Case law

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

581 F.2d 941 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1978

Kessler & Co. v. EEOC, 472 F.2d 1147 (5th Cir.) … See Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. EEOC, 435 F.Supp. 751 (D.D.C.1977).

Culp v. United States

486 A.2d 1174 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1985

Jackson v. United States, 357 A.2d 409, 411 (D.C. 1976). Such a defense, however, “must have some reasonable basis.” Id.; Gaetano v. … McGloin v. United States, 232 A.2d 90, 91 (D.C.1967).

Oscar H. Mendoza v. National Labor Relations Board

948 F.2d 781 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1991

MENDOZA, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 90-1589. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Oct. 2, 1991. Before BUCKLEY, D.H. … Substantially for the reasons appearing in the Board's decision, we agree with the Board's interpretation of the contract.

Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

673 F.2d 525 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1982

FCC v. … In Kollett v.

Sign and Pictorial Union Local 1175, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

419 F.2d 726 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 1969

Recognizing that where unilateral wage action of this kind is shown the inferences to be drawn from the evidence must be left to the Board, N.L.R.B. v. … B. v.

Goldsmith v. Clabaugh

6 F.2d 94 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1925

of the Act *96 of June 2, 1924 ( 43 Stat. 253 , 336), considered by us in Goldsmith v. … See, also, Hitchcock v. Smith, 34 App. D. C. 521, 529, and Turner v. Fisher, 222 U. S. 204, 208 , 32 S. Ct. 37 , 56 L. Ed. 165 .

Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. Webb

580 F.2d 496 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 1978

NLRB v. United Insurance Co., 390 U.S. 254, 256 , 88 S.Ct. 988, 989 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1968). See also Brown v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 699 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 441 , 34 L.Ed.2d 301 (1972); NLRB v. … Carey, 30 Ga.App. 378, 378 , 118 S.E. 445, 445 (1923); Richardson v. Browning, 61 Cal.App. 110, 113 , 214 P. 281, 283 (1923); State v.

Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. National Labor Relations Board

238 F.2d 38 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 25, 1956

In effectuating the policies of the Act the Board has a discretion not to exert jurisdiction to the limit of its power. National Labor Relations Board v. … The order of the Board will be set aside and the ease remanded to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. .

Eric Flannery v. Mark Eckenwiler

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 4, 2026

FLANNERY AND DRANE FLANNERY RESTAURANT, LLC, TRADING AS BIG BOARD, APPELLANTS v. … As the Court put it in Clark v.

United States v. Eddie M. Harrison

419 F.2d 691 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 8, 1969

Harrison v. United States, No. 16,391 (D.C.Cir. June 12, 1962). … Johnson v. United States, No. 21,851 (D. C. Cir. June 20, 1969); citing Thompson v. United States, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 39 , 405 F.2d 1106 (1968); Crawford *695 v.

Hmh Hospitals Corporation v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2025

Ass’n v. … In Ryan v.

Clydesdale, Inc. v. Wegener

372 A.2d 1013 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 3, 1977

Ass’n v. Pinkett, D.C.Mun. App., 85 A.2d 58 (1951); Valois, Inc. v. Thorne, D.C.Mun.App., 86 A.2d 530 (1952). … Ass’n v. Pinkett, supra at 61 (Hood, J., dissenting).

DHSC, LLC v. NLRB

944 F.3d 934 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 2019

Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1154 (2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). The Board’s decision easily clears that bar. 1. … We leave it to the Board to determine in compliance proceedings how its order can be carried out. See Bolivar Tee’s Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 61 F. App’x 711, 711 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Cap Santa Vue, Inc. v.

Edmonds v. United States

609 A.2d 1131 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1992

Dunn v. United States , 284 U.S. 390 , 393 , 52 S.Ct. 189 , 190 , 76 L.Ed. 356 (1932) (Holmes, J.); accord, e.g., United States v. Powell , 469 U.S. 57 , 105 S.Ct. 471 , 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984); Steadman v. … Chambers v. United States , 564 A.2d 26 , 31 (D.C. 1989); Shorter v. United States , 506 A.2d 1133 , 1135 (D.C. 1986).

Whitehead v. Alexander

439 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 1977

Sohm v. … See Colm v. Kissinger, 406 F.Supp. 1250 (D.D.C.1975) and Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977).

Feinerman v. Bernardi

558 F. Supp. 2d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2008

Corp. v. … Co. of Am. v.

Loya v. Sebelius

840 F. Supp. 2d 245 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2012

See Pl.’s Opp’n, Brown Dep. at 66. … In Brown’s deposition, she acknowledged that Loya had “asked to be moved back to the Portals building.” Pl.’s Opp’n, Brown Dep. at 66.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations Board

168 F.3d 509 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 26, 1999

We will “uphold the Board’s determination unless it has ‘acted arbitrarily or otherwise erred in applying'established law to the facts at issue.’ ” Pittsburgh Press Co. v. … National Treasury Employees Union v.

Chavous v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority

201 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2001

Petrus v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 581, 583 (5th Cir.1987) (citations omitted); see Ladd v. Equicredit Corp. of Am., No. CIV.A. 00-2688, 2001 WL 175236 , at *1 (E.D.La. Feb. 21, 2001); White v. … contract the Control Board entered with Greater Southeast (Count Three). .

United States ex rel. Shea v. Partnership

614 F. App'x 519 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 2015

JUDGMENT This cause came to be heard on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, vacating this court’s judgment and remanding for further proceedings in light of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. … Root Services v.