Case law

Fisher v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

151 F. Supp. 3d 159 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2016

PBGC v. R.A. Gray & Co., 467 U.S. 717, 720 (1984) (quoting Nachman Corp. v. PBGC, 446 U.S. 359, 361–62 (1980)). … Gonzales, 546 U.S. at 256 (quoting Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944)). And under Auer v.

United States v. Hoover-Hankerson

406 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2005

Brown would see Hoover with Robinson when Robinson handed Brown vouchers and when Brown turned over some of the proceeds. Brown heard Hoover referred to as “Ben.” … and Marvin Brown, and that Taylor, Antonio Brown and Marvin Brown each received their vouchers from either Robinson or Hoover.

In Re Edwards

990 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2010

See In re Artis, 883 A.2d 85, 97 (D.C.2005) (“We have held consistently that an attorney who fails to present an issue to the Board waives it and cannot present it for the first time to this court.”); Stockard v. … V.

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ingredion Inc.

930 F.3d 509 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 2019

The court’s assessment of the Board’s decision occurs in light of Congress’s broad delegation to the Board to carry out the Act, see, e.g., NLRB v. Curtin Matheson Sci., Inc., 494 U.S. 775, 786 (1990); Allied Mech. … The Board’s broad discretion to fashion remedies for violations of the Act, see, e.g., Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v.

United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate Boards

84 F. Supp. 802 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 1949

Ever since the decisions of the Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 U.S. 1 , 31 S.Ct. 502 , 55 L.Ed. 619 , 34 L.R.A.,N.S., 834, Ann.Cas.1912D, 734, and United States v. … United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 , 60 S.Ct. 811 , 84 L.Ed. 1129 , and United States v. Trenton Potteries Co., 273 U.S. 392 , 47 S.Ct. 377 , 71 L.Ed. 700 , 50 A.L.R. 989 .

Food Store Employees Union, Local No. 347, Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Heck's Incorporated, Food Store Employees, Union, Local 347, Etc., Intervenor

433 F.2d 541 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 1970

(BNA) 2109 , 139 U.S.App.D.C. 383 FOOD STORE EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. 347, AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS AND BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … -C.I.O. v. N.L.R.B. (Allied Chemical Corp.), 124 U.S.App.D.C. 113, 116 , 362 F.2d 943, 946 (1966) 3 The Board's opinion in this case made findings which meet the requirements subsequently set forth in N.L.R.B. v.

Jones v. United States

391 A.2d 1188 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1978

When the man on the passenger side got out, the officer saw a greenish weed on the right front seat in a brown transparent wrapper, and numerous small brown envelopes on the rear seat. … In Terry v.

In Re Hewett

11 A.3d 279 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2011

Williams v. United *289 States, 441 A.2d 255, 260 (D.C.1982). … The Board found that "it was not uncommon for conservators to be late” in filing their annual accounts. 3 . The Board’s majority report, authored by Irvin B. Nathan, was joined by five other Board members.

Robert C. Buffkin v. Alum-Co National, Inc.

331 F.2d 96 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1963

Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 , 83 S.Ct. 227 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962); Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc., 371 U.S. 215 , 83 S.Ct. 283 , 9 L.Ed.2d 261 (1962); cf. Gerringer v. … See People of State of New York v. O’Neill, 359 U.S. 1 , 79 S.Ct. 564 , 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959). 4 . Engle v.

Roberts v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'n

88 A.2d 324 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1952

Corbin, Contracts, § 9. .Bovello v. Falvey Granite Co., Inc., D.C.Mun.App., 71 A.2d 536 . See also Zlotnick v. Crisp, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 339, 340 , 185 F.2d 502, 503 , footnote 2. . … In re Irwin, 162 Or. 221 , 91 P.2d 518 ; Gabrielson v. Gorin, 92 Wash. 408 , 159 P. 387 ; Baldie v. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass’n, 97 Cal.App.2d 70 , 217 P.2d 111 .

Allied Aviation Service Comp. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 2017

Before: BROWN, SRINIVASAN and PILLARD, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge PILLARD. … That ratification remedied the Appointments Clause defect in the 2012 Board panel’s order. Cf. ManorCare of Kingston PA, LLC v. NLRB, 823 F.3d 81, 90 (D.C. Cir. 2016); Doolin Sec. Sav. Bank v.

In Re Bernstein

707 A.2d 371 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1998

STEADMAN, Associate Judge: The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) found that respondent Kenneth H. … Committee on Legal Ethics v. Hazlett, 179 W.Va. 303 , 367 S.E.2d 772 (1988) (under West Virginia version of Rule 1.16(d), lawyer cannot condition the return of a client's file on the execution of a general release). 8 .

Circus Circus Casinos, Inc. v. NLRB

961 F.3d 469 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 2020

for assuring that the Board keeps within reasonable grounds,” Universal Camera Corp. v. … In Wright Line, the Board adopted the Supreme Court’s burden-shifting framework from Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v.

Payne v. District of Columbia

773 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2011

Brown v. … Brown v.

In re Ahaghotu

75 A.3d 251 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 2013

Ahaghotu’s arguments and adopt the Board’s recommendation. A. … See M.A.F. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310 (D.C.1971). Citing a continuing current of discontent with that rule, 11 Mr.

Hessey v. Burden

584 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 1990

In District of Columbia v. … In District of Columbia v.

Furtado v. Furtado

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 8, 2025

See, e.g., Brown v. WMATA, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016) (dismissing a complaint sua sponte for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)); see also Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–69 (D.C. … Brown, 164 F. Supp. 3d at 35. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

United States v. Orlando Caicedo-Llanos

960 F.2d 158 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 1992

See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978); Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 230 , 93 S.Ct. 1565, 1570 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Simmons v. … Cheung Tin Wong v.

In Re Hopkins

677 A.2d 55 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 31, 1996

Hopkins v. Akins, 637 A.2d 424 (D.C.1993). … See Godette v. Estate of Cox, 592 A.2d 1028, 1033 (D.C.1991); Richardson v. Green, 528 A.2d 429, 430-31 (D.C.1987). 17 .

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Local 2, Office and Professional Employees Int'l Union, Afl-Cio

965 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2013

See Dole Food Co. v. … Co. v. Pub. Serv.