Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

5.29s

  • Brown v. Jarvis

    22 Tenn. App. 394 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 9, 1938

    Wright v. Dorman, 155 Tenn., 189, 194 , 291 S. W., 1064 . … Leach v. Cowan, 125 Tenn., 182, 203 , 140 S. W., 1070 , 1076, Ann. Cas. 1913C, 188; Matlock v. Rice, 6 Heisk., 33, 38 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Edward Brown

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 19, 2014

    State v. Dorantes, 331 S.W.3d 370, 379 (Tenn. 2011) (quoting State v. Hanson, 279 S.W.3d 265, 275 (Tenn. 2009)). … State v. Banks, 564 S.W.2d 947, 949 (Tenn. 1978); State v. Lacy, 983 S.W.2d 686, 694 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Brown v. Polk County

    165 Tenn. 196 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1932

    L., 579; Board of Viola v. Board of Warren County, 160 Tenn., 351 . … See State v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Aydlett

    12 Tenn. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 26, 1930

    Brown and “ ‘Fred S. … . & G., 744, 53 English Ch., 583; Burwell v. Cawood, 2 Howard, 560 , 11 L. Ed., 378 ; Smith v. Ayer, 11 Otto, 320 , 25 L. Ed., 955 ; Lovell v. Schofield, 217 Fed., 708 ; Lucht v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pharr v. Pension Board

    42 Tenn. App. 625 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 26, 1956

    W. 1061 , and Shelby County v. Six Judges, 1875, 3 Tenn. Cas. Shannon 508, 509, are cited by the Pension Board and relied on heavily in support of their contention. … Ransom v. Rutherford County, 123 Tenn. 1 , 130 S. W. 1057 , Ann. Cas. 1912B, 1356; Hill v. Roberts, 142 Tenn. 215 , 217 S. W. 826 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Byrd v. Hall

    847 S.W.2d 208 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1993

    See Hamrick v. … Knoxville Traction Co. v. Brown, 115 Tenn. 323, 331 , 89 S.W. 319 , 321 (1905); Rollins v. Winn Dixie, 780 S.W.2d 765, 767 (Tenn.App.1989); Schwarzer, 139 F.R.D. at 476.

    Cited 2,028 timesPublished
  • Ewayna Mechelle Brown v. Bruce Edward Thomas

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 12, 2026

    02/12/2026 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 5, 2026 EWAYNA MECHELLE BROWN v. … See Case v. Shelby County Civil Service Merit Board, 98 S.W.3d 167, 175 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). Thus, the motions were not heard because Wife failed to set them for hearing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wilson

    13 Tenn. App. 255 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 13, 1931

    Anderson v. Read, 2 Overton, 205; Babson v. Tinsley, 4 Higgins, 607. But passing this, the defendants admit tliat plaintiff did the work painting the house. … Counsel for defendants insist that Phillips v. Rooker, 134 Tenn., 457 , 184 S. W. 12 , is directly in point.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shamarion J. Brown v. State of Tennessee

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 2, 2026

    BROWN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-25-109 Joseph T. … Brown. Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General and Reporter; Kelly M. Telfeyan, Assistant Attorney General; Jody S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Darren Brown v. State of Tennessee

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 5, 2013

    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 6, 2013 DARREN BROWN v. … See State v. Darren Brown, No. W2008-01866-CCA-R3-CD, 2010 WL 22812 (Tenn. Crim. App. Jan. 5, 2010). The Tennessee Supreme Court denied Petitioner’s Application for Permission to Appeal on April 14, 2010.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McKee v. Board of Elections

    173 Tenn. 276 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 27, 1938

    In Staples v. Brown, 113 Tenn., 639 , at page 646, 85 S. … Rhea County v. White, 163 Tenn., 388 , 43 S. W. (2d), 375 ; Staples v. Brown, supra, at page 655, 85 S. W., 254 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Bobby Brown

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · May 30, 2000

    W hen they arrived in C ov ington, they encountered Sm ith, who approached the v an on foot. T he D efendant parked the v an and got out, leaving A dam s ins ide t he v an. … M cB ee v . State , 372 S .W .2d 173, 176 (T enn. 1963); see also S tate v. E v ans, 838 S .W .2d 185, 191 (T enn. 1992) (citing S tate v . G race, 493 S.W .2d 474, 476 (T enn. 1976), and S tate v .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Greene v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    72 F. Supp. 2d 882 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 15, 1999

    See Bowman v. … See Ray by Holman v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Board of Commissioners

    204 Tenn. 298 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1958

    Reetz v. [People of State of] Michigan, 188 U.S. 505 , 23 S.Ct. 390 , 47 L.Ed. 563 .” … As authority for this proposition see our case of Saunders v. Swann, 155 Tenn. 310 , 292 S.W. 458 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. Electric Power Board

    36 Tenn. App. 527 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 11, 1953

    The general rule is, as stated in Moyers v. Ogle, 24 Tenn. App. 682, 686 , 148 S. … Kelsey v. Rebuzzini, 87 Conn. 556 , 89 A. 170 , 52 L. R. A., *533 N. S., 103.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Lorenzo Romell Brown

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 26, 2025

    In State v. … State v. Rimmer, 623 S.W.3d 235, 278 (Tenn. 2021); State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bosan v. University Place Senior Living SE LP

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 8, 2025

    (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989))). Pro se litigants must still plead enough “factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Barnett v. … See Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Knoxville Utilities Board v. Lenoir City Utilities Board

    943 S.W.2d 879 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 20, 1996

    The only issue on appeal of this declaratory judgment suit is whether the taking by the City of Knoxville’s Utilities Board of the properties of the Lenoir City’s Utilities Board, used for the sale and distribution of electricity … It cites the following eases as supportive of its insistence: Duck River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of Manchester, 529 S.W.2d 202 (Tenn.1975); Electric Power Board v. Middle Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Harriman Utility Board

    26 S.W.3d 879 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 9, 2000

    The record discloses that the HUB board was made aware of the reorganization and Plaintiffs termination, and approved the actions. See, Williams v. … Irvin v. Binkley, 577 S.W.2d 677, 679 (Tenn.Ct.App.1978); Thomas v. Noe, 42 Tenn.App. 284 , 301 S.W.2d 391, 394 (1956); Foley v.. Dayton Bank & Trust, 696 S.W.2d 356, 359 (Tenn.Ct.App.1985).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Lumber Sales, Inc. v. Brown

    63 Tenn. App. 189 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 26, 1971

    Brown, let me ask you this: Is this your records right here? A. Yes. (Tendering documents.) Q. All right, sir, so you have — now, these are your business records? A. … Counsel for the defendant cites Parish and Parish Mining Co. v. Serodino, Inc. et al. (1963), 52 Tenn.App. 196 , 372 S.W.2d 433 , but that case is not applicable here for two reasons.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.