Case law

National ATM Council, Inc. v. Visa Inc.

922 F. Supp. 2d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2013

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Its representation on the MasterCard board ended in 2003, and its representation on the Visa board ended in 2006. Id. Wells Fargo was represented on the companies’ boards “[d]uring parts of the relevant time period.”

Tripati v. Williams

759 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 1990

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C.1977) (citing 2A Moore, Federal Practice 118.13; 5 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1217). … Joseph v. Cannon, 642 F.2d 1373, 1385 (D.C.Cir.1981) (quoting 2A J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 9.03 at 9-20 to 9-24 (2d ed. 1980)).

Robinson v. Pezzat

83 F. Supp. 3d 258 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2015

See, e.g., Viilo v. Eyre, 547 F.3d 707, 710 (7th Cir.2008); San Jose Charter of the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club v. City of San Jose, 402 F.3d 962, 975 (9th Cir.2005); Brown v. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 638 F.Supp. 1479, 1488 (D.D.C.1986).

In Re Squillacote

790 A.2d 514 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2002

Indictment, United States v. Clark, Crim. No. 97-948-M (E.D.Va.). … In United States v.

In Re Sneed

673 A.2d 591 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 1996

TERRY, Associate Judge: The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that respondent, a member of our bar, be disbarred under D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1995) on the ground that he was convicted of a … See Wainwright v. Stone, 414 U.S. 21, 22 , 94 S.Ct. 190, 192 , 38 L.Ed.2d 179 (1973); Wiltcher v. United States, 408 A.2d 67, 73 (D.C.1979). 6 . In Texas and New York, Sneed was suspended for eighteen months.

United Transportation Union v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, Csx Transportation, Inc., Intervenor. Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America

114 F.3d 1242 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 1997

P 10,009 UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, Petitioner, v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and United States of America, Respondents, CSX Transportation, Inc., Intervenor. … Louis Mackall, V, Attorney, Surface Transportation Board, argued the cause for the respondents. Henri F. Rush, General Counsel, Surface Transportation Board, was on brief. John J. Powers, III, and Robert J.

De Leon v. Rhines

74 F.2d 477 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 3, 1934

Brown, with the assent of Mrs. Dumas, and assumed to pay and disehárge the second-trust note. This claim of the defendants is not supported by the facts or law of the ease. Shepherd v. May, 115 U. S. 505 , 6 S. … Ed. 456 ; Keller v. Ashford, 133 U. S. 610 , 10 S. Ct. 494 , 33 L. Ed. 667 ; Union Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hanford, 143 U. S. 187 , 12 S. Ct. 437 , 36 L. Ed. 118 . In Shepherd v.

Wolfgang Baenitz and Chemische Werke Witten v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents

363 F.2d 969 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1966

See, e. g.; Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37 , 42, 23 L.Ed. 200 (1875); Friend v. Burnham & Morrill Co., 55 F.2d 150, 151 (1st Cir. 1932). See also Dwinell-Wright Co. v. … Stieg v. Commissioner of Patents, Nov. 18, 1965. And see Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 210, 214 , 181 F.2d 280, 284 (1950); cf. L-O-F Glass Fibers Company v.

Betty G. Browning v. Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives

793 F.2d 380 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1986

GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: The court’s opinion in Browning v. Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, 789 F.2d 923 (D.C.Cir.1986), preserves this circuit’s prior decision in Walker v. … Assuring accurate testimony in such an important field is “directly related to the due functioning of the legislative process____” Browning *382 v. Clerk, U.S.

Texas Neighborhood Services v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

172 F. Supp. 3d 236 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2016

Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989); see also Kentucky v. … Alliance v. U.S.

In Re Berryman

764 A.2d 760 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2000

See Berryman v. Thorne, 700 A.2d 181 (D.C.1997). The Hearing Committee found that, “by depositing the estate funds of $939.84 into the Citizens Account, [Ms. … Inst. of Architects v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 594 A.2d 83, 87 (D.C.1991)). Thus, the Board owed no deference to the Hearing Committee’s finding of negligent misappropriation.

Wilhelmus v. Geren

796 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2011

Baker v. … This case is, accordingly, remanded to the Board so that it may consider the applicability of case AR200309457 in reaching its decision here. See, e.g., Kendall v.

Davis v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

481 A.2d 128 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1984

See Richland School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 459 A.2d 1358, 1360 (Pa.Cmwlth.1983); Patrick v. … See Bornstein v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 69 Pa.Cmwlth. 521, 523-24 , 451 A.2d 1053, 1055 (1982); Hansen v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 54 Pa.

Booth v. District of Columbia

701 F. Supp. 2d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2010

See Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 901 (D.C.Cir.2006). … (Pl.’s Opp’n [# 59] Ex. 3, Brown Affidavit ¶ 7.)

Moore v. Hartman

571 F.3d 62 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 2009

Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, HENDERSON and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE. … Eventually, Moore’s position gained traction, with several members of Congress pressing REI’s case with the USPS Board of Governors.

Beg Investments, LLC v. Alberti

85 F. Supp. 3d 54 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2015

In Gillmor v. … Ashcroft v. Al-Kidd, 131 S.

In Re Miller

883 A.2d 105 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2005

See Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Miller, Misc. Docket AG No. 13 (September Term 2004). … Bar Counsel filed a certified copy of the *106 Maryland reprimand order with this court, and we referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) to either recommend whether identical, greater or lesser

United States ex rel. Just v. Simon

62 F.2d 879 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1933

Appeal from a judgment in the Supreme Court of the District dismissing a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the board of education to appoint appellant to the position of teacher of English in the colored senior high … No. 11,777; Bardwell v. Purrington, 107 Mass. 419, 425 ), and for that reason ineligible. It is immaterial, therefore, whether the vacancy occurred on March 15 or on July 17,1931.

Fuller v. Alexander

440 F. Supp. 380 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 1977

See Colm v. Kissinger, 406 F.Supp. 1250 (D.D.C.1975) and Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … Knehans v.

Bergman v. Bouligny

82 A.2d 760 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1951

Stewart v. Claudius, 19 Cal.App.2d 349 , 65 P.2d 933 ; Hoadley v. Allen, 108 Cal.App. 468 , 291 P. 601 ; Hitchcock Military Academy v. Myers, 76 Cal.App. 473 , 245 P. 219 ; William v. … Stein, 100 Misc. 667 , 166 N.Y.S. 836 ; Vidor v. Peacock, Tex.Civ.App., 145 S.W. 672 ; Northwestern M. & N. Academy v. Wadleigh, 267 Ill.App. 1 ; Dwyer v. Cashen, 232 Ill.App. 493 . See also Holton v.