Case law

Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. Guilford County

225 N.C. 293 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1945

, or in pursuance of a resolution adopted by the board. … See London v. Comrs., supra. Whether the present board of commissioners for Guilford County may now supply the deficiency nunc pro lunc and proceed to act in the premises is not now before us.

Reynolds Innovations, Inc. v. E-CigaretteDirect, LLC

851 F. Supp. 2d 961 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jan 31, 2012

EMI April Music, Inc. v. White, 618 F.Supp.2d 497, 505 (E.D.Va.2009); see United States v. Moradi, 673 F.2d 725, 727 (4th Cir.1982). … Brown, the Summons and Complaint directed to Defendant ECigaretteDirect, LLC, were served on Michael King “at the defendant’s usual place of abode” in La Grange, Illinois. (Doc. 9-1 at 4.)

Road Commissioners v. County Commissioners

186 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1923

Bramham v. Durham, 171 N. C., 196 -198. This decision quotes with approval from the opinion of Associate Justice Fields in U. S. v. Tyner, 78 U. … Kearney v. Vann, 154 N. C., 311 ; In re Applicants for License, 143 N.

State v. Davis

124 N.C. App. 93 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1996

In State v. … Moreover, in State v.

Johnson v. Starboard Ass'n, Inc.

244 N.C. App. 619 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 5, 2016

See Ron Medlin Constr. v. … See, e.g., Armstrong v.

Piedmont Aviation, Inc. v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority

288 N.C. 98 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 26, 1975

The statement in Candler v. … In Morgan v.

State v. Gibson

32 N.C. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1977

Spinelli v. U. S., 393 U.S. 410 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 637 , 89 S.Ct. 584 (1968); Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 12 L.Ed. 2d 723 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 (1964); State v. … State v. Ellington, 284 N.C. 198 , 200 S.E. 2d 177 (1973); State v. Caldwell, 25 N.C. App. 269 , 212 S.E. 2d 669 (1975); State v. Brown, 20 N.C.

First National Bank v. Warlick

125 N.C. 593 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 1899

The order was not approved in a regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners. Cotton Mills v. Commissioners, 108 N. C., 678 . … Bank v. Bradley, 117 N. C., 526 .

Browning v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

263 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1964

Browning at the time she executed such right of way agreement. The purchase of an easement from one co-tenant does not carry with it an easement in the interest of the other co-tenant. Hill v. … In the case of Penn v.

Hursey v. Town of Gibsonville

18 N.C. App. 581 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1973

This principle was succinctly stated in Cheek v. … State v. Greenwood, 280 N.C. 651 , 187 S.E. 2d 8 ; Cheek v. City of Charlotte, supra; State v. Smith, 265 N.C. 173 , 143 S.E. 2d 293 ; State v. Glidden Co., 228 N.C. 664 , 46 S.E. 2d 860 .

Dewey v. . R. R.

142 N.C. 392 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 23, 1906

Old Ladies' Home v. Hoffman , 117 Iowa 716 ; Wichita v. Burleigh , 36 Kansas, 34. … Cited: White v. Kincaid , 149 N.C. 420 ; Barger v. Barringer , 151 N.C. 446 ; Butler v. Tobacco Co. , 152 N.C. 419 ; Commrs. v. Bonner , 153 N.C. 70 ; S. v. R. R., Ib. , 561, 562; R. R. v.

Britt v. Britt

49 N.C. App. 463 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1980

Brown v. Board of Education, 269 N.C. 667, 153 S.E. 2d 335 (1967); Durland v. Peters, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 42 N.C. App. 25 , 255 S.E. 2d 650 (1979); In re Vinson, 42 N.C. App. 28 , 255 S.E. 2d 644 (1979). … In Bunn v.

Hodges v. . Smith

158 N.C. 256 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1912

I had to hire a man to work at 50 cents per day and board at 25 cents per day. The horse I traded to Smith was worth $50. I lost him and *Page 217 lost my crop that year. My time was worth $1 per day. … Cited: S.C. , 159 N.C. 526 ; Fields v. Brown , 160 N.C. 299 ; Winn v. Finch , 171 N.C. 275 . (264)

Johnson v. Gray

263 N.C. 507 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1965

(later C.J.), writing in Coleman v. … [Citations], In Kirby v.

State v. Allen

45 N.C. App. 417 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1980

Accord, State v. McLawhorn, 43 N.C. App. 695 , 260 S.E. 2d 138 (1979). … See State v. Boyd, 278 N.C. 682 , 180 S.E. 2d 794 (1971).

Futures Grp., Inc. v. Brosnan

2022 NCBC 79 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 7, 2022

In 2009, Brosnan and Futures, acting through its Board of Directors (the “Board”), agreed by letter agreement to modify the Note (the “Modification”). … (emphasis added)); Black v.

State v. Christie

96 N.C. App. 178 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1989

Like our defendant, Rembert argued that he was seized at the bus terminal when officers boarded a bus upon which he was a passenger. The court found that the boarding was entirely consensual, citing INS v. … Third, a seizure did not occur because the officers’ boarding the bus was not more intrusive than necessary. In United States v.

Smathers v. Commissioners of Madison County

125 N.C. 480 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1899

McCless v. Meekins , 117 N.C. 34 ; Tate v. Commissioners , 122 N.C. 812 . … Bank v. Comrs. , 119 N.C. 214 ; Comrs. v. Snuggs , 121 N.C. 394 ; Comrs. v. Call , 123 N.C. 308 ; City of Charlotte v. Shepard , 122 N.C. 602 . In Comrs. v.

Budd v. Davie County

116 N.C. App. 168 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1994

.); Concerned, Citizens of Downtown Asheville v. Board of Adjustment of Asheville, 94 N.C. … See Chrismon v.

City of Greensboro v. Simpson

188 N.C. 737 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1924

The fund arising from the sale is to be turned over to the proper authorities and used for public purposes, as the board of education of Greensboro may determine, presumably for school purposes. Blue v. … C., 321 ; Harris v. Durham, 185 N. C., 572 ; Torrence v. Charlotte, 163 N. C., 562 ; Venable v. School Comrs., 149 N. C., 120 .