Case law

HEMPHILL NOLAN v. Town of Weddington

153 N.C. App. 144 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 17, 2002

Prac. 19; State v. Hamrick, 110 N.C. … See White Oak Properties, Inc. v.

Lee v. Tolson

166 N.C. App. 256 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 2004

The hearing before the Review Board was held on 15 August 2001. The Board rendered a decision affirming the Assistant Secretary's decision on 9 November 2001. … See, e.g., Reap v.

Bryan v. Raynor

94 N.C. App. 173 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1989

Neigborhood Assoc. v. Town of Chapel Hill, 63 N.C. App. 244, 253 , 304 S.E. 2d 251, 256 (1983) (quoting Refining Co. v. … Municipal boards are not strictly bound by the formal rules of evidence, which is in accordance with their quasi-judicial nature. See Burton v. New Hanover City Zoning Bd., 49 N.C.

Grandfather Village v. Worsley

111 N.C. App. 686 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 1993

Appeals shall be taken within times prescribed by the board of adjustment by general rule, by filing with the officer from whom the appeal is taken and with the board of adjustment a notice of appeal, specifying the grounds … The board of adjustment is the final arbiter of fact. Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 626 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 383 , reh’g denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980).

United States v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

135 F. Supp. 600 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Nov 14, 1955

In Lewis v. … The Board was held entitled to the fund. United States v.

State v. Higgins

16 N.C. App. 581 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1972

Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 , 69 L.Ed. 543 ; Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 . … Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 26 L.Ed. 2d 419 .

Jefferson v. Jefferson

219 N.C. 333 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 26, 1941

In Jones v. Whichard, 163 N. C., 241 (246), 79 S. E., 503 , Justice HoTce, speaking for the Court, said: “In Triplett v. … Powell v. Powell, 168 N. C., 561 , 84 S. E., 860 ; Waller v. Brown, 197 N. C., 508 , 149 S. E., 687 ; Poe v. Journegan, 175 N. C., 261 , 95 S. E., 495 .

Wood v. Town of Warsaw

914 F. Supp. 2d 735 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 21, 2012

See Johnson v. … Tuck v.

JVC Enters., LLC v. City of Concord

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 2021

V. … V.

Se. Sureties Grp., Inc. v. Int'l Fid. Ins. Co.

244 N.C. App. 439 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2015

(“the Board”). … V. INT’L FID. INS. CO.

Harrell v. . Commissioners of Wilson

206 N.C. 225 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1934

Vaughn v. Commissioners, 117 N. C., 429 ; Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 ; Haskett v. Tyrrell Co., 152 N. C., 714 . … Tate v. Board of Education, 192 N. C., 516 ; Frazier v. Comrs., 194 N. C., 49 .

Lanning v. Commissioners of Transylvania County

106 N.C. 505 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Royster v. Commissioners, 98 N. C., 148 ; Moore v. Commissioners, 87 N. C., 215 . … Barcroft v. Roberts, 91 N. C., 363 ; Cooper v. Middleton, 94 N. C., 86 ; Usry v. Suit, 91 N. C., 406 ; Reaves v. Davis, 99 N. C., 425 , and cases cited. The evidence taken by the referee is sent with the record.

Ahoskie v. . Moye

200 N.C. 11 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1930

Both were adopted in the exercise of the police power of the State, conferred by the General Assembly on the board of commissioners of said towns. In Wake Forest v. Medlin, supra, Stacy, C. … Burden v. Ahoskie , 198 N.C. 92 ; MacRae v. Fayetteville , 198 N.C. 54 ; Clinton v. Oil Co. , 193 N.C. 432 , 137 S.E. 183 ; Bizzell v. Goldsboro , 192 N.C. 348 , 135 S.E. 50 .

Redmond v. . Staton

116 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1895

Nesbit v. Brown, 1 Dev. Eq., 30 . A buys a non-negotiable note, which gives him the equitable but not the legal title to the note. … The case of Timberlake v. Powell, 99 N.

State v. Reynolds

298 N.C. 380 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1979

The Court held, citing Brown v. … State v. Squire, 292 N.C. 494 , 234 S.E. 2d 563 , cert. denied sub nom., Brown v. N.C., 434 U.S. 998 , 98 S.Ct. 638 , 54 L.Ed. 2d 493 (1977); State v. Williams, 284 N.C. 67 , 199 S.E. 2d 409 (1973); State v.

Johnson v. . R. R.

163 N.C. 431 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 22, 1913

Turner v. Davis , 132 N.C. 187 ; S. v. Starnes , 97 N.C. 423 ; Brown v . (454) Mitchell , 102 N.C. 347 ; S. v. DeGraff , 113 N.C. 688 ; Schehan v. Malone , 72 N.C. 59 ; Mottu v. Davis , 153 N.C. 160 ; Aden v. … R. , 169 N.C. 116 ; Davidson v. R. R. , 170 N.C. 284 ; LeGwin v. R. R., ib. , 361; Penninger v. R. R., ib. , 475; Brown v. R. R. , 171 N.C. 269 ; Gainey v. Godwin, ib. , 755; Lutterloh v. R. R. , 172 N.C. 118 ; Odom v.

Buffaloe v. United Carolina Bank

89 N.C. App. 693 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1988

Tuttle v. Lumber Co., 263 N.C. 216 , 139 S.E. 2d 249 (1964). Plaintiff cites Sides v. Duke University, 74 N.C. … In Burkhimer v. Gealy, 39 N.C.

State v. . Freeman

114 N.C. 872 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1894

Pittman v. Kimberly, supra, .is exactly in point, and has often been cited and approved. Stephens v. Koonce, 106 N. C., 255, 256 ; Porter v. Railroad, 106 N. C., 478 ; State v. Preston, 104 N. C., 733 ; Bailey v. … Brown, 105 N. C., 127 ; Pipkin v. Green, 112 N. C., 355 . Motion denied and appeal dismissed. Dismissed.

Haden v. . Bradshaw

60 N.C. 259 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1864

Rankin v. Rankin , 31 N.C. 156 ; Brown v. Brown , 6 N.C. 350 . In the present case it is admitted by the counsel for the caveators that every requisition of the act (Rev. … Cited: Smith v. Smith , 63 N.C. 640 ; Bundrick v. Haygood , 106 N.C. 472 ; In re Garland Will , 160 N.C. 558 .

Johnston v. J. A. Hackney & Sons, Inc.

300 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 26, 1969

Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. v. Meter, 385 F.2d 265 (10th Cir., 1967). This view is substantiated by the language of the Supreme Court in United States v. W. T. … Swift & Co. v.