Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

9.24s

  • Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, Afl-Cio, and Food Handlers Local 425 v. National Labor Relations Board

    420 F.2d 148 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 2, 1969

    The Trial Examiner found from conflicting testimony that the increase was consented to by a union official having apparent authority to do so; and the Board adopted this finding. 1 *149 The Board also ruled that a claim of … On the evidence making up the record before the Board, we see no occasion to disturb the Board’s resolution of these issues and its dismissal of the complaint.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Arnold v. United States

    467 A.2d 136 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1983

    Brown v. … United States v. Johnson, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 54 , 433 F.2d 1160 (1970); Evans v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 122 , 232 F.2d 379 (1956). However, because Johnson and Evans have been effectively overruled by Brown v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • In Re Mitchell

    727 A.2d 308 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1999

    Reback, supra, 487 A.2d at 239 (quoting Andolsun v. Berlitz Schools of Languages of America, Inc., 196 A.2d 926, 927 (D.C.1964)). … Begier v. IRS, 496 U.S. 53, 59 , 110 S.Ct. 2258 , 110 L.Ed.2d 46 (1990).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Hoover H. Wright v. Eugene C. Paine, Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Eugene C. Paine

    289 F.2d 766 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1961

    Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 1945, 325 U.S. 410, 414 , 65 S.Ct. 1215, 1217 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 . The “courts can intervene only where legal rights are invaded or the law violated.” Chapman v. … Wright v. Seaton, Misc. 1403. 3 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • St. Agnes Medical Center v. National Labor Relations Board, District 1199c, National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, Afl-Cio, Intervenors

    871 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 1989

    Pedro’s, Inc. v. NLRB, 652 F.2d 1005, 1011 (D.C.Cir.1981). In NLRB v. … See also NLRB v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Independent Producers Group v. Library of Congress

    759 F.3d 100 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2014

    Before: ROGERS, BROWN and MILLETT, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MILLETT. … Cir. 1985) (“the Library [of Congress] is not an agency under the Administrative Procedure Act”), with Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board, 684 F.3d 1332, 1341-1342 (D.C.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. United States Navy

    697 F.3d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 2012

    Fowler v. … Id. at 125; see also United Christian Scientists v. Christian Science Board of Directors, 829 F.2d 1152, 1170–71 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Stephens v. US Airways Group

    555 F. Supp. 2d 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 2008

    Aktieselskabet, 525 F.3d at 17 n. 4; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “A complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.” Aktieselskabet, 525 F.3d at 17 n. 4. … Alexander v.

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by Stephens v. US Airways Group, Inc., 644 F.3d 437 (2011)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Nihiser v. White

    211 F. Supp. 2d 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2002

    In Klehr v. A.O. … Secondly, the Army’s decision to review the results of the 1992 RIF board for a second time appears to be committed exclusively to the discretion of the Army. Cf. Chaney v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Parks v. Giant Food of Maryland, LLC

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2018

    Brown v. Whole Foodsll/Ikt. Grp., Ii'zc., 789 F_3d l46, 152 (D.C_ Cir. 2015) (quoting Rz`chardson v. Unitea' Srates, l93 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C.Cir. 1999)). … Allz's-Chalmcrs Corp. v.-Lueck, 471 U.S. 202, 211 (1985)', Lingle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. England

    246 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 2007

    Laxalt v. McClatchy, 809 F.2d 885, 889 (D.C.Cir.1987). . … See Kalinoski v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Allina Health Services v. Thomas Price

    863 F.3d 937 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2017

    See Northeast Hospital Corp. v. Sebelius, 657 F.3d 1, 15 (D.C. Cir. 2011). … See, e.g., Via Christi Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Leavitt, 509 F.3d 1259, 1271 n.11 (10th Cir. 2007); Baptist Health v. Thompson, 458 F.3d 768, 776 n.9 (8th Cir. 2006); Omni Manor Nursing Home v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Caroline Herron v. Fannie Mae

    861 F.3d 160 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2017

    See Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Graham, 798 F.3d 1119, 1134 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002); Havilah Real Prop. Servs., LLC v. VLK, LLC, 108 A.3d 334, 345–46 (D.C. 2015). … Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C. 1978). Because Herron has not identified a valid business expectancy, her claim fails.

    Cited 119 timesPublished
  • Sloan v. Astrue

    538 F. Supp. 2d 152 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 2008

    E.g., Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705-06 (D.C.Cir.1986). … E.g., Brown v. Barnhart, 408 F.Supp.2d 28, 32 (D.D.C.2006) (citation omitted).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. District of Columbia

    631 A.2d 1205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1993

    Civil Aeronautics Board, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 341, 342 , 147 F.2d 152, 153 (1945). 14 Neither Jackson v. District of Columbia Employees’ Compensation Bd., 537 A.2d 576, 577 (D.C.1988) nor Totz v. … The School Board has not filed a brief on this issue, but relies instead on the PERB’s arguments. 12 . The Union relies heavily on Frain v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gullo v. Hirst

    207 A.2d 662 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1965

    Gullo v. Gullo, 368 U.S. 988 , 82 S.Ct. 604 , 7 L.Ed.2d 526 , rehearing denied 369 U.S. 832 , 82 S.Ct. 844 , 7 L.Ed.2d 797 (1962). 3 . Gullo v. Gullo, D.C.App., 192 A.2d 126 (1963). 4 . Gullo v. … IV, 1965); Tendler v. Tendler, 56 App.D.C. 296 , 12 F.2d 831 (1926).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Abadie v. Organization for Environmental Growth, Inc.

    806 A.2d 1225 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2002

    Fruin-Colnon Corp. v. … See Colton v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Sigler v. Mt. Vernon Bottling Co.

    158 F. Supp. 234 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 1958

    Co. v. Hooper, 160 U.S. 514, 515 , 16 S.Ct. 379 , 40 L.Ed. 515 ; Brown v. Commercial Fire Insurance Co., 21 App.D.C. 325 ; Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Kalin, 4 Cir., 81 F.2d 1003 . … This opinion is in accord with that expressed in Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • John T. Brown v. United States of America, George C. Carter v. United States of America, Benjamin T. Thornton v. United States of America, Charles J. Thornton v. United States of America, Carlton Bryant v. United States

    299 F.2d 438 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 6, 1962

    BROWN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. George C. CARTER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Benjamin T. THORNTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Charles J. … THORNTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Carlton BRYANT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Nos. 16135-16139. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Communications Workers of America v. NLRB

    994 F.3d 653 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 16, 2021

    In NLRB v. … Napleton 1050, Inc. v. NLRB, 976 F.3d 30, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2020) (quoting Constellium Rolled Prods. Ravenswood, LLC v. NLRB, 945 F.3d 546, 550 (D.C. Cir. 2019)); accord NLRB v. Peninsula Gen. Hosp. Med.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.