Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.74s
International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
388 A.2d 36 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1978
Rich v. Sills, supra at 922 . … For example, in Bussie v.
Cited 24 timesPublished814 F. Supp. 2d 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2011
Cir. 2006); Cone, 223 F.3d at 793; Hardy v. McHugh, 692 F. Supp. 2d 76, 80 (D.D.C. 2010). Indeed, “[m]ilitary boards are entitled to even greater deference than civilian administrative agencies.” Escobedo v. … When reviewing these decisions, the Court’s function “is not to serve as a super correction board that reweighs the evidence.” Epstein v. Geren, 539 F. Supp. 2d. 267, 275 (D.D.C. 2008).
Cited 9 timesPublishedApplication of Stephens-Adamson Mfg. Co.
262 F. 635 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1920
And the following words have been upheld: “Holeproof,” as applied to hosiery (Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. Wallach Bros., 172 Fed. 859 , 97 C. C. A. 263 ); “Cream,” as applied to rolled oats (Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. … C.] 26 Fed. 576 ); and many others, equally suggestive, referred to in 'the last case, where the opinion is by Judge Brown, afterwards Mr. Justice Brown of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Cited 3 timesPublished48 A.3d 170 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 2012
turpitude. 1 We adopt the Board’s unopposed recommendation. … Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255, 268 , 112 S.Ct. 1881 , 119 L.Ed.2d 57 (1992).
Cited 8 timesPublishedLopiccolo v. American University
840 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 5, 2012
See id.; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Radosti v. Envision EMI, LLC, 717 F. Supp. 2d 37, 59 (D.D.C. 2010); Lacey v.
Cited 13 timesPublished578 A.2d 1102 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1990
United States v. Kegler, 724 F.2d 190 (D.C.Cir.1984). A leading opinion in this jurisdiction is United States v. Raper, 676 F.2d 841 (D.C. Cir.1982). … E.g., Nye and Nissen v. United States, 336 U.S. 613, 619 , 69 S.Ct. 766, 769 , 93 L.Ed. 919 (1949); United States v. Staten, 581 F.2d 878, 887 (D.C.Cir.1978); United States v. Holder, 566 F.2d 617, 619 (8th Cir.1977).
Cited 3 timesPublishedBuzzfeed Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2024
Brown, B. Brown, and Schwartz). See Pl.’s Cross-Mot. at 5–8. … Brown and R. Brown. Id. ¶¶ 8–9. AUSA Schwartz stated that he did not have responsive records. Id. ¶ 9.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThe American Bottling Company v. NLRB
992 F.3d 1129 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 2021
Cir. 1987) (quoting NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 (1946)). Board determinations regarding such matters are therefore “rarely to be disturbed,” South Prairie Constr. Co. v. … Ctr. v. NLRB, 833 F.3d 202, 206 (D.C.
Cited 6 timesPublishedWood Ex Rel. United States v. American Institute in Taiwan
286 F.3d 526 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 2002
Arguing that Congress intended the clause to apply to the Institute, Wood points to Sloan Shipyards v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 258 U.S. 549 (1922). … See, e.g., Brown v. INS, 775 F.2d 383, 388 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
Cited 11 timesPublishedPacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
533 F.3d 820 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 2008
Co. v. FERC, 295 F.3d 1, 10 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Comm’n v. FERC, 522 F.3d 378, 398 (D.C. Cir. 2008).
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Sep 5, 2012
Katz v. … Brown’s Mot. 3 (citing United States v. Feliz, 20 F. Supp. 2d 97, 104 (D. Me. 1998); United States v. Weaver, 99 F.3d 1372, 1378 (6th Cir. 1996).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTurlock Irrigation District v. FERC
36 F.4th 1179 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 17, 2022
FERC distinguished the California Board’s denials without prejudice from Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, 913 F.3d 1099 (D.C. … Each time the California Board denied certification, the Board “act[ed]” within the meaning of section 401(a)(1). See N.Y. State Dep’t of Env’t Conservation v. FERC, 884 F.3d 450, 456 (2d Cir. 2018); N.Y.
Cited 7 timesPublished305 B.R. 133 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2003
United States (In re Carlson), 126 F.3d 915, 921-22 (7th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1060 , 118 S.Ct. 1388 , 140 L.Ed.2d 647 (1998); Franchise Tax Board of Calif. v. … MacFarlane (In re MacFarlane), 83 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1115 , 117 S.Ct. 1243 , 137 L.Ed.2d 326 (1997); Brown v. IRS (In re Brown), 82 F.3d 801, 805 (8th Cir. 1996); Juniper Dev. Group v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAbbott GmbH & Co. KG v. Yeda Research & Development, Co.
576 F. Supp. 2d 44 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2008
P’ship v. Mass. Hous. Fin. … Scimed v.
Cited 14 timesPublished320 F. Supp. 3d 191 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 2018
Browning v. Clinton , 292 F.3d 235 , 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). I. Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … Fermin v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedChaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. England
234 F.R.D. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2006
See, e.g., Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U.S. 345, 360 , 102 S.Ct. 1103 , 71 L.Ed.2d 199 (1982); St. Regis Paper Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 208, 218 , 82 S.Ct. 289 , 7 L.Ed.2d 240 (1961); Friedman v. … See ICG Commc’ns, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished434 A.2d 409 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1981
Hallman v. United States, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 215 (1979); Middleton v. United States, D.C. … Harling v. United States, D.C.App., 382 A.2d 845, 847 (1978).
Cited 4 timesPublishedTemple University Hospital v. NLRB
39 F.4th 743 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 2022
Ass’n v. NLRB, 499 U.S. 606, 608, 615–17 (1991). … Hammontree v. NLRB, 925 F.2d 1486, 1491–92 (D.C.
Cited 1 timesPublished412 F. Supp. 1282 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1976
Brown, 398 F.Supp. 155 (N.D.Ill.1975); Maybanks v. Ingraham, 378 F.Supp. 913 (D.C.Pa.1974); Dahl v. City of Palo Alto, 372 F.Supp. 647 (N.D.Cal.1974). … Williams v. Brown, supra, 398 F.Supp. at 160 .
Cited 30 timesPublished343 A.2d 560 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1975
Brown's testimony was recorded and preserved. … See United States v. Person, supra .
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna