Case law

State v. Green

2 N.C. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 14, 1968

Defendant contends State v. … This was clearly “the use or threatened use” of a firearm whereby the life of Mollie Brown was endangered or threatened, the offense charged in the indictment and a violation of G.S. 14-87.

Browning v. MAURICE B. LEVIEN & CO., PC

300 N.C. 371 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1980

267 S.E.2d 673 (1980) 300 N.C. 371 Norman BROWNING, John Hubly, James Thorton, Hilda Reich, Harrold Gobeille, David Weisbert, Harry Shrier, Joseph Shrier, Eugene Bohlander, Howard Guggenheim, Paul Eckelberry, Eugene Kandel … Browne, Joseph Thomas, Robert Hays and Joe Fassett v. MAURICE B. LEVIEN & CO., P. C; Maurice B. Levien; Maurice B. Levien & Co.; and Maurice Levien Associates. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 3, 1980.

Mitchell v. Mitchell

270 N.C. 253 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1967

Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1 , 95 S.E. 2d 118 ; Stanley v. Stanley, 226 N.C. 129 , 37 S.E. 2d 118 ; Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556 , 31 S.E. 2d 529 . … Bunn v. Bunn, 262 N.C. 67 , 136 S.E. 2d 240 ; Stancil v. Stancil, 255 N.C. 507 , 121 S.E. 2d 882 ; Edmundson v. Edmundson, 222 N.C. 181 , 22 S.E. 2d 576 ; Davis v. Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 . See Smith v.

Ashe Cnty. v. Ashe Cnty. Plan. Bd.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 18, 2020

v. … V. ASHE CNTY. PLAN. BD. Opinion of the Court more closely resembles Raleigh Rescue Mission, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of City of Raleigh (In re Historic Oakwood), 153 N.C.

Simmons v. City of Elizabeth City

197 N.C. 404 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1929

Corp. (2 ed.), sec. 395; S. v. Thomas, 118 N. C., 1221 ; Wharton v. Greensboro, 146 N. C., 356 . … Ward v. Elizabeth City, 121 N. C., 1 ; Wood v. Bellamy, 120 N. C., 212 . But in Ward v. Elizabeth City, approving Hoke v.

Pearce v. . Pearce

226 N.C. 307 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1946

S., 50-7 (4); Jackson v. Jackson, 105 N. C., 433 ; Green v. Green, 131 N. C., 533 ; Coble v. Coble, 55 N. C., 392 . Under this section of the code allegation of actual physical violence is not required. Coble v. … Taylor v. Taylor, 225 N. C., 80 ; Pharr v. Pharr, 223 N. C., 115 , 25 S. E. (2d), 471 ; Byers v. Byers, 223 N. C., 85 , 25 S. E. (2d), 466 ; Brown v. Brown, 213 N. C., 347 , 196 S. E., 333 ; Page v. Page, 161 N.

State v. . Smith

221 N.C. 400 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1942

Ayers said to Brown, "Let's go, two of them are Harris drivers and they might call Charlotte and we might have trouble." On leaving Mack's Place, Ayers got in the sleeper and Brown was driving. … Howard Brown testified: "One car pulled up to the side of the trailer and shot down my left rear tractor outside tire. I stopped on the shoulder of the road. . . .

Lee v. Simpson

44 N.C. App. 611 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1980

This civil action brought by certain Union County property owners against the county, the county board of commissioners and the county planning officer sought to have a certain rezoning action by the board of commissioners … Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 467-68 , 202 S.E. 2d 129, 135 (1974); George v. Town of Edenton, 294 N.C. 679 , 242 S.E. 2d 877 (1978).

State v. Ellington

18 N.C. App. 273 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 23, 1973

In Draper v. … T*wo of them will be Blue Sky-way, 1 will be a brown sky-way, and the other will be a brown Ventura. All of them will have combination locks.

In Re Guess

95 N.C. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1989

From these findings the Board concluded that Dr. … ,” State v.

State v. . Baynes

222 N.C. 425 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1942

However, where an ordinance is adopted by the governing board of a municipality and that fact is shown, there is a presumption in favor of the validity of the ordinance. Durham v. R. R., 185 N. C., 240 , 117 S. E., 17 . … The governing board of a town, city or county has the right to have its minutes speak the truth and to that end may amend its records. Power Co. v. Clay County, 213 N. C., 698 , 197 S. E., 603 ; R. R. v. Reid, 187 N.

Bentley v. Mgm Transport Company

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 9, 1997

Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , ___ N.C. App. ___, 477 S.E.2d 197 , 202 (1996); Franklin v. Broyhill Furniture Industries , 123 N.C. App. 200 , 205 , 472 S.E.2d 382 , 386 (1996). 2. … Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 477 S.E.2d 197 , 202 (1996). 3.

Hutaff v. . Adrian

112 N.C. 259 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1893

Capehart v. Biggs, 77 N. C., 261 ; Fox v. Kline, 85 N. C., 173 . The Court will, therefore, not interpose by injunction merely to prevent a cloud upon the title. Southerland v. Harper, 83 N. C., 200 ; Browning v. … Purnell v. Vaughan, 77 N. C., 268 ; Capehart v. Biggs, supra; Pritchard v. Sanderson, 84 N. C., 299 ; Harrison v. Bray, 92 N. C., 488 ; Gooch v. Vaughan, Ibid., 610. No Error.

City of Winston v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.

158 N.C. 512 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 1912

Ross v. Lipscomb, 83 S. C., 156; Johnston v. Roddy, 83 S. C., 462; Rea v. City of LaFayette, 130 Ga., 771 ; City of Bethany v. Allen, 186 Mo., 673 ; Gas and Water Co. v. City Alyria, 57 Ohio St., 374 ; Williams v. … People, 132 Ill., 583 ; Supervisors v. R. R., 21 Ill., pp. 338-373; Lewis v. Commissioners, 12 Kan., 186 ; Leavenworth v. Wilson, 69 Kan., 74 ; McMillan v. Lee County, 3 Iowa, 311 ; Stern v.

Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton Mills

177 N.C. 412 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 14, 1919

Anderson v. Anderson, 42 Vt., 352 ; Gardner v. Board of Education, 5 Dakota, 259 . It is settled by many well-adjudged cases, especially by the case of Cross v. … Doyle v. Brown, 72 N. C., 393 ; Rackley v. Roberts, 147 N. C., 201 ; McDonald v. Hoffman, 153 N. C., 254 . Jurisdiction is presumed where the contrary does not appear on the record. Bernard v. Brown, 118 N.

Cheatham v. . Rowland

105 N.C. 218 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1890

Patton v. Baird, 7 Ired. Eq., 255 ; Osborne v. Calvert, 83 N. C., 365 ; 2 Greenleaf on Ev., sec. 69; Kyd on Awards, 381. … Osborn v. Calvert, supra; Brown v. Brown, 4 Jones, 123 ; Walker v. Walker, 1 Winst., 258. The evidence produced went directly to so prove, and there was no evidence to the contrary.

Swain v. . McRae

80 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1879

We refrain from saying more on this subject as it is fully discussed in O’Hara v. Powell, ante 103. … to be in the case of Moore v.

State Ex Rel. Corporation Commission v. Transportation Committee of the North Carolina Commission

198 N.C. 317 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 12, 1930

S. v. Steele, 106 N. C., 766 ; Money v. Hotel Co., 174 N. C., 508 . In Pickett v. Kuchan, 49 A. L. R. … Brown v. J. H. Bell Co., 27 L. R. A. 407 (Iowa).” The Congress of the United States, on 1 March, 1875, passed “An act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights.” 18 Stat., 335.

Hasty v. Bellamy

44 N.C. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1979

Since the power to hire teachers rests in the school board, G.S. 115-21; Johnson v. … If the latter were proved to be the case, no violation of G.S. 115-142(m)(2) would be established, since the superintendent is entitled to make such recommendations, see G.S. 115-21; G.S. 115-142(m)(2); Taylor v.

LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NORTH CAROLINA v. State

363 N.C. 805 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 28, 2010

STATE of North Carolina; Roy Cooper, Attorney General of North Carolina; State Board of Elections; and Gary O. Bartlett, as Executive Director of the State Board, Defendants. No. 479A09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. … Peters, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State Board of Elections. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 688 S.E.2d 700 .