Case law

John T. Brown v. United States of America, George C. Carter v. United States of America, Benjamin T. Thornton v. United States of America, Charles J. Thornton v. United States of America, Carlton Bryant v. United States

299 F.2d 438 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 6, 1962

BROWN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. George C. CARTER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Benjamin T. THORNTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Charles J. … THORNTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Carlton BRYANT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Nos. 16135-16139. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Hospital Menonita de Guayama, Inc. v. NLRB

94 F.4th 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 27, 2024

The Sixth Circuit denied enforcement of the Board’s order, finding “no basis” for the Board’s holding. Landmark Int’l Trucks, Inc. v. NLRB, 699 F.2d 815, 818 (6th Cir. 1983). … Avecor, Inc. v. NLRB, 931 F.2d 924, 928 (D.C. Cir. 1991). Rather, “[i]t is our responsibility to examine carefully both the Board’s findings and its reasoning.” Id. (quoting Peoples Gas Sys., Inc. v.

Associated Press v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

265 F. Supp. 3d 82 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 30, 2017

(Declaration of Jay Ward Brown (“Brown Deck”) Ex. J, at AP-19-AP-23). … As the court in Mayer Brown LLP v.

Miles v. District of Columbia

354 F. Supp. 577 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 1973

Board of Trustees of Town of Las Vegas, 232 U.S. 604 [ 34 S.Ct. 443 , 58 L.Ed. 751 ]; Roller v. Holly, 176 U.S. 398 [ 20 S.Ct. 410 , 44 L.Ed. 520 ].” Mullane v. … V. 1972). 3 . See Wolpe v. D.

Food Store Employees Union, Local 347, Amalgamated Meat Cutters And Butcher Workmen Of North America, Aflcio v. National Labor Relations Board

422 F.2d 685 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1969

In exercising this judgment the Board owed no deference to its trial examiner. Cf. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 494-496 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers v. … Workers v. NLRB, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 389, 298 F. 2d 297 , 303 (1961) cert. denied, Gulf Bottlers Inc. v. NLRB, 369 U.S. 843 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 847 , (1962); see also NLRB v.

Hancock v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance

472 A.2d 867 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 1984

See Bolling v. … Because this case preceded the effective date of the Court Reorganization Act of 1970, it is binding on this court. *871 Compare Brown v.

Brooks v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

453 A.2d 812 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1982

See Howell v. Commonwealth Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 51 Pa.Commw. 26, 413 A.2d 782 (1980); Bigley v. Commonwealth Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 38 Pa.Commw. 569, 393 A.2d 1312 (1978). … No medical evidence was presented, Howell v. Commonwealth Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra, and no request for transfer was made, Bigley v. Commonwealth Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra.

In Re Pelkey

962 A.2d 268 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2008

REID, Associate Judge: The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that respondent Bruce A. … In re Gil, 656 A.2d 303, 305 (D.C.1995) (quoting Fredericks v. United States, 306 A.2d 268, 270 (D.C.1973)). 20 . In re Gil, supra note 19, 656 A.2d at 306 (quoting In re Kennedy, 542 A.2d 1225, 1228 (D.C.1988)). 21 .

Manago v. District of Columbia

934 A.2d 925 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2007

See Ibrahim v. University of the District of Columbia, 742 A.2d 879 , 881 n. 3 (D.C.1999) (“UDC proper [as distinguished from the Board of Trustees] ... is not sui juris.”). Super. Ct. Civ. … Second, the only proper defendant for this claim would be the Board of Trustees of the university, see D.C.Code § 38-1202.01(a), and, as we have seen, the Board was not properly served with the complaint.

State of Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Medicaid & Medical Assistance v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

272 F. Supp. 3d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 8, 2017

Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC, 280 F.3d 1027, 1038 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Adams Fruit Co. v. … United States v.

In Re Krouner

920 A.2d 1039 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 2007

We review the Board’s recommendation in accordance with D.C. Bar R. … If The Board decides that it does, that is the end of the inquiry; The Board must recommend disbarment. (Emphasis in original). 6 .Respondent’s reliance on United States v.

District of Columbia Workmen's Compensation Act. v. Frank Kelly, Inc.

554 F.2d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 4, 1976

Bruner v. United States, supra note 17; Smallwood v. Gallardo, supra note 17 ; Hallowell v. Commons, supra note 17 ; Insurance Co. v. … Udall, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 359 F.2d 615 (1965). 28 O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483, 487 (1951); Cardillo v. Liberty Mut. Ins.

In re Sherlock v. Grigsby

167 A.3d 551 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 2017

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 16-BG-1069 IN RE SHERLOCK V. GRIGSBY, Respondent. … We therefore accept the Board’s recommendation. D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (h)(2). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that respondent Sherlock V.

Elizabeth Schacht v. Steven Lieberman

103 F.4th 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 4, 2024

Olivares v. TSA, 819 F.3d 454, 463 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (quoting Tourus Recs., Inc. v. DEA, 259 F.3d 731, 737 (D.C. … Taking the Board’s order as a whole, the Board adequately explained why it believed no alternative penalty would redress Dr. Schacht’s unprofessional conduct. See Robinson v.

Jackson v. Mabus

919 F. Supp. 2d 117 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2013

Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see Kreis v. Sec’y of Air Force, 406 F.3d 684, 686 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (applying the APA to a denial of a request for reconsideration). … Dickson, 68 F.3d at 1404 (citing Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 286 (1974). Here, the Board failed to provide even the barest explanation for its decision.

Swinton v. J. Frank Kelly, Inc.

554 F.2d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1976

Section 15 of the amending act replaces the old § 921(b) with the new § 921(b) relating to the Benefits Review Board. . Undeniably, if the District Court lost jurisdiction, we also are without jurisdiction. Bruner v. … O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483, 487 (1951); Cardillo v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., supra note 1. . Mitchell v.

Techniarts Video, Inc. v. 1631 Kalorama Associates

572 A.2d 1051 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1990

Brown, 395 A.2d 50, 52 (D.C.1978); Garces v. Bradley, 299 A.2d 142, 144 (D.C.1973). … Pollock v. Brown, supra, 395 A.2d at 52 ; see also Peek v.

Horn v. Huddle

647 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 2009

In re Sealed Case, 494 F.3d at 159 (Brown, J.) (dissenting in part) (citing Bareford v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 973 F.2d 1138, 1144 (5th Cir.1992)). … Brown’s Resp. [468] at 2.)

In re Dana W. Johnson

103 A.3d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 2014

XI, § 16 (c). 1 Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. … The Board then directed Mr.

Smith v. Dalton

927 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 1996

See Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 , 103 S.Ct. 2362, 2367 , 76 L.Ed.2d 586 (1983); Horn v. Schlesinger, 514 F.2d 549, 553 (8th Cir.1975); King v. … See Bartman v. Cheney, 827 F.Supp. 1, 2 (D.D.C.1993). 41 . Id. 42 . Id. at 2 . 43 . See e.g., Vietnam Veterans v. Sec. of the Navy, 843 F.2d 528 (D.C.Cir.1988); Bozin v.