Case law

Clore Restaurant, Inc. v. Payne

72 F. Supp. 677 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 1947

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 81(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; National Bondholders Corp. v. McClintic, 4 Cir., 99 F.2d 595 ; George Allison & Co. Inc. v. … . *681 375 , 107 F.2d 180 ; Levine v. Farley, 70 App.D.C. 381 , 107 F.2d 186 ; Hammond v.

In Re Bernstein

774 A.2d 309 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2001

[ejngage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation which reflects adversely on a lawyer’s fitness to practice law.”); Blue v. Seventh Dist. Comm. of Va. … Accordingly, we decline to adopt the third condition of reinstatement proposed by the Board. 18 V. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Kenneth R. Bernstein is suspended from practice for a period of nine months.

Local 814, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen v. National Labor Relations Board, Karl J. Leib, Jr., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Santini Brothers, Inc.

512 F.2d 564 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 30, 1975

Because the Board has not explained its reasons for reaching different results, 6 see Greater Boston Television Corp. v. F. C. … If the Board finds the two indistinguishable, it should so inform the court. See N. L. R. B. v.

Communications Workers of America v. NLRB

994 F.3d 653 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 2021

In NLRB v. … Napleton 1050, Inc. v. NLRB, 976 F.3d 30, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2020) (quoting Constellium Rolled Prods. Ravenswood, LLC v. NLRB, 945 F.3d 546, 550 (D.C. Cir. 2019)); accord NLRB v. Peninsula Gen. Hosp. Med.

Everport Terminal Services Inc v. NLRB

47 F.4th 782 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 26, 2022

The Longshore Contract’s scope is broad, reaching “[v]irtually all longshore work at West Coast ports,” ILWU v. … The Board has long permitted groups of employers to negotiate with their employees collectively through multiemployer bargaining units. See Arbor Constr. Pers., Inc., 343 NLRB 257, 257–58 (2004); cf. Brown v.

Kearns v. Federal Aviation Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 2018

Board under that case number. … See Brown v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 2015 WL 1237274, at *6 (E.D. Cal.

Shook v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority

964 F. Supp. 416 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 1997

Contractors Coalition v. … Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , 89 S.Ct. 5 , 21 L.Ed.2d 24 (1968); Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780 , 103 S.Ct. 1564 , 75 L.Ed.2d 547 (1983).

Plevnik v. Sullivan

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2023

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … Plevnik cannot amend his complaint through subsequent briefing to state a claim against Brown based on facilitating his entry into the embassy. See Kingman Park Civic Ass’n v. Gray, 27 F.

Napleton 1050, Inc. v. NLRB

976 F.3d 30 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 6, 2020

We review the Board’s procedural rulings for abuse of discretion. See Salem Hosp. Corp. v. NLRB, 808 F.3d 59, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2015); see also Veritas Health Servs., Inc. v. NLRB, 895 F.3d 69, 87 (D.C. … See, e.g., Goldtex, Inc. v.

In Re NAYY CHAPLAINCY

841 F. Supp. 2d 336 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2012

also Blackmon-Malloy v. … Kosnik v. Peters, 31 F.

United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

221 F. Supp. 325 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 1963

dismissing the complaint but at the same time issued an injunction restraining the Carriers from putting into effect the proposed changes in work rules during the pendency of appeal (Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. … Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, 372 U.S. 284 , 83 S.Ct. 691 , 9 L.Ed.2d 759 . 6.

Marshall v. James

276 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2003

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 144-45 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d at 452 ). … See, e.g., Brown v.

Fraser v. Gottfried

636 A.2d 430 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1994

See, e.g., Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); McBryde v. Amoco Oil Co., 404 A.2d 200, 202 (D.C.1979). … D.C.Code § 41-105(a) (1990); see also Beckman v.

In re Johnson

810 A.2d 917 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2002

Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Johnson, 363 Md. 598 , 770 A.2d 130, 151 (2001). … As neither Johnson nor Bar Counsel has contested the Board’s recommendation in this court, 1 “the Court will enter an order imposing the discipline recommended by the Board.” D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(f)(1).

Soliman v. Mayorkas

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2026

Individuals on the No Fly List are prohibited from boarding an 3 aircraft, and individuals on the Selectee List undergo enhanced screening before boarding an aircraft. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (rule 12(b)(6) case). I.

Patrick F. Andrews v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 22, 2018

Veney v. … See also Douglas v.

National Council of CSA Locals American Federation of Government Employees v. Schweiker

526 F. Supp. 861 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 1981

Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 90-92 , 94 S.Ct. 937, 952-953 , 39 L.Ed.2d 166 (1974). Furthermore, the Board, should the employees prevail, can grant back pay and restoration of benefits. … The employees can be represented by the union before the Board. See e. g., Wells v. Harris, 1 MSPB 199 (1979).

Emanuel Medical Center, Turlock, California v. Sebelius

37 F. Supp. 3d 348 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 2014

v. … v.

Eric Flannery v. Mark Eckenwiler

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 4, 2026

FLANNERY AND DRANE FLANNERY RESTAURANT, LLC, TRADING AS BIG BOARD, APPELLANTS v. … As the Court put it in Clark v.

Johnson v. Danneman

547 A.2d 981 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 1988

See generally District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. … District of Columbia, 520 A.2d 671 (D.C.1986); District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. *984 Jones, 481 A.2d 456 (D.C.1984); Convention Center Referendum Committee v.