Case law

Cardwell v. Smith

92 N.C. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 30, 1988

Cardwell v. Forsyth County Zoning Board of Adjustment, 88 N.C. App. 244 , 362 S.E. 2d 843 (1987), disc. rev. denied, 321 N.C. 742 , 366 S.E. 2d 858 (1988). … Harris v. N.C. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co., 91 N.C. App. 147, 150 , 370 S.E. 2d 700, 702 (1988) (citation omitted).

Southern Assembly v. . Palmer

166 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1914

School Comrs. v. Board of Aldermen, 158 N. C., pp.. 191-198, citing 1 Lewis Sutherland (2 Ed.), sec. 268; Dodgers v. U. S., 185 U. S., 83 , and other authorities.” … . *82 In Comrs. v. Webb, supra; Corporation Commission v. Construction Co., 160 N. C., 582 ; United Brethren v. Comrs., 115 N. C., 489 ; Loan Assn. v. Comrs., 115 N.

Stroud v. Benson

155 F. Supp. 482 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 26, 1957

Parker v. … In Board of Trade of City of Chicago v.

Patterson v. McCormick

177 N.C. 448 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1919

C., 69 , opinion by Gaston, J.; Brown v. Brown, 25 N. C., 134 , opinion by Ruffin, C. J.; Gibson v. Gibson, 49 N. C., 425 , opinion by Battle, J. This last case was decided in 1857. … Rice v. Satterwhite, 21 N. C., 69 , and note; Clapp v. Fogleman, 21 N. C., 467 ; Tillman v. Sinclair, 23 N. C., 183 ; Moore v. Barrow, 24 N. C., 436 ; Brown v. Brown, 25 N. C., 134 ; Garland v. Watt, 26 N.

State v. Conner

345 N.C. 319 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 10, 1997

See State v. … State v. Brown, 327 N.C. 1, 19 , 394 S.E.2d 434, 445 (1990).

Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. BUZZ OFF INSECT SHIELD, LLC

364 N.C. 248 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 16, 2010

698 S.E.2d 397 (2010) HARLEYSVILLE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. … Brown, Greensboro, Grant S. Palmer, Philadelphia, PA, for Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co. Robert J. King, III, Greensboro, Cecilia O. Miller, San Diego, CA, J. Scott Ballenger, Washington, DC, for International Garment Tech.

Wood v. Town of Warsaw

914 F. Supp. 2d 735 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 21, 2012

See Johnson v. … Tuck v.

Caldwell v. Linker

901 F. Supp. 1010 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 6, 1995

Satterfield v. Pappas, 67 N.C.App. 28 , 812 S.E.2d 511 (1984). … Carver v. Britt, 241 N.C. 538 , 85 S.E.2d 888 (1955).

Swann v. Source One Staffing Solutions

778 F. Supp. 2d 611 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 24, 2011

Applied Radiant Energy Corp., 240 F.3d 262, 265-66 (4th Cir.2001); Brown v. Perry, 184 F.3d 388, 395 (4th Cir.1999); Lissau v. S. … Brown, 184 F.3d at 395 ; Dowdy v. North Carolina, 23 Fed.Appx. 121, 123 (4th Cir.2001) (per curiam) (unpublished).

State v. Allen

332 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 17, 1992

In Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 45 L. Ed. 2d 416 (1975), the Court held that the giving of a Miranda warning was not sufficient to remove the taint of a confession following an illegal arrest. … In Brown and in Taylor v. Alabama, 457 U.S. 687 , 73 L.

Treadwell v. Goodwin

14 N.C. App. 685 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 28, 1972

Chisholm v. Hall, 255 N.C. 374 , 121 S.E. 2d 726 (1961). See also, Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390 , 180 S.E. 2d 297 (1971). … See also, Kearney v. Hare, 265 N.C. 570 , 144 S.E. 2d 636 (1965) ; Duke v. Davenport, 240 N.C. 652 , 83 S.E. 2d 668 (1954) and 5 Strong, N. C.

Hursey v. Town of Gibsonville

18 N.C. App. 581 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1973

This principle was succinctly stated in Cheek v. … State v. Greenwood, 280 N.C. 651 , 187 S.E. 2d 8 ; Cheek v. City of Charlotte, supra; State v. Smith, 265 N.C. 173 , 143 S.E. 2d 293 ; State v. Glidden Co., 228 N.C. 664 , 46 S.E. 2d 860 .

Kornegay v. City of Goldsboro

180 N.C. 441 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1920

Johnson v. Board of Education, 166 N. C., 472 . … D., 518; Memphis v. Brown, 16 Fed. Cases, No. 9415.

Smathers v. Commissioners of Madison County

125 N.C. 480 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1899

McCless v. Meekins , 117 N.C. 34 ; Tate v. Commissioners , 122 N.C. 812 . … Bank v. Comrs. , 119 N.C. 214 ; Comrs. v. Snuggs , 121 N.C. 394 ; Comrs. v. Call , 123 N.C. 308 ; City of Charlotte v. Shepard , 122 N.C. 602 . In Comrs. v.

Budd v. Davie County

116 N.C. App. 168 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1994

.); Concerned, Citizens of Downtown Asheville v. Board of Adjustment of Asheville, 94 N.C. … See Chrismon v.

State v. . Johnson

169 N.C. 311 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1915

BROWN, J. … S. v. Bailey, 162 N. C., 583 ; S. v. Register, 133 N. C., 747 ; S. v. Wilcox, 132 N. C., 11 ; S. v. Kinsauls, 126 N. C., 1092; S. v. Carter, 126 N. C., 1011 . Affirmed.

Dale v. Town of Columbus, NC

101 N.C. App. 335 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1991

Determining the validity of the ordinance enacted by the Columbus Board is, therefore, a proper case for summary judgment. See Blades v. City of Raleigh, 280 N.C. 531 , 187 S.E.2d 35 (1972). … Although not every case of spot zoning is illegal, Chrismon v.

Arrington v. Taylor

380 F. Supp. 1348 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Aug 28, 1974

Kleindienst v. Mandel, 408 U.S. 753 , 92 S.Ct. 2576 , 33 L.Ed.2d 683 (1972); Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 , 89 S.Ct. 1243 , 22 L.Ed.2d 542 (1969); Lamont v. … Joyner v. Whiting, 477 F.2d 456, 466 (4th Cir. 1973) (Judge Field, dissenting.) Other courts have similarly held. E. g. Lee v. Board of Regents of State Colleges, 441 F.2d 1257 (7th Cir. 1971).

State v. Joyner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2022

Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 165, 293 S.E.2d 569, 579 (1982). In Brown, the defendant murdered a mother and daughter. … Moreover, while the defendant in Brown  STATE V.

Crow v. . Zimmerman

194 N.C. 823 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 1927

Brown lot is made subject to restrictions, although embraced within the recorded plat. There were certain recitals, restrictions, etc., in the deed dated 14 February, 1925, and duly recorded, from Mrs. Janie C. … Homes Co. v. Falls, 184 N. C., p. 426; Davis v. Robinson, 189 N. C., p. 589; Bailey v. Jackson-Campbell Co., 191 N. C., p. 61; Ivey v. Blythe, 193 N. C., p. 705. The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.