Case law

District of Columbia Hospital Ass'n v. District of Columbia

73 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1999

Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94 (1980). Res Judicata does not, however, bar a party or parties from relitigating a previously asserted claim dismissed on justiciability grounds. Cutler v. … Brown’s. Ms.

District of Columbia v. Casino Associates, Ltd.

684 A.2d 322 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1996

See also Lake Worth Towers, Inc. v. … See also The Washington Post Co. v.

Byers v. United States Tax Court

211 F. Supp. 3d 240 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2016

That entity, known as the Board of Tax Appeals (the “Board”), was created as “an independent agency in the executive branch of the Government.” Revenue Act *242 of 1924, Pub. L. … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (reversing the district court because it failed to consider allegations found in a pro se plaintiffs opposition to a motion to dismiss). IV.

In Re Miller

883 A.2d 105 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 2005

See Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Miller, Misc. Docket AG No. 13 (September Term 2004). … Bar Counsel filed a certified copy of the *106 Maryland reprimand order with this court, and we referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) to either recommend whether identical, greater or lesser

Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.

445 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 1978

British Airways Board v. Taylor, 1 All E.R. 65 (House of Lords 1976). … And, the following year in Knippen v.

Baptist Healthcare of Oklahoma, LLC v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2025

C., Inc. v. … Ctr. v.

In Re Huber

708 A.2d 259 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1998

See, e.g., Bingham v. Goldberg, Marchesano, Kohlman, Inc., 637 A.2d 81 , 95 n. 34 (D.C.1994). … See In re Gorfkle, 444 A.2d 934, 939-40 (D.C.1982); see also Zapata v. Zapata, 499 A.2d 905, 908 (D.C. 1985). 6 .

Old Kent Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin

172 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 1959

The Board refused to approve the operation by plaintiff of the additional branches on the ground that this would probably have an adverse effect upon competition in the Grand Rapids area. … It is this; act of increasing the number of branches that requires prior approval by the Board.

Fuller v. Alexander

440 F. Supp. 380 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 1977

See Colm v. Kissinger, 406 F.Supp. 1250 (D.D.C.1975) and Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … Knehans v.

Local Union No. 749, International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers v. National Labor Relations Board

466 F.2d 343 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1972

B. v. … Co. v. [National] Labor [Relations] Board, 186 F.2d 1008 (C.A. 7th Cir.). . . . See also N. L. R. B. v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co., 388 U.S. 175, 197, n. 37 , 87 S. Ct. 2001 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1123 (1967); Amalgamated Ass’n etc.

Miller v. District of Columbia

587 A.2d 213 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1991

In Golden State Transit Corp. v. … This is not to say that the determination of issues by the Board may not have some effect under doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. See University of Tennessee v.

Robert C. Buffkin v. Alum-Co National, Inc.

331 F.2d 96 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1963

Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 , 83 S.Ct. 227 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962); Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc., 371 U.S. 215 , 83 S.Ct. 283 , 9 L.Ed.2d 261 (1962); cf. Gerringer v. … See People of State of New York v. O’Neill, 359 U.S. 1 , 79 S.Ct. 564 , 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959). 4 . Engle v.

Caudle v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

676 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 1987

Those charges were ultimately rejected by the ALPA Appeals Board on August 9, 1984. II. … See Price v. International Union, 795 F.2d 1128 , 1135-36 (2d Cir.1986) (affirming grant of summary judgment in duty of fair representation case); Brown v. Trans World Airlines, 746 F.2d 1354, 1358-60 (8th Cir.1984).

Lewis v. Rent-A-Crane, Inc.

315 A.2d 171 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1974

Plaintiff cites the cases of Greet v. Otis Elevator Co., D.C.App., 187 A.2d 896 (1963), and Washington Sheraton Corp. v. … See Alley v. Texas Electric Service Co., 134 S.W.2d 762, 769 (Tex.Ct.Civ.App.1939), and Longoria v. Violet Gin Co., 309 S.W.2d 484 (Tex.Ct.Civ.App.1958).

United States v. Hoover-Hankerson

406 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2005

Brown would see Hoover with Robinson when Robinson handed Brown vouchers and when Brown turned over some of the proceeds. Brown heard Hoover referred to as “Ben.” … and Marvin Brown, and that Taylor, Antonio Brown and Marvin Brown each received their vouchers from either Robinson or Hoover.

Money v. Cullinane

392 A.2d 998 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1978

V 1975). … [Wells v. District of Columbia Board of Education, D.C.App., 386 A.2d 703, 706 (1978).]

In Re Pels

653 A.2d 388 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 30, 1995

Id. at 702 (quoting Clark v. State Bar, 39 Cal.2d 161, 168 , 246 P.2d 1, 5 (1952)). … See Separate Opinion of Board member Don-nenfeld, at 1. 3 .

Noel v. Olds

138 F.2d 581 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 11, 1943

He tendered to the testator the services of a member of the Duke Endowment Board to prepare a new will. 1 He furnished to the testator the services of the architect of Duke University, who drew plans for the proposed gallery … District Unemployment Compensation Board, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 282 . 284, 288, 131 F.2d 337, 339, 343 , cert. denied, 317 U.S. 693 , 63 S.Ct. 324 , 87 L.Ed. —; Bauer v. Myers, 8 Cir., 244 F. 902 . 909; John v.

Angarano v. United States

329 A.2d 453 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1974

Action, 217 So.2d 323 (Fla.1969) (Should the Board of Governors on behalf of the Bar advocate electoral support for revised Constitution); Sams v. Olah, supra (Whether the State Bar Act was constitutional); Button v. … Accord, United States v. Brown, 155 U.S. App.D.C. 177, 179, 476 F.2d 933, 935 (1973); United States v. Thompson, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 347, 348 , 475 F.2d 931, 932 (1973). See also Marshall v.

In Re Coates

855 A.2d 1116 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2004

Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Coates, 376 Md. 699 , 831 A.2d 1042 (2003). This suspension was the result of respondent’s misconduct in two cases. … Respondent did not participate in the proceedings before the Board and has not filed any exceptions in this court to the Board’s recommendation. *1117 In light of the heightened deference we give the Board’s recommendation