Case law

Carolina Power and Light Company v. Clark

243 N.C. 577 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 29, 1956

Telegraph Co., 172 N.C. 783 , 90 S.E. 941 ; Land Co. v. Traction Co., 162 N.C. 503 , 78 S.E. 299 ; Brown v. Power Co., 140 N.C. 333 , 52 S.E. 954 ; Olson v. U. S., 290 U.S. 623 , 78 L. Ed. 1236 ; Boom Co. v. … Phillips v. Telegraph-Cable Co., 130 N.C. 513 , 41 S.E. 1022 ; Hodges v. Tel. Co., 133 N.C. 225 , 45 S.E. 572 ; Brown v. Power Co., supra; Teeter v. Tel. Co., supra; Rouse v.

85' & Sunny

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 2021

Respondent argues that the Board correctly concluded that both  85’ AND SUNNY, LLC V. … LLC V.

State v. Greene

324 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 9, 1989

Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 293 S.E. 2d 569 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1982); State v. … State v. Brown, 320 N.C. 179, 224 , 358 S.E. 2d 1, 30 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 98 L.Ed. 2d 406 (1987).

Briggs v. City of Raleigh

166 N.C. 149 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1914

In Grey v. … Tbe notice recited tbat it was published by authority of tbe board of commissioners, and under instructions from them. In tbe case of Lawson v. Ry.

Oliver v. . Oliver

219 N.C. 299 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1941

See Brown v. Brown, 213 N. C., 347 , 193 S. … See Moore v. Moore, 130 N. C., 333 , 41 S.

Huang v. Ziko

132 N.C. App. 358 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 16, 1999

Plaintiff appealed to defendant University’s Board of Trustees and, then, to defendant Board. Defendant Board ultimately affirmed the Board of Trustees’ decision on 9 February 1990. … See Kolani v. Gluska, 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 257 (1998); Roden v. Wright, 611 So. 2d 333 (Ala. 1992).

Dull v. Dull

232 N.C. 482 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1950

Ellis v. Barnes, 231 N.C. 543 , 57 S.E. 2d 772 ; Edgerton v. Harrison, 230 N.C. 158 , 52 S.E. 2d 357 ; Boyd v. Campbell, 192 N.C. 398 , 135 S.E. 121 ; Willis v. Trust Co., 183 N.C. 267 , 111 S.E. 163 ; Springs v. … This view is supported by the decisions in Turner v. Turner, supra, and Williams v. Williams, supra. And, as stated in the Turner case, the principles announced in Roberson v.

Kindley v. Privette

241 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 24, 1954

Pentuff v. Park, 194 N.C. 146 , 138 S.E. 616 ; 33 Am. Jur., Libel and Slander sec. 75; 53 C.J.S., Libel and Slander sec. 39. In Simmons v. … Brown v. Lum ber Co., 167 N.C. 11 , 82 S.E. 961 ; Pentuff v. Brown, supra; Hall v. Hall, 179 N.C. 571 , 103 S.E. 136 ; Paul v. Auction Co., 181 N.C. 1 , 105 S.E. 881 ; Flake v. News Co., supra. And in Flake v.

Owenby v. . Power Co.

194 N.C. 129 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 25, 1927

In Warwick v. Ginning Co., 153 N. … Also in Brown v. Scofields Co., 174 N. C., 4 , Brown, J., *131 speaking for the Court, said: “Tbe place where plaintiff was standing when hurt was not a ‘place’ within the legal signification of that term.

Currier v. W. M. Ritter Lumber Co.

150 N.C. 694 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 21, 1909

Smith v. Lumber Co., 142 N. … Oye., 14; Soloman v. Sewerage Co., 142 N. C., 445 ; Edwards v. Railroad, 121 N. C., 490 .

In re Election of Cleveland County Commissioners

56 N.C. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1982

State v. McMorris, 290 N.C. 286 , 225 S.E. 2d 553 (1976). … See Green v. Briggs, 243 N.C. 745 , 92 S.E. 2d 149 (1956); Penland v. Town of Bryson City, 199 N.C. 140 , 154 S.E. 88 (1930); Riddle v. Cumberland County, 180 N.C. 321 , 104 S.E. 662 (1920); Starbuck v.

Paul v. . Washington

134 N.C. 363 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1904

S. v. Taft , 118 N.C. 1190 ; 32 L.R.A., 122 ; 54 Am. St., 768; S. v. Yopp , 97 N.C. 477 ; 2 Am. St., 305. … In Bailey v.

Cox v. Indian Head Industries, Inc.

187 F.R.D. 531 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · May 20, 1999

We cannot disagree with the proposition underlying the across-the-board rule — that [sexual harassment] is by definition class [harassment]. … Boley v. Brown, 10 F.3d 218, 223 (4th Cir.1993). “[E]ach putative class member’s claim for [ ] damages was inherently individualized and thus not easily amenable to class treatment.” Broussard, 155 F.3d at 342 .

Corum v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

205 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1933

Broadway v. Grimes, 204 N. C., 623 ; Brown v. Bottling Co., 200 N. C., 55 ; Harper v. Bulloch, 198 N. C., 448 ; Grant v. Bottling Co., 176 N. C., 256 ; Cashwell v. Bottling Works, 174 N. C., 324 . … In Pillars v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, 78 So. (Miss.), 365, the plaintiff sued the defendant for damages resulting from the chewing of a piece of Brown Mule tobacco in which a decomposed human toe was concealed.

Plemmer v. Matthewson

281 N.C. 722 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 31, 1972

See also Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155, 162 , 166 S.E. 2d 78, 83 (1969). Plaintiffs’ second contention is, in effect, that Princeville could only annex the area in question by complying with N. C. Gen. … McIntyre v.

The Umstead Coal. v. RDU Airport Auth.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2020

V. RALEIGH-DURHAM AIRPORT AUTH. Opinion of the Court Special Meeting of the Board, via email, to be held on 1 March 2019. … Veazey v.

Mims v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 2020

Brown, Crump, Vanore & Tierney, L.L.P., by Andrew A. Vanore, III, for defendants-appellees. HAMPSON, Judge. … Is determined by the person or Board designated by the county or municipal authority responsible for animal control to be potentially dangerous because the dog has engaged in one or more of the

State v. Kostick

233 N.C. App. 62 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 18, 2014

"In order to make this determination, this Court has required application of the three- prong test set out by the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 50, 61 L. … This Court has held that such measures are appropriate under the first prong of Brown. See State v. Nolan, 211 N.C.

In Re Guess

95 N.C. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1989

From these findings the Board concluded that Dr. … ,” State v.

Walker v. County of Randolph

251 N.C. 805 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1960

In Dennis v. … In the case of Hunt v.