Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

3.77s

  • State v. Brown

    803 S.W.2d 197 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    858 S.W.2d 309 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1993

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    900 S.W.2d 226 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 9, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    862 S.W.2d 926 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1993

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    232 S.W.3d 609 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2007

    Gregory Lamont Brown (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 1 motion for postconviction relief. … Tillman v. State, 939 S.W.2d 388, 389 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    879 S.W.2d 686 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arseneau v. Brown

    654 S.W.2d 948 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1983

    Brown’s motion was taken with the case. We hold the probate division’s order is not appealable, but for different reasons than those asserted by Brown. … Board of Public Utilities v. Crow, 592 S.W.2d 285, 288 [3] (Mo.App.1979). Whether the law should be changed is not for us to decide. We realize our holding leaves the parties where we find them.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    465 S.W.2d 563 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1971

    the time the pleas were entered the assistant circuit attorney made the following statement concerning the occurrence (which defendant agreed was substantially correct): “On November 27, 1966, this defendant, Frederick Brown … In support of his contention defendant has cited State v. Bursby, Mo.Sup., 395 S.W.2d 155 , State v. Holland, Mo.Sup., 411 S.W.2d 181 , *568 and State v. Arnold, Mo.Sup., 419 S.W.2d 59 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    738 S.W.2d 478 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1987

    Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion. The judgment has been affirmed, per curiam, pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    737 S.W.2d 219 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 1987

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Havens v. Brown

    208 Mo. App. 473 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1922

    [Berlinger v. MacDonald, 133 N. Y. Suppl. 522; Graham v. Grape Capsule Co., 113 N. Y. Suppl. 103.] … Co. v. O’Reilly, 197 Mo. 466, 476 .]

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    829 S.W.2d 505 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1992

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    815 S.W.2d 84 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    815 S.W.2d 67 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    630 S.W.2d 215 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1982

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Curtiss

    155 Mo. App. 376 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 1, 1911

    “The petition further states that said bank and said Brown were in ignorance of any valid lien arising through said judgment against the said land and that so far as said Brown is concerned the said judgment was not a valid … [L. c. 253; Rodney v. Gibbs, 184 Mo. 1 ; Howland v. R. R., 134 Mo. 474 ; State v. Wear, 145 Mo. 162 ; Fisher v. Fisher, 114 Mo. App. 631 .]

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mass v. Brown

    7 Mo. 305 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1842

    Mass sued Brown before a justice of the • peace, and obtained a judgment: from this judgment, Brown appealed to the circuit court; and that court deciding in favor of Brown, Mass appealed to this court. … On the trial of the cause in tjie circuit court, the appellant, Mass, gave iu evidence a promissory note, made to *306 by Brown, the Appellee.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fricke

    1 Mo. 440 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1824

    Among the papers filed by the Justice in the Circuit Court, was an account headed as follows : e< George Fricke to Rachel Brown, Dr. for washing and mending, &c.” … The plaintiff then offered to amend the said account, by heading it, "George Fricke to John Brown, Dr.;” which *313 was objected to and refused by the Court, to which decision the plaintiff excepted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    41 Mo. 490 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1867

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gantt v. Brown

    232 Mo. 390 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 9, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.