Case law

Chappell-Johnson v. Powell

440 F.3d 484 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 2006

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999). To be sure, as the FDIC points out, we explained in Teneyck v. Omni Shoreham Hotel, 365 F.3d 1139,  7 1150 (D.C. … Brown, 199 F.3d at 452; cf. Holbrook v. Reno, 196 F.3d 255, 261 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (stating burden as requirement to show “that she and [a] similarly situated person were treated disparately”); Bundy v.

Monica v. Tobriner

253 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 26, 1966

V 1966) which provides for a pension in the minimum amount of 66% percent of the retiree’s basic salary. … Blohm v.

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Boyd

207 F. Supp. 152 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 1962

In Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. C. A. … Mississippi v. Johnson, 4 Wall. 475 , 18 L.Ed. 437 ; Georgia v. Stanton, 6 Wall. 50 , 18 L.Ed. 721 ; Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 , 72 S.Ct. 863 , 96 L.Ed. 1153 .

United States v. Philip Morris Inc.

156 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2001

See Dowling v. … Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Lorillard Tobacco Company, The Liggett Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Philip Morris Cos., B.A.T. Industries p.l.c.

The News Union of Baltimore v. National Labor Relations Board, Hearst Corp., News American Division, Intervenor. Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local 355, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers v. National Labor Relations Board, Hearst Corp., News American Division, Intervenor

393 F.2d 673 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 9, 1968

393 F.2d 673 The NEWS UNION OF BALTIMORE, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Hearst Corp., News American Division, Intervenor. … NLRB v.

Miller v. United States

603 F. Supp. 1244 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 1985

See Brown v. Puget Sound Electrical Apprenticeship and Training Trust, 732 F.2d 726, 730 (9th Cir.1984). 11 . … Louis Brown v. Department of Justice, U.S. Marshal’s Service, No. 85-0513 (Fed.Cir.).

Morrison v. United States

417 A.2d 409 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1980

But see also in this connection, Brown v. … See also Bussie v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 81 A.2d 247 (1951); compare Brown v. United States, D.C. App., 379 A.2d 708 , 710 n.3 (1977).

DeSipio v. DeSipio

186 A.2d 624 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1962

Howard v. Howard, 72 App.D.C. 145 , 112 F.2d 44 ; Reed v. Reed, 52 App.D.C. 35 , 280 F. 1009 ; Shelton v. Shelton, D.C. Mun.App., 153 A.2d 663 . . Gill v. Gill, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 357, 359 , 147 F.2d 154 . . Melvin v. … Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309 , 122 F.2d 219 ; Miller v. Miller, D.C.Mun.App., 180 A.2d 888, 890; Johnson v. Johnson, D.C.Mun.App., 179 A.2d 720, 721 . . Foley v. Foley, D.C.Mun.App., 184 A.2d 853 . . Wheeler v.

Berman v. Watergate West, Inc.

391 A.2d 1351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1978

Another witness, a member of the by-then independent board of directors of the cooperative, fully corroborated appellant’s testimony in this regard. … A:M Sunrise Construction Co., 36 Ill.App.2d 383 , 184 N.E.2d 728 (1962); Barnes v. Mac Brown & Co., 342 N.E.2d 619 (Ind.1976); Theis v.

Patrick F. Andrews v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2018

See Giglio v. … Veney v.

United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Monfort of Colorado, Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc., United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

852 F.2d 1344 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 1988

P 10,648 UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Monfort of Colorado, Inc., Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner v. … Conair Corporation v. N.L.R.B., 721 F.2d 1355, 1386 (D.C.Cir.1983). 3 We enforce the Board's order as entered by it. I.

In Re Patkus

654 A.2d 1291 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1995

DR 9-103(A). 1 Bar Counsel agrees with the recommendation, and respondent has filed no opposition to the Board’s recommendation. We accept the Board’s finding of misappropriation, D.C. … The Board likewise rejected, as do we, respondent's invocation of the "necessity defense” to excuse his misappropriation of the estate funds. See Griffin v.

United Furniture Workers of America, Afl-Cio and Local 270, United Furniture Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

336 F.2d 738 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 1964

Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … See Local Union 219, Retail Clerks International Association, AFL-CIO v. N. L. R. B., 105 U.S.App.D.C. 232 , 265 F.2d 814 (1959). Compare Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory, N. Y. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg.

Rutledge v. Del Toro

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2024

Smith v. Dalton, 927 F. Supp. 1, 5 (D.D.C. 1996). … Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199, 235 (1974).

Black v. Saul

District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2023

Defendant cites McKart v. … Kaul v. Fed’n of State Med. Boards, No. 19-cv-3050, 2020 WL 7042821, at *7 (D.D.C. Dec. 1, 2020).

NLRB v. NP Palace LLC

1 F.4th 12 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 2021

, PETITIONER v. … That is where the Board comes in. Here, the Board used its “broad discretion[]” to craft a remedy that protects confidential information. Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 216 (1964).

Mountain States Health Alliance v. Sebelius

128 F. Supp. 3d 195 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 2015

Part 413; 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(v)(1)(A). … Health Servs. v.

St NE Dept Hlth v. Dept Hlth Human Svc

435 F.3d 326 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 2006

Bruning, Attorney General, Attorney General’s Office of State of Nebraska.  2 Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and GARLAND and BROWN, Circuit Judges. … Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Washburn, 535 F.2d 101, 108 (D.C. Cir. 1976); see also Va. Soc’y for Human Life, Inc. v.

Swanson Group Mfg. LLC v. Sally Jewell

790 F.3d 235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 2015

The allowable sale quantity for Roseburg is 45 million board feet; for Medford, 57.1 million board feet. … of the allowable sale quantity, averaging 32 million board feet per year.

Singer v. Doyle

236 A.2d 436 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1967

Phillips v. D. C. Transit System, Inc., D.C.App., 198 A.2d 740, 741 (1964); Mitchell v. Allied Cab Co., D.C.Mun.App., 133 A.2d 477, 479 (1957); Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296, 298 (1945). … Brown v. Clancy, D.C.Mun.App., 43 A.2d 296, 298 (1945). 3 .Sec. 47. Vehicle Turning Left at or Between Intersections.