Case law

Owenby v. . Power Co.

194 N.C. 129 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 25, 1927

In Warwick v. Ginning Co., 153 N. … Also in Brown v. Scofields Co., 174 N. C., 4 , Brown, J., *131 speaking for the Court, said: “Tbe place where plaintiff was standing when hurt was not a ‘place’ within the legal signification of that term.

Robinson v. Robinson

56 N.C. App. 737 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1982

Hankins v. Somers, 39 N.C. App. 617 , 251 S.E. 2d 640 , cert. denied, 297 N.C. 300 , 254 S.E. 2d 920 (1979). … Brown v. Brown, 47 N.C. App. 323 , 267 S.E. 2d 345 (1980). The court, therefore, properly concluded that North Carolina’s statute permits jurisdiction over defendant.

John Doe 2 v. Nash County Board of Education; Marquis Johnson, individually and as an employee of Nash County Board of Education

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Feb 5, 2026

The present case is the second victim to sue Johnson and the Board. The first suit came before Judge Dever, who entered an order denying in part the Board’s motion to dismiss. Doe v. Nash Cnty. … Grayson O Co. v. Agadir Int'l LLC, 856 F.3d 307, 316 (4th Cir. 2017) (quoting Brown v. Nucor Corp., 785 F.3d 895, 923 (4th Cir. 2015) (cleaned up)).

State v. Coats

100 N.C. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1990

United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 682 , 87 L. Ed. 2d 481, 494 , 105 S. Ct. 3375, 3383 (1985). By that standard Ms. Brown’s opinion is not material. … Brown’s statement does not meet the requirements of that section. See State v. Sprinkle, 46 N.C. App. 802, 805 , 266 S.E.2d 375, 377 , disc. review denied, 300 N.C. 561 , 270 S.E.2d 115 (1980).

Sexton v. Greensboro Life Insurance

160 N.C. 597 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1912

We have stated above tbe substance of tbe controversy as set out by Brown, J., in tbe opinion in tbat case. … This note is similar to the language construed in Ferebee v. Insurance Co., 68 N. C., 11 .” In 3 Cooley Ins., 2269, and cases cited, and Pitt v.

Crocker v. Moore.

140 N.C. 429 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 1906

Board of Education v. Commissioners, 137 N. C., 310 . 4. … Tate v. Commisioners, 122 N. C., 812 ; Herring v. Dixon, ibid., 420; Satterthwaite v. Commissioners, 76 N. C., 153 ; Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 249 . 5.

Shepard v. Catawba Coll.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 18, 2020

V. … They didn’t replace one or two boards, they are replacing all the boards, which supports our position that it wasn’t just one board or two boards or three boards, the entire stadium

Holland v. . Hartley

171 N.C. 376 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1916

Daniel v. R. R., ante, 23; 29 Cyc., 1626; Lowrie v. Oxendine, 153 N. C., 268 . … Peele v. Powell, 156 N. C., 557 ; Dale v. Lumber Co., 152 N. C., 653 . It would, however, have'been error had the judge stopped with that instruction and said nothing more.

Dunn, Ex Parte

63 N.C. 137 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1869

Cox, v. Brown, 5 Ire. 194. Before such allotment, she has no inter est transmissible to her administrator. Kimball v. Deming, 5 Ire. 418. What amounts to an allotm ent ?

Bissett v. . Bailey

176 N.C. 43 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 11, 1918

The case of Brown v. Adams, 174 N. C., 490 , is not like this case, for there the attempt was to prove a conversation of the deceased for the purpose of fixing liability upon Mr. … Brown v. Adams related to the terms of a contract, and was not remotely connected with the state of Mr. Adams’s mind or his physical condition.

Whitehead v. . Pittman

165 N.C. 89 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1914

But even if he had not, his acceptance of the position of' county superintendent of public instruction eo instanti vacated his position on the board of commissioners. Midgett v. Gray, 159 N. C., 443 ; Barnhill v. … Norfleet v. Staton, supra.

