Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

4.01s

  • Dunn v. . Clerk's Office

    176 N.C. 50 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1918

    Tbe latter case was approved in Long v. Walker, 105 N. C., 97. See, also, Brown v. House, 116 N. C., 859 ; Merritt v. Merritt, 2 N. C., 20; Speller v. Speller, 119 N. C., 358 ; Andrews v. Whisnant, 83 N. … Tbe point is further considered and decided in Bailey v. Brown, 105 N. C., 129 ; Ballard v. Gay, 108 N. C., 544 ; S. v. Nash, 109 N. C., 822 . It was held in Ballard v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Lemus

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 18, 2020

    STATE V. … The school board appealed the denial of its sanctions motion to this Court, but the Court rejected the board’s arguments and affirmed the trial court’s order. State v. Lemus, __ N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Howie v. Byrd

    396 F. Supp. 117 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 14, 1975

    The Supreme Court of the United States in Jones v. … ,’ United States v.

    Reversed by Howie v. Byrd, 532 F.2d 750 (1976)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Martini v. COMPANION PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

    363 N.C. 805 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2010

    MARTINI, Plaintiff v. COMPANION PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 323A09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 28, 2010. Henry W. Gorham, Burley B. … Scott Brown, for Douglas J. Martini. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 679 S.E.2d 156 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Insurance Co. v. . Carolina Beach

    216 N.C. 778 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1940

    Wheeler v. Construction Co., supra . In Sexton v. … In Collins v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. North Carolina State Ports Authority

    332 F. Supp. 95 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 24, 1971

    See, e. g., Air Line Dispatchers Assn. v. National Mediation Board, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 24 , 189 F.2d 685 (1951); Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. National Mediation Board, 255 F.Supp. 466 (D.D.C.1966). … Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 64 S.Ct. 95, 104 (1943) (dissenting opinion). 3.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Varser

    239 N.C. 180 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1954

    Plaintiff, being dissatisfied with tbe ruling of the Board, made after bearing, seeks a judicial review, and a reversal of tbe action so taken by tbe Board. … If that be true, be would be entitled to have tbe Board act in tbe light of tbe true meaning of tbe term. McGill v. Lumberton, 215 N.C. 752 , 3 S.E. 2d 324 , and numerous cases cited in Shepard’s N. C.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Nokes v. . Shaw

    1 N.C. 576 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1803

    I am aware that it will be said the case of Brown v. Lutterloh, ante , 556, from Hillsborough, bears some analogy to this. … NOTE. — See Brown v. Lutterloh, ante , 556. *Page 492 (582)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Seraph Garrison, LLC v. Garrison

    2014 NCBC 28 · North Carolina Business Court · Jun 26, 2014

    Seraph Garrison, LLC v. Garrison, 2014 NCBC 28. … Johnson v. Owens, 263 N.C. 754, 757, 140 S.E.2d 311, 313 (1965).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Southern R. R. Co.

    149 N.C. 108 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1908

    C., 434 ; and Tayloe v. Parker, 137 N. C., 418 . See also Gulledge v. R. R., at this term (on rehearing), where the question is fully considered by Justice Brown, with a full citation of the authorities. … It appears in Brown v. R.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Yarbrough v. East Wake First Charter School

    108 F. Supp. 3d 331 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 24, 2015

    In early 2012, some EWA Board members learned of Smith’s alleged sexual harassment, and two board members raised the issue at a board meeting. Id. ¶ 41 . … The EWA Board took no actions at the meeting, and Smith asked the Board to sanction the two board members who raised the issue. Id. ¶ 42 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Blair Investments, LLC v. Roanoke Rapids City Council

    231 N.C. App. 318 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 17, 2013

    Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 623 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 381 (1980) (quoting Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 467 , 202 S.E. 2d 129, 135 (1974) (other citation omitted). … Howard at 246 , 558 S.E.2d at 227 (citing Gregory v. County of Harnett, 128 N.C. App. 161, 165 , 493 S.E.2d 786, 789 (1997), quoting Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen of Town of Garner, 139 N.C.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating Bureau

    29 N.C. App. 237 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1976

    Commissioners v. Commissioners, 186 N.C. 202 , 119 S.E. 206 (1923). As above noted, G.S. 58-27.2 (a) was enacted in 1949, while G.S. 58-131.1 was enacted in 1945. … Comr. of Insurance v. Automobile Rate Office, 29 N.C. App. 182 , 223 S.E. 2d *247 512 (filed 7 April 1976) ; Comr. of Insurance v. Rating Bureau, 28 N.C. App. 409 , 221 S.E. 2d 96 (1976).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re Lustgarten

    177 N.C. App. 663 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 2006

    Dep’t of Env’t & Natural Res. v. Carroll, 358 N.C. 649, 660 , 599 S.E.2d 888, 895 (2004) (quoting Watkins v. N.C. State Bd. of Dental Exam’rs, 358 N.C. 190, 199 , 593 S.E.2d 764, 769 (2004) and N.C. Gen. … Walker v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 100 N.C. App. 498, 502 , 397 S.E.2d 350, 354 (1990), disc. review denied, 328 N.C. 98 , 402 S.E.2d 430 (1991).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Goldsboro.

    135 N.C. 382 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 11, 1904

    The defendants rely upon the decision of this Court in Fawcett v. Mount Airy , 134 N.C. 125 , to sustain their resolution to issue the bonds without the approval of the voters of the city. … The facts set forth in the pleadings in this case, however, bring (384) it directly within the principle announced in Wadsworth v. Concord , 133 N.C. 587 .

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Cary Creek Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Cary

    207 N.C. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2010

    Partnership v. Town of Cary, — N.C. … “Findings of fact are an important safeguard against arbitrary and capricious action by the Board of Adjustment because they establish a sufficient record upon which this Court can review the Board’s decision.” Crist v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nat'l Surgery Ctr. Holdings, Inc. v. Surgical Inst. of Viewpoint, LLC

    2016 NCBC 37 · North Carolina Business Court · May 12, 2016

    See Lambe v. Smith, 11 N.C. … See generally Wood-Hopkins Contracting Co. v. N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rainey v. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

    361 N.C. 356 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 2007

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Noland Co. v. Hester

    190 N.C. 250 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 14, 1925

    In Hutchinson v. Comrs., 172 N. C., 844 , the Board of Commissioners of Iredell County, upon notice duly received, paid to a subcontractor (Lon Gr. … S., 2445, render the defendant, board of trustees, in its official capacity, civilly liable for any part of plaintiff’s uncollected claim? This precise question was before the Court in Warner v. Halyburton, 187 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Road Commissioners v. County Commissioners

    186 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 3, 1923

    Bramham v. Durham, 171 N. C., 196 -198. This decision quotes with approval from the opinion of Associate Justice Fields in U. S. v. Tyner, 78 U. … Kearney v. Vann, 154 N. C., 311 ; In re Applicants for License, 143 N.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.