl v. City of Palo Alto, 372 F.Supp. 647 (N.D.Cal.1974). … Williams v. Brown, supra, 398 F.Supp. at 160 .

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Washington v. United States

    343 A.2d 560 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1975

    Brown's testimony was recorded and preserved. … See United States v. Person, supra .

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.