Case law

Drevaleva v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 2025

But discrimination claims like Drevaleva’s do not independently give the Board jurisdiction. See Cruz v. Dep’t of Navy, 934 F.2d 1240, 1245–46 (Fed. … The Board does not have jurisdiction over probationary employees. See Castle v. Rubin, 78 F.3d 654, 658 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

Jackson v. Mabus

919 F. Supp. 2d 117 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2013

Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see Kreis v. Sec’y of Air Force, 406 F.3d 684, 686 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (applying the APA to a denial of a request for reconsideration). … Dickson, 68 F.3d at 1404 (citing Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 286 (1974). Here, the Board failed to provide even the barest explanation for its decision.

Swinton v. J. Frank Kelly, Inc.

554 F.2d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1976

Section 15 of the amending act replaces the old § 921(b) with the new § 921(b) relating to the Benefits Review Board. . Undeniably, if the District Court lost jurisdiction, we also are without jurisdiction. Bruner v. … O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483, 487 (1951); Cardillo v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., supra note 1. . Mitchell v.

Techniarts Video, Inc. v. 1631 Kalorama Associates

572 A.2d 1051 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1990

Brown, 395 A.2d 50, 52 (D.C.1978); Garces v. Bradley, 299 A.2d 142, 144 (D.C.1973). … Pollock v. Brown, supra, 395 A.2d at 52 ; see also Peek v.

Smith v. Dalton

927 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 1996

See Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 , 103 S.Ct. 2362, 2367 , 76 L.Ed.2d 586 (1983); Horn v. Schlesinger, 514 F.2d 549, 553 (8th Cir.1975); King v. … See Bartman v. Cheney, 827 F.Supp. 1, 2 (D.D.C.1993). 41 . Id. 42 . Id. at 2 . 43 . See e.g., Vietnam Veterans v. Sec. of the Navy, 843 F.2d 528 (D.C.Cir.1988); Bozin v.

Carl D. Pettyjohn v. United States

419 F.2d 651 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 19, 1969

In McNabb v. … Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Bailey v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 354 , 389 F. 2d 305 (1967). . Miranda v.

DHSC, LLC v. NLRB

944 F.3d 934 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 2019

Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1154 (2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). The Board’s decision easily clears that bar. 1. … We leave it to the Board to determine in compliance proceedings how its order can be carried out. See Bolivar Tee’s Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 61 F. App’x 711, 711 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Cap Santa Vue, Inc. v.

Kornitzky Grp., LLC v. Elwell

912 F.3d 637 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 2019

See Order, Wilson v. Cox, No. 12-5070 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 16, 2013); Order, Am. Tort Reform Ass'n v. OSHA , No. 12-1229 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 9, 2013); Order, Janko v. Gates, No. 12-5017 (D.C. Cir. … Oct. 9, 2013); Order, Mittleman v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, No. 12-1095 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 9, 2013); Order, Roane v. Leonhart, No. 12-5020 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 9, 2013); Order, United States v.

Roy E. Bowden v. United States

106 F.3d 433 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1997

Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967-68 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Bayer v. United States Dept. of the Treasury, 956 F.2d 330, 332 (D.C.Cir.1992). … As in Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d at 18 , for a combination of equitable considerations, we think the INS waived this defense.

Sellmon v. Reilly

551 F. Supp. 2d 66 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2008

V 16.) 3 . … See Fletcher v.

In Re Lickstein

898 A.2d 897 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 2006

Since we find that the record amply supports the Board’s findings, we accept those findings and adopt the Board’s recommended sanction. … In re Forde v. Nat’l Home Buyer Realty, Inc., No. 01-12296-SSM (Chapter 7) (Bankr.E.D.Va.2004). 2 . On September 24, 2004, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board imposed reciprocal discipline.

N. V. Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken v. Atomic Energy Commission

316 F.2d 401 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 21, 1963

Brown, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Ellsworth C. Alvord, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Edward A. … V.

Hoover H. Wright v. Eugene C. Paine, Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Eugene C. Paine

289 F.2d 766 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1961

Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 1945, 325 U.S. 410, 414 , 65 S.Ct. 1215, 1217 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 . The “courts can intervene only where legal rights are invaded or the law violated.” Chapman v. … Wright v. Seaton, Misc. 1403. 3 .

Martin Scahill & HRH Servs. LLC v. Dist. of Columbia

909 F.3d 1177 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 2018

ABC Board Order at 3 (May 18, 2016) (“2016 Board Order”). … Utah Wilderness All. v. Palma, 707 F.3d 1143, 1153 (10th Cir. 2013); Pollack v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 577 F.3d 736, 743 (7th Cir. 2009); Park v.

In Re Lewis

689 A.2d 561 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1997

Stemple in United States v. … Collins, 506 U.S. 1036 , 113 S.Ct. 820 , 121 L.Ed.2d 692 (1992); Montoya v. Texas, 506 U.S. 1088 , 113 S.Ct. 1070 , 122 L.Ed.2d 497 (1993); Montoya v.

McKoy-shields v. Finmarc Management, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2012

See Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal Service, 467 U.S. 512, 517-18 (1984) (suit against USPS requires waiver of sovereign immunity); see also Loeffler v. Frank, 486 U.S. 549, 554 (1988) (same). … v.

Gilbert v. James

134 F. Supp. 3d 42 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2015

See Harkness v. … In Harris v.

Stern v. Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & Missionaries

381 F. Supp. 1003 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1974

DePinto v. Provident Security Life Ins. … Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States, 323 U.S. 386, 409 , 65 S. Ct. 373 , 89 L.Ed. 322 (1945); Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.S. 321, 329-330 , 64 S. Ct. 587 , 88 L.Ed. 754 (1944); Swift & Co. v.

Byrd v. Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 3, 2024

Foreman v. Dep’t of Navy, 18-cv- 367 (TJK), 2019 WL 3767117, at *5 (D.D.C. Aug. 9, 2019) (citation omitted). “[T]he Board’s action must be supported by ‘reasoned decisionmaking,’” Haselwander v. … And if it “cho[se] to disregard” these reports, the Board needed to “expressly indicate that it ha[d] done so,” Rudo v. Geren, 818 F.

Gullo v. Hirst

207 A.2d 662 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1965

Gullo v. Gullo, 368 U.S. 988 , 82 S.Ct. 604 , 7 L.Ed.2d 526 , rehearing denied 369 U.S. 832 , 82 S.Ct. 844 , 7 L.Ed.2d 797 (1962). 3 . Gullo v. Gullo, D.C.App., 192 A.2d 126 (1963). 4 . Gullo v. … IV, 1965); Tendler v. Tendler, 56 App.D.C. 296 , 12 F.2d 831 (1926).