Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

5.74s

  • Ivey v. McMahan Bros. Pipeline

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 27, 2005

    Id .; Zanone v. RJR Nabisco, Inc. , 120 N.C. … Stat. §§ 97-2 (6); 97-47 ; Click v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Wright

    206 N.C. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 2010

    In Henry v. … In State v. Ward, 354 N.C. 231, 243 , 555 S.E.2d 251, 260 (2001) (quoting State v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Major Givens

    95 N.C. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1989

    State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 569 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 589 (1984). … Brown, 810 N.C. at 569, 313 S.E.2d at 589 .

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • In re DeLancy

    67 N.C. App. 647 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1984

    Utilities Comm. v. Oil Co., 302 N.C. 14, 21 , 273 S.E. 2d 232, 236 (1981). The petition for judicial review filed by Ms. … Porter v. Dept. of Insurance, 40 N.C. App. 376 , 253 S.E. 2d 44 , disc. rev. denied, 297 N.C. 455 , 256 S.E. 2d 808 (1979).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • CHAPEL HILL TITLE & ABSTRACT CO. v. Town of Chapel Hill

    362 N.C. 649 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 2008

    Chapel Hill Title & Abstract Co., Inc. v. Town of Chapel Hill, 190 N.C. App. -, -, 660 S.E.2d 667, 673 (2008). Based on the dissent in the Court of Appeals, petitioners appealed to this Court. … We therefore conclude that the Board erred by denying petitioners’ request for a variance.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Geitner Ex Rel. Southern Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Mullins

    182 N.C. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2007

    Floyd v. Integon Gen. Ins. Corp., 152 N.C. App. 445, 448 , 567 S.E.2d 823, 826 (2002). … V.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. . Fowler

    151 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1909

    MESSICK GROCERY CO. v . C. H. JONES (appellant), from Forsyth. Per Curiam , November 25. Affirmed. Louis M. Swink for plaintiff; Manly Hendren for defendant. J. H. BROWN, ADMR. (appellant), v . … SMITH CO. v . S. M. MEMBY (appellant), from Pitt. Per Curiam , February 24. Affirmed on authority of Norton v. McLaurin , 125 N.C. 185 ; Pepper v. Clegg , 132 N.C. 112 . Julius Brown for defendant. EDW.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Woolard v. North Carolina Department of Transportation

    93 N.C. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1989

    , the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bundy v. Board of Education, 5 N.C. App. 397 , 168 S.E. 2d 682 (1969).

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Piazza v. Kirkbride

    372 N.C. 137 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 2019

    E.g. , Moss v. Brown , 199 N.C. 189 , 192, 154 S.E. 48 , 49 (1930) ; see also Kinsey v. Spann , 139 N.C. … See Burlington Indus. v. Foil , 284 N.C. 740 , 758, 202 S.E.2d 591 , 603 (1974) ("The business and affairs of a corporation are ordinarily managed by its board of directors."

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • The Umstead Coal. v. RDU Airport Auth.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2020

    V. RALEIGH-DURHAM AIRPORT AUTH. Opinion of the Court Special Meeting of the Board, via email, to be held on 1 March 2019. … Veazey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilmington v. Bryan

    141 N.C. 666 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1906

    It appeared from the report that the defendant was by agreement associated with the city attorney in the collection of back taxes, and that the latter by resolution of the board of aldermen, concurred in by the board of audit … Booth v. Ratcliffe, 107 N. C., 6 ; Roberts v. Woodworking Co., supra; Curtis v. Piedmont Co., supra; Smith v. Stewart, 83 N. C., 408 ; King v. Brown, 2 Hill (N. Y.), 485; Barr v. Van Duyn, 45 Iowa, 228 ; Cox v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Norris

    284 N.C. 103 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1973

    Brown left at the place where the assaults occurred. The evidence was ample to go to *106 the jury and to sustain the verdicts. State v. Stephens, 244 N.C. 380 , 93 S.E. 2d 431 . … State v. Boykin, 255 N.C. 432 , 121 S.E. 2d 863; State v. Cofield, 247 N.C. 185 , 100 S.E. 2d 355 ; State v. Crocker, 239 N.C. 446 , 80 S.E. 2d 243 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Dewees v. Whisenant

    142 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 20, 1956

    Cones as such are almost invariably made of fiber board and are hollow on the inside. … Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37 , 23 L.Ed. 200 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoke v. BD. OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF STATE OF NC

    445 F. Supp. 1313 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 23, 1978

    North Carolina State Board of Education, 493 F.2d 1016 (4th Cir. 1974); Alabama Optometric Association v. Alabama State Board of Health, 379 F.Supp. 1332 (M.D.Ala.1974); cf. Mazzuco v. … Hoke v. Board of Medical Examiners, 395 F.Supp. 357 (W.D.N.C. 1975), relying on Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35 , 95 S.Ct. 1456 , 45 L.Ed.2d 712 (1975).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Erthal v. May

    223 N.C. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2012

    Hobby & Sons, Inc. v. … See A-S-P Associates v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Liptrap v. Coyne

    196 N.C. App. 739 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 2009

    Defendant, citing Montsinger v. … Defendant contends that this case is analogous to by Brown v. Ginn, 181 N.C.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. Evans

    223 F. Supp. 766 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 25, 1963

    B. v. Manning, Maxwell and Moore, Inc., 218 F.Supp. 702, 705 (W.D.La.1963), citing Douds v. … B. v. Manning, Maxwell and Moore, Incorporated, (W D.La.1963), 218 F.Supp. 702 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Royall v. Sawyer

    120 N.C. App. 880 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1995

    The court then ordered that the child “shall attend Phillips Andover Academy or another boarding school. . . with his father, the Defendant, paying fees and tuition.” … See Kennedy v. Kennedy, 107 N.C. App. 695, 703 , 421 S.E.2d 795, 799 (1992) (trial court may modify custody only upon a motion by either party or anyone interested); Smith v. Smith, 15 N.C.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Casey v. . Dare County

    168 N.C. 285 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1915

    Norfleet v. Staton, 73 N. C., 546 ; Van Amringe v. Taylor, 108 N. C., 196 . … DeBerry v. Nicholson, 102 N.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Visible Props.

    Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2022

    VISIBLE PROPS., LLC V. THE VILL. … Accordingly, we reject the Village of Clemmons’s argument and hold that the trial court erred by affirming the Board of VISIBLE PROPS., LLC V. THE VILL.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.