Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.74s
Ivey v. McMahan Bros. Pipeline
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 27, 2005
Id .; Zanone v. RJR Nabisco, Inc. , 120 N.C. … Stat. §§ 97-2 (6); 97-47 ; Click v.
Cited 0 timesPublished206 N.C. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 3, 2010
In Henry v. … In State v. Ward, 354 N.C. 231, 243 , 555 S.E.2d 251, 260 (2001) (quoting State v.
Cited 17 timesPublished95 N.C. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1989
State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 569 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 589 (1984). … Brown, 810 N.C. at 569, 313 S.E.2d at 589 .
Cited 24 timesPublished67 N.C. App. 647 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1984
Utilities Comm. v. Oil Co., 302 N.C. 14, 21 , 273 S.E. 2d 232, 236 (1981). The petition for judicial review filed by Ms. … Porter v. Dept. of Insurance, 40 N.C. App. 376 , 253 S.E. 2d 44 , disc. rev. denied, 297 N.C. 455 , 256 S.E. 2d 808 (1979).
Cited 3 timesPublishedCHAPEL HILL TITLE & ABSTRACT CO. v. Town of Chapel Hill
362 N.C. 649 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 2008
Chapel Hill Title & Abstract Co., Inc. v. Town of Chapel Hill, 190 N.C. App. -, -, 660 S.E.2d 667, 673 (2008). Based on the dissent in the Court of Appeals, petitioners appealed to this Court. … We therefore conclude that the Board erred by denying petitioners’ request for a variance.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGeitner Ex Rel. Southern Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Mullins
182 N.C. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2007
Floyd v. Integon Gen. Ins. Corp., 152 N.C. App. 445, 448 , 567 S.E.2d 823, 826 (2002). … V.
Cited 9 timesPublished151 N.C. 731 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1909
MESSICK GROCERY CO. v . C. H. JONES (appellant), from Forsyth. Per Curiam , November 25. Affirmed. Louis M. Swink for plaintiff; Manly Hendren for defendant. J. H. BROWN, ADMR. (appellant), v . … SMITH CO. v . S. M. MEMBY (appellant), from Pitt. Per Curiam , February 24. Affirmed on authority of Norton v. McLaurin , 125 N.C. 185 ; Pepper v. Clegg , 132 N.C. 112 . Julius Brown for defendant. EDW.
Cited 14 timesPublishedWoolard v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
93 N.C. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1989
, the Board of Transportation, and all other departments, institutions and agencies of the State. … Bundy v. Board of Education, 5 N.C. App. 397 , 168 S.E. 2d 682 (1969).
Cited 49 timesPublished372 N.C. 137 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 2019
E.g. , Moss v. Brown , 199 N.C. 189 , 192, 154 S.E. 48 , 49 (1930) ; see also Kinsey v. Spann , 139 N.C. … See Burlington Indus. v. Foil , 284 N.C. 740 , 758, 202 S.E.2d 591 , 603 (1974) ("The business and affairs of a corporation are ordinarily managed by its board of directors."
Cited 20 timesPublishedThe Umstead Coal. v. RDU Airport Auth.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2020
V. RALEIGH-DURHAM AIRPORT AUTH. Opinion of the Court Special Meeting of the Board, via email, to be held on 1 March 2019. … Veazey v.
Cited 0 timesPublished141 N.C. 666 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1906
It appeared from the report that the defendant was by agreement associated with the city attorney in the collection of back taxes, and that the latter by resolution of the board of aldermen, concurred in by the board of audit … Booth v. Ratcliffe, 107 N. C., 6 ; Roberts v. Woodworking Co., supra; Curtis v. Piedmont Co., supra; Smith v. Stewart, 83 N. C., 408 ; King v. Brown, 2 Hill (N. Y.), 485; Barr v. Van Duyn, 45 Iowa, 228 ; Cox v.
Cited 10 timesPublished284 N.C. 103 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1973
Brown left at the place where the assaults occurred. The evidence was ample to go to *106 the jury and to sustain the verdicts. State v. Stephens, 244 N.C. 380 , 93 S.E. 2d 431 . … State v. Boykin, 255 N.C. 432 , 121 S.E. 2d 863; State v. Cofield, 247 N.C. 185 , 100 S.E. 2d 355 ; State v. Crocker, 239 N.C. 446 , 80 S.E. 2d 243 .
Cited 4 timesPublished142 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 20, 1956
Cones as such are almost invariably made of fiber board and are hollow on the inside. … Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37 , 23 L.Ed. 200 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedHoke v. BD. OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF STATE OF NC
445 F. Supp. 1313 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Feb 23, 1978
North Carolina State Board of Education, 493 F.2d 1016 (4th Cir. 1974); Alabama Optometric Association v. Alabama State Board of Health, 379 F.Supp. 1332 (M.D.Ala.1974); cf. Mazzuco v. … Hoke v. Board of Medical Examiners, 395 F.Supp. 357 (W.D.N.C. 1975), relying on Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35 , 95 S.Ct. 1456 , 45 L.Ed.2d 712 (1975).
Cited 5 timesPublished223 N.C. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2012
Hobby & Sons, Inc. v. … See A-S-P Associates v.
Cited 17 timesPublished196 N.C. App. 739 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 2009
Defendant, citing Montsinger v. … Defendant contends that this case is analogous to by Brown v. Ginn, 181 N.C.
Cited 11 timesPublished223 F. Supp. 766 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 25, 1963
B. v. Manning, Maxwell and Moore, Inc., 218 F.Supp. 702, 705 (W.D.La.1963), citing Douds v. … B. v. Manning, Maxwell and Moore, Incorporated, (W D.La.1963), 218 F.Supp. 702 .
Cited 3 timesPublished120 N.C. App. 880 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1995
The court then ordered that the child “shall attend Phillips Andover Academy or another boarding school. . . with his father, the Defendant, paying fees and tuition.” … See Kennedy v. Kennedy, 107 N.C. App. 695, 703 , 421 S.E.2d 795, 799 (1992) (trial court may modify custody only upon a motion by either party or anyone interested); Smith v. Smith, 15 N.C.
Cited 9 timesPublished168 N.C. 285 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1915
Norfleet v. Staton, 73 N. C., 546 ; Van Amringe v. Taylor, 108 N. C., 196 . … DeBerry v. Nicholson, 102 N.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2022
VISIBLE PROPS., LLC V. THE VILL. … Accordingly, we reject the Village of Clemmons’s argument and hold that the trial court erred by affirming the Board of VISIBLE PROPS., LLC V. THE VILL.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna