Case law

Bryson v. MacY

611 F. Supp. 2d 1234 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 30, 2009

Brown v. Gray, 227 F.3d 1278 , 1290 & n. 7 (10th Cir.2000); Houston v. Reich, 932 F.2d 883 (10th Cir. 1991). G. … In Brown v. Hartshorne Pub. Sch. Dist. # I, 926 F.2d 959, 962 (10th Cir.1991), the Tenth Circuit concluded that Oklahoma’s savings provision applies to a § 1983 claim. 10 .

Smith v. Oklahoma City Bldg. & Loan Ass'n

179 Okla. 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 18, 1936

Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. … Fornataro v. Atl. Coast, etc., Ass’n, 163 A. 240 . 10 N. J. Misc. 1248, and Stone v. Schiller B. & L. Ass’n, 302 Pa. 544 , 153 A. 758 . In the last-named case the early case of U. S. B. & L. Ass’n v.

Terry v. Edgin

561 P.2d 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 22, 1977

E. g., City of Wagoner v. Black, 186 Okl. 207 , 97 P.2d 21 (1959); City of Hugo v. Nance, 39 Okl. 640 , 135 P. 346 (1913); City of Tulsa v. Macura, 186 Okl. 674 , 100 P.2d 269 (1940). … E. g., City of Hugo v. Nance, supra; City of Wagoner v. Black, supra; City of Norman v. Sallee, supra.

Adwon v. Ketcham

169 Okla. 428 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

Wilkinson v. Stone, 82 Okla. 296 , 200 P. 196 ; Miller et al. v. Gregory et al., 132 Okla. 48 , 269 P. 303 ; Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Whitchurch, 139 Okla. 1 , 281 P. 234 . … Chestnut v. Worley et al., 164 Okla. 153 , 23 P. (2d) 196 ; Melton v. Whitney et al., 164 Okla. 220 , 23 P. (2d) 660 ; McKay v. Kelly, 130 Okla. 62 , 264 P. 814 ; Cull v. Cavanaugh, 95 Okla. 157 , 218 P. 299 ; Thomas v.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1994

The key case for Oklahoma regarding released-time programs is Lanner v. Wimmer, 662 F.2d 1349 (10th Cir.1981). … Perry v. School Dist. No. 81, 344 P.2d 1036 (Wash. 1948).

In Re Hays

189 Okla. 386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1941

The record in this case sustains the findings made by the board. … J., CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, GIBSON, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. Nath

63 O.B.A.J. 2649 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1992

Sharum, 21 Okl. 863 , 97 P. 555, 556 (1908); Board of Com’rs of D County v. Wright, 8 Okl. 190 , 57 P. 203 (syllabus ¶3) (1899). 31 . … See, e.g., Sinclair Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Board, 173 Okl. 375 , 49 P.2d 114, 119 (1935); Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co., 157 Okl. 246 , 11 P.2d 500, 504 (1932). But see Choctaw County Excise Board v.

Opinion No. 68-225 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 24, 1968

Title 70 O.S. 7 -6 [70-7-6] (1961) was construed by our Supreme Court in the case of High Hill Rural Development Club v. Great American Ins. … In the case of Smith v.

IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 1.21 OF OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT RULES

2021 OK 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 2021

Letteer v. Conservancy District No. 30, 1963 OK 218 , 385 P.2d 796, 802 . (c) County Excise Board Budget Setting Appeals. … Letteer v. Conservancy District No. 30, 1963 OK 218 , 385 P.2d 796, 802 . (c) County Excise Board Budget Setting Appeals.

Opinion No. 74-265 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 28, 1975

PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION Where a professional organization is designated under 70 O.S. 509 .2 [ 70-509.2 ] (1971), during a school year by a majority of professional educators of a school district for negotiations with the Board … This question, has, however, been recently decided in Liberal-NEA v. Board of Education, 505 P.2d 651 (Kan.S.Ct. 1973).

Opinion No. 79-224 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 3, 1979

In addition, the chairman and members of said Pardon and Parole Board shall receive their actual and necessary expenses while attending and going to and from meetings of the Board and in performing their official duties, … The Court in Reubin v.

Opinion No. 79-138 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1979

The State Employees Group Health and Life Insurance Board (hereafter the "Board") is authorized to contract for a claims administrator to process claims arising under the several group insurance plans. … See Wells v. Childers (Okl. 1945) 165 P.2d 371 , 376 . An additional consideration is whether a contract may be let which tends to bind the State of Oklahoma to an agreement to expend future fiscal year funds.

Opinion No. 71-219 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1971

appointed by the Board of Governors. … Therefore, a Postmaster and/or rural mail carrier may not serve as a member of a school board concurrently, because of the appointment and trust nature of his federal position pursuant to United States v.

Opinion No. 70-283 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 1, 1970

In Farley v. Board of Education of City of Perry, 62 Okl. 181 , 162 P. 797 (1917), our Supreme Court held that a superintendent of schools was not a public officer. It said: ". . . . … The Court then quoted approvingly from Olmstead v. Mayor, 42 N.Y.

Anderson v. Walker

333 P.2d 570 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1958

Co. v. Excise Board of Garfield County, 167 Ok. 414, 30 P.2d 171 ; Herndon v. Anderson, 165 Okl. 104 , 25 P.2d 326 ; Morrison v. Fry, 208 Okl. 239 , 255 P.2d 270 ; Lowden v. … Board of Commissioners of Harmon County, 161 Okl. 245 , 17 P.2d 690 ; Excise Board of Kay County v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 155 Okl. 34 , 7 P.2d 902 .

Campbell v. White

64 O.B.A.J. 2066 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1993

Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 (syllabus 8) (1962). Voting equality among legislators is a constitutional command and cannot be intruded upon. . … York v. Turpen, Okl., 681 P.2d 763, 767 (1984); Bailey v. State Board of Public Affairs, 194 Okl. 495 , 153 P.2d 235, 239 (1945). . I.N.S. v.

TA’VION MURPHY v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE OKLAHOMA COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE AUTHORITY, et al.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 20, 2026

CIV-25-1556-SLP ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE ) OKLAHOMA COUNTY CRIMINAL ) … See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc.

Emp. SEC. v. Bd. of Rev. for Emp. SEC.

914 P.2d 1083 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1996

914 P.2d 1083 (1996) OKLAHOMA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW FOR the OKLAHOMA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION, Mildred L. Griffin, and United States Department of Transportation ex rel. … The instant case is more analogous to Department of the Navy v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 168 Pa. Commw. 356 , 650 A.2d 1138 (1994).

H & EN, Inc. v. Oklahoma Department of Labor

136 P.3d 1070 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · May 5, 2006

Edmondson v. Siegfried Ins. Agcy., Inc., 1978 OK 45 , 577 P.2d 72 . … . ¶ 13 The Edmondson Court, at 73, held: The Oklahoma Employment Security Commission and the Board of Review of that Commission, and any other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Review, are necessary parties and

Weatherford Milling Co. v. Duncan, County Treasurer

42 Okla. 242 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1914

Attention has been called to the case of Williams, County Clerk, v. … Eor cases illustrating the application of these principles, see Wheeler v. Board of Commissioners, 88 Me. 174 , 33 Atl. 983 ; Hyland v. Brazil Block Coal Co.; 128 Ind. 335 , 26 N. E. 672 ; Lewiston Water & Power Co. v.