Case law

Walker v. . Walker

60 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1864

That such evidence is *Page 159 admissible for such purposes was directly decided by this Court, in Brown v. Brown , 49 N.C. 123 . … Calvert , 83 N.C. 371 ; Cheatham v. Rowland , 105 N.C. 222 ; Patton v. Garrett , 116 N.C. 858 ; Millinery Co. v. Ins. Co. , 160 N.C. 141 . *Page 160

State v. Cummings

301 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 4, 1980

State v. Knight, 247 N.C. 754 , 102 S.E. 2d 259 (1958); State v. Minton, supra. Compare State v. … Compare State v.

State v. Davis

92 N.C. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 1989

State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 569 , 313 S.E. 2d 585, 589 (1984). … State v.

Stanley v. Retirement & Health Benefits Division

66 N.C. App. 122 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 17, 1984

Cannon v. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue, 205 N.C. 420 , 171 S.E. 624 (1933); Teer Co. v. Highway Comm., 4 N.C. App. 126 , 166 S.E. 2d 705 (1969). … Significantly, the Board of Governors has been considered an agency of the State for purposes of sovereign immunity, although it is a “corporation.” See MacDonald v.

Blades v. Dewey.

136 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1904

The real point decided is that the language of the general statute will control the election by the board “for the ensuing year.” The case of Westervelt v. Mohsenstecher, 76 Fed. Rep., 118, 34 L. R. … Bank v. Odd Fellows, 48 Penn., 446; Thomas v. Summey, 46 N. C., 554: Welch v. Seymour, 28 Conn., 387 ; 5 Cyc., 773-4; Munford v. Rice, 6 Mun., 87. We do not think that the case of Bank v. Seidensticker, 92 N. W.

Lovette v. Lloyd

236 N.C. 663 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 1953

Brown v. R. R., supra. … Essick v. Lexington, 232 N.C. 200 , 60 S.E. 2d 106 ; Brown v. R. R., 202 N.C. 256 , 162 S.E. 613 .

Parker v. . Debnam

195 N.C. 56 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1928

Howard v. Board of Education, 189 N. C., p. 675; Power Co. v. Moses, 191 N. C., p. 744; Board of Comrs. v. State Highway Commission, ante, 26. … It was done by the board of education in good faith, and in the honest exercise of its discretion. Gaddis v. Cherokee County Road Com., post, 107. There was evidence to sustain the findings.

Craver v. Nakagama

94 N.C. App. 158 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1989

In re Brown, 242 N.Y. 1 , 150 N.E. 581 (1926). Generally, a partnership’s name is an inseparable part of the business’ goodwill which may be sold along with the physical assets of the business. O’Hara v. … In re Brown at 9 , 150 N.E. at 583 .

Borden v. City of Goldsboro

173 N.C. 661 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1917

The charter of defendant plainly creates the' office of sinking fund commissioner, and authorizes tbe board of aldermen to fill it. ' The term is fixed at six years and tbe compensation is to be determined by tbe board. … Caho v. R. R., 147 N. C., 20 ; Chiles v. Mfg. Co., 167 N. C., 574 . The judgment of the Superior Court upon plaintiff’s appeal is Affirmed. The costs of plaintiff’s appeal will be paid by plaintiff. DEFENDANT’S APPEAL.

Rainey v. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

363 N.C. 130 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 2009

Gabbidon Builders

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2024

On 18 July 2022, the Board filed a motion to consolidate the matters, -3-  GABBIDON BUILDERS, LLC V. N.C. LICENSING BD. FOR GEN. … Reserve Bank v.

Lewis v. . Murray

177 N.C. 17 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 3, 1919

Bateman v. Hopkins, supra; Mfg. Co. v. Hendricks, supra; Thornburg v. Masten, 88 N. C., 293 ; Farmer v. Batts, 83 N. C., 387 ; Simmons v. Spruill, 56 N. C., 9 ; 29 A. & E. Enc. (2d Ed.), 866. … In Burns v. Starr, 165 N.

Shimer v. Traub

244 N.C. 466 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1956

Sprinkle v. Reidsville, 235 N.C. 140 , 69 S.E. 2d 179 ; Cedar Works v. Lumber Co., 161 N.C. 603 , 77 S.E. 770 ; Fishel v. Browning, 145 N.C. 71 , 58 S.E. 759 ; Wiggins v. … Fishel v. Browning, supra.

State v. Crawford

29 N.C. App. 117 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1976

State v. Brown, 263 N.C. 786 , 140 S.E. 2d 413 (1965). … State v. Eppley, 282 N.C. 249, 259 , 192 S.E. 2d 441, 448 (1972) ; State v. Miller, 271 N.C. 646 , 157 S.E. 2d 335 (1967) ; State v. Brown, supra.

Bermuda Run Country Club, Inc. v. Atwell

121 N.C. App. 137 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1995

Our Supreme Court in Runyon v. Paley, 331 N.C. 293 , 416 S.E.2d 177 (1992), appeal after remand, William v. Paley, 114 N.C. … In an earlier case, Board of Governors of Bermuda Run Country Club v.

Ballinger v. . Rader

151 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1909

The statute (Revisal, sec. 4596) provides: “Any three of the board of directors of any hospital . . . shall be a board to discharge or remove from' their hospital any person admitted as insane, when such person has become … C., 278 ), or the lumber on tbe right of way of the railroad at Elk Park when the hotel was destroyed by fire (Bowers v. Railroad, 144 N.

In re: Pop Capitol Towers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2022

Bryant v. Wake Forest Univ. Baptist Med. Ctr., 2022-NCCOA-89, ¶33 (citing Carolina Power & Light Co. v. … Utilities Comm’n v.

Foster v. Town of Tryon

169 N.C. 182 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 12, 1915

C., 110 , which has been approved in Brown v. Durham, 141 N. C., 252 ; Revis v. Raleigh, 150 N. C., 353 ; Johnson v. Raleigh, 156 N. C., 271 ; Bailey v. Winston, 157 N. C., 259 , and in other eases. … In Brewster v. Elizabeth City, 142 N.

Holton v. . Mocksville

189 N.C. 144 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1925

Tarboro v. Forbes , 185 N.C. 59 . … Belo v. Comrs. , 76 N.C. 489 ; Wharton v. Greensboro , 149 N.C. 62 ; Anderson v. Wilkins , 142 N.C. 154 ; Edwards v. Comrs. , 183 N.C. 58 ; Board of Education v. Board of Comrs., ibid. , 300.

Culbreth v. Ingram

389 F. Supp. 2d 668 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Sep 29, 2005

Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982), but it has not addressed the issue of exhaustion of intraservice remedies in the § 1983 context. … See, Woodard, v. Marsh, 658 F.2d 989, 992 (5th Cir.1981); see also Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 , 106 S.Ct. 1310 , 89 L.Ed.2d 478 (1986) (reviewing First Amendment challenge to Air Force regulation); Brown v.