Case law

Perales v. Office of the Clerk

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2026

See, e.g., Brown v. WMATA, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016) (dismissing a complaint sua sponte for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)); Hamrick v. United States, No. 10-cv-857, 2010 WL 3324721, at *1 (D.D.C. … See Brown, 164 F. Supp. 3d at 35. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

National Express & Transportation Co. v. Morris

15 App. D.C. 262 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1899

Justice Clifford in the case of Turnbull v. Payson, 95 U. S. 418, 421 , and certain subsequent cases, quoting and apparently following that dictum of the learned justice. It is-true, in the case of Finn v. Brown, 142 U. … Payson , or Finn v. Brown , or that of Hammond v. Straus , was the dictum of Mr. Justice Clifford at all essential to the decision of the case.

Matter of Laurins

576 A.2d 1351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1990

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY Bar Docket No. 177-89 In the Matter of: Aleksandrs V. … United States v. Laurins, 857 F.2d 529, 536-37 (9th Cir.1988). 2 .

Money v. Cullinane

392 A.2d 998 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1978

V 1975). … [Wells v. District of Columbia Board of Education, D.C.App., 386 A.2d 703, 706 (1978).]

Kelly v. United States

580 A.2d 1282 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1990

Agent Sauve then stepped closer to Kelly and Beard, reached into the shopping bag, and took out the brown paper bag. … When you have a brown paper bag in a shoe of something you are carrying, and you say, “I don’t know,” that immediately, I think, gives rise to a suspicion that it is contraband. Citing United States v.

In Re Coates

855 A.2d 1116 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2004

Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Coates, 376 Md. 699 , 831 A.2d 1042 (2003). This suspension was the result of respondent’s misconduct in two cases. … Respondent did not participate in the proceedings before the Board and has not filed any exceptions in this court to the Board’s recommendation. *1117 In light of the heightened deference we give the Board’s recommendation

Tripati v. Williams

759 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 1990

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C.1977) (citing 2A Moore, Federal Practice 118.13; 5 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1217). … Joseph v. Cannon, 642 F.2d 1373, 1385 (D.C.Cir.1981) (quoting 2A J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 9.03 at 9-20 to 9-24 (2d ed. 1980)).

United States v. Anthony Cutchin

956 F.2d 1216 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 1992

In response, Officer Taylor stopped a brown car in the area but did not detain it. … See United States v. Longmire, 761 F.2d 411, 417-18 (7th Cir.1985); United States v. Robinson, 536 F.2d 1298 (9th Cir.1976).

Snohomish County, Washington v. STB

954 F.3d 290 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 2020

Farm Lines v. … In Wedemeyer v.

Kincade v. Wah

38 A.2d 112 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1944

Larsen v. Northland Transportation Co., 292 U.S. 20 , 54 S.Ct. 584 , 78 L.Ed, 1096; Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309 , 122 F.2d 219 ; Smith & Gottlieb, Inc. v. Cheatham, D.C. Mun.App., 31 A.2d 676 ; Scholl et al. v. … Bedrosian v. Wong Kok Chung, D.C.Mun.App., 33 A.2d 811 . The judgment is reversed with instructions to grant a new trial. Reversed. Code 1940, § 11—735.

Meat Cutters Union Local 81 of Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. National Labor Relations Board

458 F.2d 794 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1972

B. v. … It is clear that the Board’s remedial order is within the broad discretion it is permitted under Section 10(c) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (c) (1970). See Phelps Dodge Corp. v. N. L. R.

Di Lella v. University of the District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of Law

570 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2008

Brown v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis., 844 A.2d 1113, 1118 (D.C.2004) (quoting Delaware State Coll. v. Ricks, 449 U.S. 250, 258 , 101 S.Ct. 498 , 66 L.Ed.2d 431 (1980)). … Board of Curators of Univ. of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78, 85 , 98 S.Ct. 948 , 55 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978) *10 (quoting Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 581 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975)).

Upmc Mercy v. Serbelius

793 F. Supp. 2d 62 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2011

SEC v. … Fund, Inc. v.

Zoob v. Jordan

841 A.2d 761 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 2004

Smith v. Acorn, 32 A.2d 252 (D.C.1943). Delivery is evidenced by acts or words or both. Ratsch v. Rengel, 180 Md. 196 , 23 A.2d 680 (1942). … Duggan v. Keto, 554 A.2d 1126, 1135-1136 (D.C.1989).

In re L.R.

640 A.2d 697 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1994

See, e.g., Shepard v. … See Willcher v. United States, 408 A.2d 67 (D.C.1979) (Willcher I); Gregory v. United States, 393 A.2d 132 (D.C.1978). . Cf.

Rendall-Speranza v. Nassim

932 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1996

See, e.g., Brown v. … Georgia Dept. of Revenue, 881 F.2d 1018 (11th Cir.1989) (former state employee properly permitted to amend civil rights complaint to add individual members of State Personnel board when board was served with original complaint

In re Rehberger

891 A.2d 249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2006

See Rehberger v. Georgia, 269 Ga. 576 , 502 S.E.2d 222, 223 (1998) (Rehberger I). Under Georgia law, “all felonies are crimes involving moral turpitude.” Id. … See Rehberger v. Georgia, 235 Ga. App. 827 , 510 S.E.2d 594 (1998) (Rehberger II). 4 Upon receiving a certified copy of the order of the Supreme Court of Georgia disbarring Mr.

Matter of Stanton

532 A.2d 95 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1987

The hearing committee which conducted a hearing on the petition and the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) have recommended that reinstatement be denied. … Bar Ethical Consideration 3-9 (“[I]t is improper for a lawyer to engage in practice where he is not permitted by law or by court order to do so.”); Bowles v.

Jackson v. United States

232 A.2d 576 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 10, 1967

See also Brown v. United States [ 125 U.S.App.D.C. 220 , 370 F.2d 485 ] No. 20,041, Decided November 10, 1966. … Walker v. United States, 124 U.S.App. D.C. 194, 363 F.2d 681 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 922 , 87 S.Ct. 922 , 17 L. Ed.2d 794 (1967); Hood v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 16 , 365 F.2d 949 (1966) ; Brown v.

State of Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Medicaid & Medical Assistance v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

272 F. Supp. 3d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 8, 2017

Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC, 280 F.3d 1027, 1038 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Adams Fruit Co. v. … United States v.