Case law

Patrick F. Andrews v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2018

See Giglio v. … Veney v.

United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Monfort of Colorado, Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc., United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

852 F.2d 1344 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 1988

P 10,648 UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Monfort of Colorado, Inc., Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. … Conair Corporation v. N.L.R.B., 721 F.2d 1355, 1386 (D.C.Cir.1983). 3 We enforce the Board's order as entered by it. I.

NLRB v. NP Palace LLC

1 F.4th 12 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 2021

, PETITIONER v. … That is where the Board comes in. Here, the Board used its “broad discretion[]” to craft a remedy that protects confidential information. Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 216 (1964).

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International

633 F. Supp. 779 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 1985

Air East, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board, 512 F.2d 1227,1229 (3d Cir.), cert denied, 423 U.S. 863 [ 96 S.Ct. 122 , 46 L.Ed.2d 92 ] ... (1975); United Airlines, Inc. v. … See Air East, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board, supra, and In Re Paris Air Crash of March 3, 1974, 399 F.Supp. 732, 747-48 (C.D.Cal.1975). World Airways, Inc. v.

Campbell v. United States Parole Commission

563 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2008

Board of Parole (“Board”) issued a violation warrant seeking his return to custody. (Resp’t Ex. C.) After a revocation hearing, the Board revoked Campbell’s parole on October 7, 1985. (Resp’t Ex. D.) … Lawson v.

Goudreau v. Standard Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

511 A.2d 386 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1986

Code § 28-3301 (b)(4) creates “an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives” of Bank Board regulations pertaining to escrow accounts. Hines v. … Nevertheless, we note that several courts have found preemption because HOLA and the Bank Board’s regulations occupy either the entire field of regulation or some particular aspect of it. See, e.g., Meyers v.

In Re McGowan

827 A.2d 31 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2003

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McGowan, Misc. No. AG-4 (Md.March7, 2002) (unreported). Bar Counsel filed with this court a certified copy of the Maryland disbarment order. … Bar Rule XI, § 11(d), 1 and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”). The Board has now recommended that respondent be reciprocally disbarred.

Kornitzky Grp., LLC v. Elwell

912 F.3d 637 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 2019

See Order, Wilson v. Cox, No. 12-5070 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 16, 2013); Order, Am. Tort Reform Ass'n v. OSHA , No. 12-1229 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 9, 2013); Order, Janko v. Gates, No. 12-5017 (D.C. Cir. … Oct. 9, 2013); Order, Mittleman v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, No. 12-1095 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 9, 2013); Order, Roane v. Leonhart, No. 12-5020 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 9, 2013); Order, United States v.

Lubow v. United States Department of State

923 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2013

See Camp v. … This analysis, apparent from the Board’s explanation, may, at the very least, “reasonably be discerned” from its decision. See Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Ark.

In Re Webster

661 A.2d 144 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1995

Based upon respondent’s misconduct in Palau, the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) recommends the imposition of reciprocal discipline against respondent. … See Bowoon Sangsa Co. v. Micronesian Indus. Carp., 720 F.2d 595 , 599 (9th Cir.1983). 9 .

Massman v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development

332 F. Supp. 894 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1971

See Kutcher v. Higley, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 278 , 235 F.2d 505 (1956); Money v. Anderson, 93 U.S. App.D.C. 130, 208 F.2d 34 (1953); Washington v. … See Kutcher v. Higley, supra; Mulligan v. Andrews, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 375 , 211 F.2d 28 (1954); Money v. Anderson, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 130 , 208 F.2d 34 (1953); Deak v.

Chappell-Johnson v. Powell

440 F.3d 484 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 2006

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999). To be sure, as the FDIC points out, we explained in Teneyck v. Omni Shoreham Hotel, 365 F.3d 1139,  7 1150 (D.C. … Brown, 199 F.3d at 452; cf. Holbrook v. Reno, 196 F.3d 255, 261 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (stating burden as requirement to show “that she and [a] similarly situated person were treated disparately”); Bundy v.

McKinley v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

807 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 8, 2011

Larson v. Dep’t of State, 565 F.3d 857, 869 (D.C.Cir.2009) *5 (quoting Meeropol v. Meese, 790 F.2d 942, 956 (D.C.Cir.1986)). The search for records need not be exhaustive, see Oglesby v. U.S. … See Mason v.

Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc. v. NLRB

6 F.4th 1291 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 30, 2021

Inova Health Sys. v. NLRB, 795 F.3d 68, 80 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Bally’s Park Place, Inc. v. NLRB, 646 F.3d 929, 935 (D.C. Cir. 2011)). … Propert v. District of Columbia, 948 F.2d 1327, 1332 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (citing Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113, 127 (1990)).

S.S. v. City of Springfield

332 F. Supp. 3d 367 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2018

United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Grp., Inc. , 517 U.S. 544 , 552, 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). … Brown Group , 517 U.S. at 558 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 .

Veritas Health Servs., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

895 F.3d 69 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 2018

Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. NLRB , 682 F.3d 65 , 67 (D.C. Cir. 2012). In particular, we defer to the Board's well-reasoned "interpretation of its own precedent," Ceridian Corp. v. NLRB , 435 F.3d 352 , 355 (D.C. … We review the Board's denial of an administrative subpoena for abuse of discretion. See SSC Mystic Operating Co. v. NLRB , 801 F.3d 302 , 330 (D.C. Cir. 2015) ; Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. v.

DeSipio v. DeSipio

186 A.2d 624 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1962

Howard v. Howard, 72 App.D.C. 145 , 112 F.2d 44 ; Reed v. Reed, 52 App.D.C. 35 , 280 F. 1009 ; Shelton v. Shelton, D.C. Mun.App., 153 A.2d 663 . . Gill v. Gill, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 357, 359 , 147 F.2d 154 . . Melvin v. … Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309 , 122 F.2d 219 ; Miller v. Miller, D.C.Mun.App., 180 A.2d 888, 890; Johnson v. Johnson, D.C.Mun.App., 179 A.2d 720, 721 . . Foley v. Foley, D.C.Mun.App., 184 A.2d 853 . . Wheeler v.

Coleman v. Chao

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 19, 2022

Williams v. Brennan, 285 F. … Supp. 2d at 417 (quoting Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985); see also Miller v. Rosenker, 578 F.

Int'l Longshore & Warehouse Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

890 F.3d 1100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 2018

Univ. v. NLRB, 807 F.3d 308, 316 (D.C. Cir. 2015). Before the Board, ILWU did not challenge the Board remedy in light of the Employer’s settlement with IAM and its members. … See NLRB v.

In Re Report & Recommendation of June 5, 1972 Grand Jury Concerning Transmission of Evidence to the House of Representatives

370 F. Supp. 1219 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 1974

Brown, 323 F.Supp. 326 (N.D. … Atwell v.