Mims v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 2020

Brown, Crump, Vanore & Tierney, L.L.P., by Andrew A. Vanore, III, for defendants-appellees. HAMPSON, Judge. … Is determined by the person or Board designated by the county or municipal authority responsible for animal control to be potentially dangerous because the dog has engaged in one or more of the

Schloss Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of Charlotte

50 N.C. App. 150 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1980

Sutton v. Duke, 227 N.C. 94 , 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970); Brown v. Brown, 21 N.C. App. 435 , 204 S.E. 2d 534 (1974). … Insurance Co. v. Blythe Brothers, Co., 260 N.C. 69, 78 , 131 S.E. 2d 900, 907 (1963).

Jones v. Commissioners of Person County

107 N.C. 248 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890

See those cited, supra; see also Calaveras County v. Brockway, 30 Cal., 325 ; Gibson v. Board Supervisors, 80 Cal., 359 ; Boren v. Smith, 47 Ill., 482 ; People v. Wiant, 48 Ill., 263 ; Dickey v. Reed, 68 Ill., 262 . … Wood v. Oxford, 97 N. C., 227 ; Brown v. Commissioners 100 N. C., 92 , and cases there cited.

Vaughn v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources

296 N.C. 683 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1979

Hayes v. Elon College, 224 N.C. 11 , 29 S.E. 2d 137 (1944); Harmon v. Contracting Co., 159 N.C. 22 , 74 S.E. 632 (1912). See also, Scott v. Lumber Co., 232 N.C. 162 , 59 S.E. 2d 425 (1950). … See Hayes v. Elon College, supra. The case of Turner v. Board of Education, 250 N.C. 456 , 109 S.E. 2d 211 (1959), cited by defendant as dispositive of this appeal, is factually distinguishable.

Patton v. . Gash

99 N.C. 280 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1888

That was an independent action brought against the defendants on their undertaking as bail for Brown. … Roulhac v. Brown, 87 N. C., 1 . The plaintiff having had execution against the person of Robertson it was his duty to surrender himself, or of his bail to surrender him in discharge of his liability. Sedberry v.

Kitchen v. . Wilson

80 N.C. 191 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1879

And in McLean v. … But we do not .admit the proposition itself to be well founded in law, and it isin .direct opposition to the doctrine ■declared in Brown’s Heirs v. Potter’s Heirs, Bush, 461.

Clement v. Ireland.

138 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1905

Brown, J. This cause was before this court at August Term, 1901, and is reported in 129 N. C., at page 220. … See also Fertilizer Co. v. Grubbs, 114 N. C., 410; Edwards v .Morpin, 7 Mackey (D. C.) 39. In Roulhac v. Brown, 87 N.

Am. Transp. Grp. Ins. Risk Retention Grp. v. Mvt Ins. Servs., Inc.

2021 NCBC 26 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 19, 2021

Risk Retention Grp. v. MVT Ins. Servs., Inc., 2021 NCBC 26. … As part of ATGI’s compliance efforts, on March 13, 2020 and April 3, 2020, ATGI’s Board adopted resolutions which increased the number of board members from three to five; appointed three new independent board members—Ron

Greene v. . Stadiem

198 N.C. 445 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1930

Combs v. Paul 191 N. C., 789 , 133 S. E., 93 ; Brooks v. Griffin, 177 N. C., 7 , 97 S. E., 730 ; Wool v. Fleetwood, 136 N. C., 460 , 48 S. E., 785 ; Latimer v. Waddell, 119 N. C., 370 , 26 S. E., 122 . … Ency. of Law, 2 ed., 1158; Hill v. Reno, 112 Ill., 154 ; Ingraham v. Mariner, 194 ibid., 269; Brown v. Brown, 43 Ind., 474 ; Hunt v. Wright, 47 N.