Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1951

10,000+ results

1.26s

  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Sep 13, 2002

    The defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before the beginning of discovery if the plaintiff's allegations do not state a claim of violation of clearly established law. Harlow v. … Further, the defendants have clearly carried their burden of pleading qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brenda Albert v. City of Wheeling

    238 W. Va. 129 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 27, 2016

    Therefore, unless there is a bona fide dispute as to the foundational or historical facts that underlie the immunity determination, the ultimate questions of statutory or qualified immunity are ripe for summary disposition … To decide otherwise would risk further erosion of “well-established common law and statutory immunities which are vital to the proper functioning] of government.”

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Pleasants v. Town of Louisa

    847 F. Supp. 2d 864 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Mar 12, 2012

    I commence my inquiry into Rigs-by’s entitlement to qualified immunity by determining whether Ms. Pleasants claims the violation of a right that was clearly established under the circumstances. … Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 643 , 107 S.Ct. 3034 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523 (1987), an outcome often created by the "clearly established” component of the qualified immunity inquiry, see Lisa R. Eskow & Kevin W.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Grancid Camilo-Robles v. Jose R. Zapata, A/K/A Jose R. Zapata-Rivera

    175 F.3d 41 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Apr 20, 1999

    Because of its focus on tort causation and culpability, the qualified immunity analysis in neglect-of-risk cases seldom, if ever, raises abstract questions of law about whether a right was clearly established. … We concluded that the applicable law, and, hence, the plaintiffs’ asserted right, was clearly established by *46 1993.

    Cited 135 timesPublished
  • Baldwin v. Estherville, Iowa

    218 F. Supp. 3d 987 · District Court, N.D. Iowa · Nov 18, 2016

    In the alternative, the defendants argue that Officers Reineke and Hellickson are entitled to qualified immunity, because it was not *997 clearly established that, when the City incorporated Iowa Code Ch. 321 into the City … . “ ‘Qualified immunity shields government officials from liability and the burdens of litigation in a § 1983 action unless the official’s conduct violates a clearly established constitutional or statutory right of which

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Archuleta v. Wagner

    523 F.3d 1278 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Apr 29, 2008

    Archuleta’s clearly established constitutional rights because Ms. … “[Government officials performing discretionary functions generally are granted a qualified immunity and are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory

    Cited 265 timesPublished
  • Frye v. Hodges

    839 F. Supp. 2d 843 · District Court, W.D. Virginia · Dec 30, 2011

    “Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions from personal-capacity liability for civil damages under § 1983, insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … To overcome a qualified immunity defense, a plaintiff in a § 1983 case must show that the defendant’s action deprived the plaintiff of a protected constitutional right and that the right was so clearly established at the

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Scott Drewry v. William Brenner, Individually, and In His Official Capacity as Chief of Police; and the Town of Greybull

    2025 WY 121 · Wyoming Supreme Court · Nov 6, 2025

    The doctrine of qualified immunity precludes Mr. … We conclude Chief Brenner has established that he acted in good faith for the purposes of qualified immunity. [¶26] Differences of opinion are similarly immaterial when applying the reasonableness element.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Curtis Morton v. City of Little Rock Phillip Wilson, and Ronnie Gatewood, Individually and in Their Official Capacities

    934 F.2d 180 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · May 30, 1991

    , (3) Wilson’s misconduct was negligent rather than intentional, and (4) plaintiff’s claims against Gatewood in his individual capacity were barred by qualified immunity and quasi-judicial immunity. … To avoid summary judgment based on qualified immunity, plaintiff must show that at the time of Gatewood's action or inaction, the specific right at issue was so clearly established that any reasonable law enforcement officer

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Gregory Yancey v. Carroll County, Ky.

    876 F.2d 1238 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 27, 1989

    A court may dismiss a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against government officials on summary judgment if the undisputed facts show that “defendants’ conduct, as a matter of law, did not violate clearly established constitutional … Therefore, the district court was correct in holding that as a matter of law, these defendants’ conduct had not violated “clearly established constitutional rights.”

    Cited 127 timesPublished
  • Ringuette v. City of Fall River

    146 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Jun 5, 1998

    Mass. 1995), but several claims were reserved for trial, and the issue of qualified immunity was not resolved. … violated clearly established law.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • W. Va. Dept. of Transportation, DMV v. David King, Administrator of the Estate of Wilma Ann King

    238 W. Va. 369 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 15, 2016

    ANALYSIS This case involves our law of qualified immunity. … Peyton’s driver’s license, the DMV is not entitled to qualified immunity under the facts of this case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Keating v. University of South Dakota

    980 F. Supp. 2d 1137 · District Court, D. South Dakota · Sep 30, 2013

    Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, state actors are protected from civil liability when “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have … The second step in the qualified immunity inquiry is to determine whether Keating’s free speech right was clearly established at the time his contract was not renewed. See Sexton, 210 F.3d at 910.

    Reversed on other grounds by Christopher Keating v. University of South Dakota, 569 F. App'x 469 (2014)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • (PC) McNeil v. Toor

    District Court, E.D. California · Jan 2, 2024

    Qualified Immunity 28 In the alternative, Defendants assert they are entitled to qualified immunity because there 1 is not clearly established case law that provided Defendants … ‘clearly established’ at the time of defendant's alleged 6 misconduct.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Golden Rule Insurance v. Long

    113 N.C. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 23, 1993

    In order to defeat the qualified immunity, plaintiff had to show that defendant violated some clearly established constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. Harlow v. … This standard determines if further proceedings are barred by qualified immunity by examining the law in existence at the time of the offense to determine if it contained “clearly established . . . rights of which a reasonable

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Doe v. LaDue

    514 F. Supp. 2d 1131 · District Court, D. Minnesota · Sep 4, 2007

    Plaintiffs allege that the OPD’s proactive monitoring approach violated Doe’s clearly established Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure 2 and that defendants are not entitled to qualified … As the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable. search and seizure is a well-established right, even for predatory offender registrants, qualified immunity does not protect the defendant officers. Cf.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Ivonne Padilla v. Peter Mason and Jaeson Jones

    Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · Jul 28, 2005

    Qualified immunity shields an officer if a reasonable officer could have believed the action to be lawful in light of clearly established law and the information the officer possessed. Hunter v. … Because there was no clearly established rule which would prohibit Mason from using the force that he did, he is entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fenwick v. United States of America

    926 F. Supp. 2d 201 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2013

    Fenwick’s clearly established rights. The Court therefore does not find the defendants entitled to qualified immunity at this juncture. 1. … Clearly Established Right With respect to the second prong of the qualified immunity analysis, it was clearly established at the time of this incident that shooting a fleeing suspect who is not presently

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Dull v. WEST MANCHESTER TP. POLICE DEPT.

    604 F. Supp. 2d 739 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2009

    The court may *749 eschew difficult constitutional issues and award qualified immunity to a defendant if it is apparent that the defendant did not violate rights that were clearly established at the time the defendant acted … To determine whether a police officer enjoys qualified immunity, the court must ascertain whether the officer violated "clearly established statutory or constitutional *752 rights of which a reasonable person would have known

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Glenn v. Washington County

    661 F.3d 460 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 27, 2011

    the right was clearly established at the time of the alleged misconduct. … Smith, 394 F.3d at 703 (reversing district court’s grant of qualified immunity).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.