Case law

Dunbar Engineering Corp. v. Rhinosystems, Inc.

232 P.3d 931 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 2010

Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 1977 OK 17 , ¶ 3, 561 P.2d 499, 502 . ¶ 10 A motion to reconsider is not recognized in Oklahoma procedural statutes. McMillian v. … Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 489 U.S. 468, 475 , 109 S.Ct. 1248, 1254 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989)).

Opinion No. 77-274 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1978

We recognize the case of City of Altus, Oklahoma v. Carr, 255 F. Supp. 828 (W.D. Tex. 1966), as dealing with a similar issue, but find it not dispositive of this question. … Inc. v. Cottrell (Miss. 1976), 96 S.Ct. 923 , 424 U.S. 366 , 47 L.Ed.2d 55 .

Pitchford v. Blanchard

503 P.2d 1270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1972

In Davis v. Foley, 60 Okl. 87 , 159 P. 646 , we held that an action may be maintained upon a judgment, although the judgment creditor has the right to issue execution thereon. … In discussing the Davis case in Board of Education of City of Drumright v.

Opinion No. 72-248 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 1972

In the absence of appeal as provided by this act, the decision of the Board shall be final. … In re Redwine Estate, Okl., 445 P.2d 275 , and McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 .

T.V. ex rel. Villnave v. Columbia National Insurance Co.

313 P.3d 1022 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 28, 2013

Cue v. Casualty Corporation of America, 1975 OK CIV APP 33 , ¶22, 537 P.2d 349, 352 . In Zahn v. General Ins. … See General Finance Corporation v. Jackson, 1956 OK 129, ¶¶7-10 , 296 P.2d 141, 143-144 , and Barringer v.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 29, 1991

IN STILLWATER SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION V. … ADDITIONALLY, SINCE STILLWATER, THE SUPREME COURT, IN 1981, REAFFIRMED ITS RATIONALE IN STILLWATER IN BALENSEIFEN V. BD. OF GOVERNORS OF REGISTERED DENTIST, (CASE NO. 52,078).

Meyers v. Keeler

414 F. Supp. 935 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 3, 1976

He cites several cases to include deHass v. … In Brody v.

Pitman v. City of El Reno

2 Okla. 414 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1894

the defendant in error had due notice; that said defect consisted of an off-set in said walk, of about eight (8) inches, and between the high and low walk, there was a space of six or eight inches, not covered by plank or board … Brown, 27 Kan., 74 , an action against the city of Osage City to recover damages resulting from a defective sidewalk, the plaintiff recovered $550, and the city of Osage City took the case to the *434 supreme court, and alleged

House v. Musick

185 Okla. 264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1939

Ann. sec. 103), to remove school board members for causes enumerated in the statute. See School District No. 20 v. Walden, 146 Okla. 19 , 293 P. 199 ; Akin v. … In the case of School District No. 20 v.

Amoco Pipeline Co. v. Montgomery

487 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1980

See, White v. B. K. Trucking Co., Inc., 405 F.Supp. 1068, 1069-1070 (W.D.Okl. 1975); Sunray DX Oil Company v. Brown, 477 P.2d 67, 70 (Okl.1970); Wootan v. Shaw, 205 Okl. 283 , 237 P.2d 442, 444 (1951). … See, Danculovich v. Brown, supra, 593 P.2d at 194 n.10; Woods, supra, at 14.

Fitzsimmons v. Rauch

197 Okla. 426 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1946

As we pointed out in Cowley-Lanter Lumber Co. v. … Defendants rely upon Blakeney v. Francis, 105 Okla. 11 , 231 P. 464 , and English v. Rogers Lumber Co., 68 Okla. 238 , 173 P. 1046 .

Higgins v. State

231 P.3d 757 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 2010

State v. McMahon, 1998 OK CIV APP 103, ¶ 10 , 959 P.2d 607, 608 ; Buechler v. State, 2008 OK CIV APP 1, ¶ 13 , 175 P.3d 966, 971 . … of Oklahoma County, a petition for review of such decision, against the Board of Review.

In Re Initiative Petition No. 142, State Question No. 205

183 Okla. 343 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1938

BATLESS, V. C. J. This involves an appeal from a finding of the Secretary of State that Initiative Petition No. 142 was insufficient. … This discussion of this subject in State v. Olcott, 62 Ore. 277 , 125 P. 303 , is wholesome, and applies here.

Eureka Reserve Life Insurance v. Glazner

115 Okla. 180 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1925

In Fullenwider v. Royal League, 180 Ill. 621 , 54 N. … In Steen v. Modern Woodman of America, 17 A. L. R. 406, citing Fullenwider v. Royal League, supra, the identical language was used. In Hobbs v. Association (Iowa) 47 N.

Dawkins v. Billingsley

69 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1918

Co. v. … W. 867 ; Belknap v. Ball, 83 Mich. 583 , 47 N. W. 674 , 11 L. R. A. 72, 21 Am. St. Rep. 622 ; Wood v. Boyle, 177 Pa. 620 , 35 Atl. 853 , 55 Am. St. Rep. 747 ; Candrian v. Miller, 98 Wis. 164 , 73 N. W. 1004 .

BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.

2019 OK 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2019

Board of Governors, etc. , 1996 OK 41 , 913 P.2d at 1345 . 109 Johnson v. … Board of County Commissioners Discussed at Length 1901 OK 28 , 65 P. 940 , 11 Okla. 56 , BOYD v. BRYAN Discussed 2000 OK 68 , 12 P.3d 452 , 71 OBJ 2366, RIVAS v.

Zachary v. City of Wagoner

146 Okla. 268 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1930

In the case of City of Sapulpa v. … City of Spokane (Wash.) 41 Pac. 888 ; Faulkner v. City of Seattle (Wash.) 53 Pac. 365 ; Joliet v. Alexander (Ill.) 62 N. E. 861 ; East Moline v. Pope (Ill.) 79 N.

In Re State Funding Bonds of 1935, Series B

173 Okla. 626 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1935

OSBORN, V. C. J. … This is an original proceeding brought in the Supreme Court through the State Board of Equalization pursuant to the provisions of article 1, chapter 27, Oklahoma Session Laws 1935, the same being House Bill No. 217, as enacted

Norman v. Norman

86 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1922

See Spradling v. Spradling, 74 Oklahoma, 181 Pac. 148 . It is also within the inherent power of this court to enforce its orders, and in doing this it may dismiss the appeal. In Spradling v. … This rule is supported in: Hall v. Hall, 77 Miss. 741 , 27 South. 636 ; Tuttle v. Tuttle, 21 N. D. 503 , 13 N. W. 460 ; Brown v. Brown, 22 Wyo. 316 , 140 Pac. 829 .

Hensley v. Conard

99 Okla. 173 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 13, 1924

Comanche Ice & Fuel Co. v. Binder & Hillery, 70 Okla. 28 172 Pac. 629 ; Uncle Sam Oil Co. v. Richards, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 749 ; Deming Inv. Co. v. Shannon, 62 Okla. 277 , 162 Pac. 471 ; Cressler v. … Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 Pac. 417 ; Johnson v. Gillette, 66 Okla. 308 , 168 Pac. 1031 ; Brown v. Calvert, 57 Okla. 364 , 157 Pac. 284 .