Case law

Turner v. Pitts

162 Okla. 246 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1933

The decisions in Albrecht v. Jones, 130 Okla. 277 , 267 P. 270 ; Okla. Nat. Gas Corp. v. Blake, County Treas., 133 Okla. 13 , 270 P. 843 ; Grubbs v. Smiley, supra; Coggeshell & Co. v. … In Coggeshell & Co. v.

Estus v. State Ex Rel. Dinwiddie

83 Okla. 181 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1921

As was said by the court in the case, of Board of County Commissioners of Custer Co. v. … Roeder, 22 Wash. 570 , 61 Pac. 767 : Schultz v. Ritterbusch, Co. Treas., et al.. 38 Okla. 478 , 134 Pac. 961 .” Board of County Commissioners v. Close Bros., 82 Okla. 174 . 198 Pac. 845 .

Dunbar Engineering Corp. v. Rhinosystems, Inc.

232 P.3d 931 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 6, 2010

Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 1977 OK 17 , ¶ 3, 561 P.2d 499, 502 . ¶ 10 A motion to reconsider is not recognized in Oklahoma procedural statutes. McMillian v. … Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 489 U.S. 468, 475 , 109 S.Ct. 1248, 1254 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989)).

Hilligoss v. Webb

60 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1916

In Graham v. … Conness v. Brown, 44 Okla. 137 , 143 Pac. 852 . For the reasons above suggested, the appeal is dismissed. By the Court: It is so ordered.

Meyers v. Keeler

414 F. Supp. 935 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 3, 1976

He cites several cases to include deHass v. … In Brody v.

Layne-Western Co. v. City of Depew

177 Okla. 338 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1936

This court has twice recently stated that it will not extend the mandatory rule of the Smartt Case (Smartt v. Board of Com’rs, 67 Okla. 141 , 169 P. 1101 ). See Faught v. … The question of lack of mandatory duty was also passed upon in the cases of Board of Commissioners v. Alexander, 171 Okla. 288 , 42 P. (2d) 884 , and Anadarko Funeral Home v.

Pitman v. City of El Reno

2 Okla. 414 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1894

the defendant in error had due notice; that said defect consisted of an off-set in said walk, of about eight (8) inches, and between the high and low walk, there was a space of six or eight inches, not covered by plank or board … Brown, 27 Kan., 74 , an action against the city of Osage City to recover damages resulting from a defective sidewalk, the plaintiff recovered $550, and the city of Osage City took the case to the *434 supreme court, and alleged

Opinion No. 76-154 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1976

may be paid by a board of education at school district expense. … to carry out and fulfill all powers herein grant Syllabus 2 by the Court in City of Wilburton v.

House v. Musick

185 Okla. 264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1939

Ann. sec. 103), to remove school board members for causes enumerated in the statute. See School District No. 20 v. Walden, 146 Okla. 19 , 293 P. 199 ; Akin v. … In the case of School District No. 20 v.

Amoco Pipeline Co. v. Montgomery

487 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1980

See, White v. B. K. Trucking Co., Inc., 405 F.Supp. 1068, 1069-1070 (W.D.Okl. 1975); Sunray DX Oil Company v. Brown, 477 P.2d 67, 70 (Okl.1970); Wootan v. Shaw, 205 Okl. 283 , 237 P.2d 442, 444 (1951). … See, Danculovich v. Brown, supra, 593 P.2d at 194 n.10; Woods, supra, at 14.

Evans v. State

312 P.2d 908 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1957

Whitworth v. State, 32 Okl.Cr. 200 , 239 P. 930 . … We said in Paschall v.

Howe v. Hall

76 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1919

It was held in the ease of Brown v. … Surety Co. v. Turnham, 58 Okla. 583 , 160 Pac. 468 ; Williams v. Kelly, 71 Oklahoma, 176 Pac. 204 ; Callahan v. Callahan, 47 Okla. 542 , 149 Pac. 135 .

Fitzsimmons v. Rauch

197 Okla. 426 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1946

As we pointed out in Cowley-Lanter Lumber Co. v. … Defendants rely upon Blakeney v. Francis, 105 Okla. 11 , 231 P. 464 , and English v. Rogers Lumber Co., 68 Okla. 238 , 173 P. 1046 .

In Re Initiative Petition No. 142, State Question No. 205

183 Okla. 343 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 13, 1938

BATLESS, V. C. J. This involves an appeal from a finding of the Secretary of State that Initiative Petition No. 142 was insufficient. … This discussion of this subject in State v. Olcott, 62 Ore. 277 , 125 P. 303 , is wholesome, and applies here.

BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.

2019 OK 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2019

Board of Governors, etc. , 1996 OK 41 , 913 P.2d at 1345 . 109 Johnson v. … Board of County Commissioners Discussed at Length 1901 OK 28 , 65 P. 940 , 11 Okla. 56 , BOYD v. BRYAN Discussed 2000 OK 68 , 12 P.3d 452 , 71 OBJ 2366, RIVAS v.

Dawkins v. Billingsley

69 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1918

Co. v. … W. 867 ; Belknap v. Ball, 83 Mich. 583 , 47 N. W. 674 , 11 L. R. A. 72, 21 Am. St. Rep. 622 ; Wood v. Boyle, 177 Pa. 620 , 35 Atl. 853 , 55 Am. St. Rep. 747 ; Candrian v. Miller, 98 Wis. 164 , 73 N. W. 1004 .

Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Marcum

182 Okla. 55 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1937

Petitioner also relies upon Harris Meat & Produce Co. v. Brown, 177 Okla. 317 , 59 P. (2d) 280 . … Skelly Oil Co. v. Ellis, supra; Harris Meat & Produce Co. v. Brown, supra.

McCormick v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.

84 Okla. 54 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1921

In the case of Brown v. M. K. & T. Ry. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 69 S. … Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 173 S. W. 943 .

In Re State Funding Bonds of 1935, Series B

173 Okla. 626 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1935

OSBORN, V. C. J. … This is an original proceeding brought in the Supreme Court through the State Board of Equalization pursuant to the provisions of article 1, chapter 27, Oklahoma Session Laws 1935, the same being House Bill No. 217, as enacted

Spence v. Norick

513 P.2d 1295 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 31, 1973

Bates v. Old Mac Coal Co., Okl., 271 P.2d 315 . … In Morgan v.