Case law

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Fleming

132 N.C. 332 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1903

''fore the board of commissioners for the release of Burton are without authority and void, and do not release the defendant Burton from liability on the bond.” Clark v. Am. Surety Co., 171 Ill., 235 ; Wood v. … In Rudolph v.

State v. Wilkins

131 N.C. App. 220 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1998

After the mock trial, Public Defender Robert Brown advised defendant that he believed she would be found *222 guilty at trial and receive the maximum sentence. … A hearing on the motion was held on 9 December 1996, at which time Judge Hudson heard testimony from defendant and her employers as well as from Hughes and Brown.

State v. Green

2 N.C. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 14, 1968

Defendant contends State v. … This was clearly “the use or threatened use” of a firearm whereby the life of Mollie Brown was endangered or threatened, the offense charged in the indictment and a violation of G.S. 14-87.

Lee v. Tolson

166 N.C. App. 256 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 7, 2004

The hearing before the Review Board was held on 15 August 2001. The Board rendered a decision affirming the Assistant Secretary's decision on 9 November 2001. … See, e.g., Reap v.

State Ex Rel. Rhodes v. Hampton

101 N.C. 629 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1888

of any county has abolished the office of County Treasurer, the said board shall have like power to re-establish the same, if, in the judgment of the board, the public interests so require.” … As. then, the office of Treasurer was, by the vote of the -Justices, restored, and without an incumbent a vacancy existed —Cloud v. Wilson, 72 N.

Allen v. City of Greensboro

322 F. Supp. 873 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 19, 1971

Slochower v. Board of Higher Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956). … Hannah v. Larche, Supra; Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970).

Hildreth v. Intl. Paper

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 4, 2005

Russos v. Wheaton Indus ., 145 N.C. App. 164 , 551 S.E.2d 456 (2001). 3. … Stat. §§ 97-47 ; 97-25 ; Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co ., 252 N.C. 716 , 115 S.E.2d 27 (1960); Beard v. Blumenthal Jewish Home , 359 S.E.2d 261 , 87 N.C. App. 58 (1987); Scurlock v.

Fehlhaber v. State of North Carolina

445 F. Supp. 130 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 4, 1978

Air Pollution Variance Board v. Western Alfalfa Corporation, 416 U.S. 861 , 94 S.Ct. 2114 , 40 L.Ed.2d 607 (1974). … Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown, 354 U.S. 436 , 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 (1957). The court concludes that neither of these constructions is tenable. There is no authorization of padlocking.

Hoke v. BD. OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF STATE OF NC

445 F. Supp. 1313 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 23, 1978

North Carolina State Board of Education, 493 F.2d 1016 (4th Cir. 1974); Alabama Optometric Association v. Alabama State Board of Health, 379 F.Supp. 1332 (M.D.Ala.1974); cf. Mazzuco v. … Hoke v. Board of Medical Examiners, 395 F.Supp. 357 (W.D.N.C. 1975), relying on Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35 , 95 S.Ct. 1456 , 45 L.Ed.2d 712 (1975).

State v. Wright

206 N.C. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 2010

In Henry v. … In State v. Ward, 354 N.C. 231, 243 , 555 S.E.2d 251, 260 (2001) (quoting State v.

Orange Trust Co. v. Hayes

191 N.C. 542 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1926

Hall v. Tillman, 110 N. C., 220 . Tbe judgment, therefore, should have followed tbe statute and the terms of tbe bond. Council v. Averett, 90 N. C., 168 . … Motor Co. v. Sands, 186 N. C., 732 ; Randolph v. McGowans, 174 N. C., 203 .

Barrett v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

192 N.C. 728 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1926

In Pigford v. R. R., 160 N. … Cherry v. R. R., 174 N. C., 263 ; Hines v. R. R., 185 N. C., 72 ; Crisp v. Thread Mills, 189 N. C., 89 ; Bradford v. English, 190 N. C., 742 ; Johnson v. R. R., 191 N. C., 75 ; Clinard v. Clinard Elec. Co., post, 736.

Bynum Ex Rel. Boyette v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ.

195 N.C. App. 777 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 17, 2009

An action against a commission or board created by statute as an agency of the State where the interest or rights of the State are directly affected is in fact an action against the State. Meyer v. … Defendant is a local board of education as defined in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 11505 (5) (2007). N.C. Gen.

Woolard v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

93 N.C. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1989

, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bundy v. Board of Education, 5 N.C. App. 397 , 168 S.E. 2d 682 (1969).

HEMPHILL NOLAN v. Town of Weddington

153 N.C. App. 144 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 17, 2002

Prac. 19; State v. Hamrick, 110 N.C. … See White Oak Properties, Inc. v.

State v. Davis

126 N.C. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1997

See U.S. v. … See Craig v. Buncombe Co. Board of Education, 80 N.C. App. 683, 684-85 , 343 S.E.2d 222, 223 (1986). Important, if not essential, nonpunitive purposes are served by administrative suspension and expulsion.

Reynolds v. . Flinn

2 N.C. 106 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1794

*Page 82 Cited: Strother v. Cathey , 5 N.C. 165 ; Tyrrell v. Mooney, ib. , 402; Waugh v. Richardson , 30 N.C. 471 ; Lovingood v. Burges , 44 N.C. 407 ; Brown v. Brown , 103 N.C. 216 ; Doon v. Lumber Co. , 128 N.C. 88 .

Johnston v. Evans

223 F. Supp. 766 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 25, 1963

B. v. Manning, Maxwell and Moore, Inc., 218 F.Supp. 702, 705 (W.D.La.1963), citing Douds v. … B. v. Manning, Maxwell and Moore, Incorporated, (W D.La.1963), 218 F.Supp. 702 .

In Re License as a Practicing Psychologist of Partin

37 N.C. App. 302 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 1978

Ramsey v. Veterans Commission, 261 N.C. 645 , 135 S.E. 2d 659 (1964). … Ramsey v. Veterans Commission, supra at 647, 135 S.E. 2d at 661 .

Orinoco Supply Co. v. Masonic & Eastern Star Home

163 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 12, 1913

Brown, J. Tbis is an action brought by tbe plaintiffs to subject tbe property of tbe defendant to a lien for material fur *515 nished to tbe Auge Construction. … See, also, Rex v. Justices of Middlesex, 2 B. and A., 818; Townsend v. Brown, 24 N. J., 86. In Farmers Bank v. Hail, 59 N.