Case law

Montgomery v. Board of Education

188 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 5, 2003

In Aiken v. … Ass’n of Machinists v.

State Land Board v. Campbell

140 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1932

to which it is a party, the state is the real party in interest: State Land Board v. … Co. v. Bramwell, 108 Or. 261 , ( 217 P. 332 , 32 A. L. R. 829), and cases cited. In conformity to this rule, it was held in State Land Board v.

State Land Board v. Gennies

204 Or. 443 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1955

This is an appeal by Albert Gennies, et al., alleged to be the heirs at law of Henry Otto Genies, deceased, from a decree escheating the latter’s estate to the State Land Board. … The State Land Board brought an escheat proceeding in the county court pursuant to § 21-101, OCLA, as amended by ch 105, Oregon Laws 1943, ORS 120.030, whereupon Albert Gennies, the alleged brother, and the alleged nephews

Brown v. Belcrest Memorial Park Ass'n

149 Or. 625 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1935

State Land Board v. Braun

167 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1941

No cross-interrogatories were submitted by counsel representing the state land board. … In view of this presumption (State v.

Yankee v. Oregon Medical Board

280 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 2016

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a default final order of the Oregon Medical Board (the board) that revoked petitioner’s license to practice medicine and assessed a civil penalty. … The board responds that “the rule required the board determine, as a factual matter, whether there was any dispute over petitioner’s reasons for not appearing at the hearing,” and that the board correctly stated and applied

Severy v. Board of Parole

118 Or. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1993

In August, 1988, petitioner filed for administrative review of the Board’s order, asserting that the Board should have “unsummed” the consecutive sentences. The Board granted the request for review. … See Jamison v. Cupp, 27 Or App 109 , 555 P2d 475 (1976). He should be permitted to petition for a rehabilitation hearing at any time after July, 2005. Petitioner’s remaining assignments are without merit.

Martz v. Board of Parole

301 Or. 400 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1986

Like the petitioner in Price v. … Board of Parole, 301 Or 393 , 723 P2d 314 (1986), this petitioner argued to the Court of Appeals and to this court that the Board of Parole (Board) “abused its discretion” by not overriding the minimum sentence imposed by

Sowell v. Workmen's Compensation Board

2 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 11, 1970

In Re Clark, 79 Or 325 , 154 P 748 , 155 P 187 (1916); State ex rel Venn v. Reid, 207 Or 617 , 298 P2d 990 (1956); and Johnson v. Craddock et al, 228 Or 308 , 365 P2d 89 (1961). … In Riesland v.

Harrington v. Board of Trustees

100 Or. App. 733 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 1990

McCay v. Linn County, 90 Or App 271 , 752 P2d 323 (1988); Pounds v. Board of Trustees, 89 Or App 552, 555 , 749 P2d 1227 (1988). … Lewis v. Dept. of Rev., 294 Or 139, 142 , 653 P2d 1265 (1982); Mayer/Kelinknecht v. Bassett, 263 Or 334, 348 , 501 P2d 782 *738 (1972).

Miller v. Board of Parole

115 Or. App. 91 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1992

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of our decision dismissing his petition for review of an order of the Board of Parole. 111 Or App 662 , 825 P2d 663 (1992). … See Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507 , 834 P2d 547 (1992). We conclude that petitioner’s claims of error are not well taken and do not require discussion. Reconsideration allowed; opinion withdrawn; affirmed.

Dinkins v. Board of Accountancy

118 Or. App. 220 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 17, 1993

The Board relies, inter alia on Trebesch v. Employment Division, 300 Or 264 , 710 P2d 136 (1985), Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Employment Div., 105 Or App 233 , 804 P2d 1133 , rev den 311 Or 433 (1991), and Sun Veneer v. … Also, relying on McKay v.

Thomsen v. Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 10, 2024

Further, the board argues that this case is like Lewis-Taylor v. … Co. v.

State Land Board v. Davidson

147 Or. 504 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1934

In the instant case, the bonds and other obligations of respondent being prior in time to the mortgage of the State Land Board, different principles apply. In State Land Board v. … Co. v. Cowden, supra.

Brown v. Portland School District No. 1

48 Or. App. 571 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1980

We concluded in Yunker v. … See Dowers Farms v.

Brown v. United States National Bank

265 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1973

The writer then concludes: “It is' not clear from the opinion of Cordon v. Gregg what scope the court intends the doctrine to have.” ② With this ambiguity as to the holding in Cordon v. … Waterway Terminals v. P. S. Lord, 242 Or 1 , 406 P2d 556 , 13 ALR3d 1 (1965).

Plane v. Board of Parole

114 Or. App. 60 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 1992

We rejected that argument in Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507 , 834 P2d 547 (1992). Petitioner exhausted his administrative remedies. We have jursidiction. … Petitioner contends that the Board erred in finding aggravation under factor O — consecutive sentences.

Dingman v. Board of Parole

114 Or. App. 516 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 5, 1992

Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507, 510 , 834 P2d 547 (1992). Petitioner challenges the condition barring him from entering or residing in Polk or Yamhill counties during the period of parole supervision. … Owens v. Board of Parole, supra, 113 Or App at 511-12 . See also State v. Ferre, 84 Or App 459, 461-62 , 734 P2d 888 (1987).

Brown v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.

622 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 3, 1985

Brown, brought this action pro se, contending that defendants violated the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 in improperly selling plaintiff a stock option. Plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages. … Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 597 , 68 S.Ct. 715, 719 , 92 L.Ed. 898 (1948) (emphasis added). Res judicata applies when there is a valid, final judgment on the merits. 18 C. Wright & A.

Fields v. Workmen's Compensation Board

26 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 1976

Com., 227 Or 562 , 362 P2d 371 , 363 P2d 563 (1961); Hoffmeister v. State I. A. Com., 176 Or 216, 223-24 , 156 P2d 834 (1945); Verban v. State Ind. Acc. Com., supra; Bowser v. … Dodd v. Ind. Acc. Com., 211 Or 99, 107 , 310 P2d 324 , 311 P2d 458 , 315 P2d 138 (1957); Dinnocenzo v. SAIF, 18 Or App 63, 69 , 523 P2d 1280 (1974); Bowser v. Evans Products Co., supra, 17 Or App at 545 .