Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

2.63s

  • Haskell v. Phinney

    595 F. Supp. 637 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 28, 1984

    They rely upon Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 [ 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 ] (1982), and Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 [ 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 ] (1977). … Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education furnishes the critical analysis on this issue. In Mount Healthy, the U.S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Foye v. City of Westbrook

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 4, 2001

    See Driscoll v. Gheewalla, 441 A.2d 1023, 1026-27 (Me. 1982). The plaintiffs must show, however, that the evidence compelled the ZBA to grant the variance. See Twigg v. … See Pepperman v. Town of Rangeley, 659 A.2d 280, 283-84 (Me. 1995). The entry is The Plaintiffs’ Appeal is DENIED. The Decision of the City of Westbrook Zoning Board of Appeals is AFFIRMED.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Kittery Retail Ventures, LLC. v. Town of Kittery

    Superior Court of Maine · May 29, 2003

    In City of Portland v. … Sahl v. — Town of York, 2000 ME 180, 712, 760 A.2d 266, 269.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Newport Trust Company v. Susi

    153 Me. 51 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 30, 1957

    Bank of Dothan v. American Surety Co. of N. … See New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. State (Md.), 128 A. 641 . Murchison Nat. Bank of Wilmington v. Clark, et al. (N. C.), 135 S. E. 123 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gunter v. Merchants Warren National Bank

    360 F. Supp. 1085 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 25, 1973

    Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385, 394 , 34 S.Ct. 779, 783 , 58 L.Ed. 1363 (1914); Baldwin v. Hale, 1 Wall. (68 U.S.) 223, 233, 17 L.Ed. 531 (1864); Armstrong v. … Schneider v. Margossian, 349 F.Supp. 741 (D.Mass. 1972) ; Trapper Brown Construction Co., Inc. v. Electromech, Inc., 358 F.Supp. 105 (D. N.H.1973).

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • State v. Nason

    433 A.2d 424 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 13, 1981

    In Bell v. … See Bell v. Wolfish, supra, 441 U.S. at 558-60 , 99 S.Ct. at 1881-85 ; United States v. Lilly, supra, at 1247; Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Thaxter v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 2, 2007

    THAXTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ON BILL OF COSTS ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, et al., Defendants. … Inhabitants of the Town of Sabattus v. Bilodeau, 395 A.2d 123, 124 (Me. 1978) (costs on appeal regarding an earlier action between the same parties, 391 A.2d 357 (Me. 1978)4 and Michaud v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rollins v. Blackden

    112 Me. 459 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 14, 1914

    Stillwell v. Foster, 80 Maine, 333; Sargent v. Ballard, 9 Pick., 251 ; Arnold v. Stevens, 24 Pick., 112 ; Powell v. Bagg, 8 Gray, 441 ; Smith v. Miller, 11 Gray, 145 ; Blake v. Everett, All., 248; School Dist. v. … Ayler, 7 Leigh, 546 ; Field v. Brown, 24 Gratt., 74 . See also Bealey v. Shaw, supra; Stillman v. White Rock Mfg. Co., 23 Fed. Cas., 549 ; Washburn on Easements, page 162; 14 Cyc., 1147.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • State v. RYNE G.

    509 A.2d 1164 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 22, 1986

    In State v. … See State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Portland Pirates v. Cumberland Cty Rec. Ctr.

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 6, 2013

    Shaw v. S. Aroostook Cmty. Sc/1. … In Daigle Commercial Gro11p, l11c. v. St.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Vainio

    466 A.2d 471 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 5, 1983

    . § 393. 2 The evidence at trial did indicate, and Vainio did not deny, that on the alleged occasion he did have in his possession two firearms, a .357 Magnum and a .270 Browning rifle. … In Beaulieu v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • State v. Wardwell

    158 Me. 307 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 21, 1962

    Cunningham v. Long, 125 Me. 494, 497 ; Collins v. Dunbar, 131 Me. *310 337; Bank v. Shato, 79 Me. 376 ; Graffam v. Cobb, 98 Me. 200 ; Rumsey v. Bragg, 35 Me. 116 . … State v. Duguay, 158 Me. 61, 74 ; State v. Brown, 142 Me. 106, 108 ; State v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • McKeeman v. Cianbro Corp.

    2002 Me. 144 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 27, 2002

    We note that the Legislature has not disclosed the intent underlying section 107, and the Workers’ Compensation Board has not had occasion to clarify it. Russell v. … Id. [¶ 11] Following Weeks , in Overend v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Collagan v. Burns

    57 Me. 449 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1867

    In Dan v. Brown, 4 Cowp. 490, the will was proved. “ The testator,” observes Woodworth, J., “several months before his death, called for a will, and wished to add a codicil. … This case rests upon that of Ban v. Brown, 4 Cow. 490 . The will destroyed wrongfully, how otherwise could an act of spoliation be defeated ? Mr.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Office of the Public Advocate v. Public Utilities Commission

    2024 ME 11 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 30, 2024

    See Town of Mount Vernon v. … Brown v. Town of Starks, 2015 ME 47, ¶ 6, 114 A.3d 1003.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • JORDAN v. EASTERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER

    District Court, D. Maine · Dec 21, 2021

    Celotex Corp. v. … P. 15(a)(2); see also Foman v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State v. S.S. Kresge, Inc.

    364 A.2d 868 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 7, 1976

    In State v. … Board of County Commissioners of Anne Arundel County, 233 Md. 249 , 196 A.2d 621 (1964); State v. K-Mart, 134 N.J.Super. 76 , 338 A.2d 230 (1975); State v. Monteleone, 36 N.J. 93 , 175 A.2d 207 (1961); State v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Environmental Exchange v. Casella Waste Systems

    Superior Court of Maine · Oct 21, 2005

    Hall v. Board of Environmental Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me. 1985). See also Heber v. Lucerne-in Maine Village Co., 2000 ME 137,g 7,755 A.2d 1064, 1066. … p V. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 224-25 (1993). Further, in some circumstances, failure to provide access to an essential facility may amount to anticompetitive conduct. 2 Antitrust Laws $ 26.01 131.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Venable v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.

    603 F. Supp. 2d 211 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 20, 2009

    See Laurin v. … T-Mobile claimed that because the Unemployment Board’s decision is inadmissible, an employer's letter to the Board would be inadmissible too. T-Mobile, however, waived this objection for purposes of the pending motion.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re Nadeau

    914 A.2d 714 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 30, 2007

    See Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 , 110 S.Ct. 2695 , 111 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990); Levinsky’s, Inc. v. … Times Co. v. Sullivan, 876 U.S. 254 , 84 S.Ct. 710 , 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964), and extended to the arena of political campaigns in Brown v. Hartlage, 456 U.S. 45 , 102 S.Ct. 1523 , 71 L.Ed.2d 732 (1982). E.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.