Case law

Boyd v. Board of Parole

23 Or. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1975

On June 18, 1975 the State Board of Parole afforded him a hearing, after which it rescinded the parole action it had formerly taken, because of petitioner’s demonstrated inability to properly handle his situation, and recommended … See Morrissey v. Brewer, supra, 408 US at 489 ; ORS 144.343(3) (a). We hold the Morrissey and statutory requirements did not apply to petitioner because he was not in parole status. In Bailleaux v.

Gowan-Lenning-Brown Co. v. Kingman

116 Or. 650 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1925

The rent was reckoned at $75 per month, and the board and room of the daughter at $20 per month. There is no testimony that either of these terms was unreasonable. … State v. Steeves, 29 Or. 85 ( 43 Pac. 947 ). This principle is also announced in Chance v. Graham, 76 Or. 199 ( 148 Pac. 63 ), and in Sabin v. Kyniston, 81 Or. 358 ( 159 Pac. 69 ).

Walker v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 4, 2025

Board of Parole judicial imposition of fees and costs in amounts so oner- ous as to unreasonably limit access to the courts.” Allen v. Employment Dept., 184 Or App 681, 688, 57 P3d 903 (2002). … See Bradley v.

Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board

344 Or. App. 319 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2025

In March 2021, following briefing, we affirmed the board’s order without opinion. Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board, 309 Or App 596, 481 P3d 313, rev den, 368 Or 637 (2021). … Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board, 368 Or 637, 496 P3d 630 (2021). That brings us directly to the new case before us.

Brown v. Bunch Tire Bailer, Inc.

73 Or. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 1985

See Fulgham v. SAIF, 63 Or App 731, 734-35 , 666 P2d 850 (1983). We hold that the dismissal of the case in issue was error on this record. … The Board, in promulgating OAR 436-83-310, limited its discretion and must act in accordance therewith. See Wyers v. Dressier, 42 Or App 799, 807-08 , 601 P2d 1268 (1979).

Brown v. Hayden Island Amusement Co.

233 Or. 416 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1963

Brown testified that “If you looked real close you could see it * * *.” Mrs. Brown described the marker as “very pale.” The plaintiff was not asked and did not testify whether she observed the markers. … In Johnson v. Hot Springs Land & Imp.

Nakashima v. Board of Education

206 Or. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 2006

To begin with, we addressed — and rejected — it in Montgomery v. Board of Education, 188 Or App 63, 71-77 , 71 P3d 94 (2003). … See, e.g., Kinross Copper Corp. v.

Robertson v. State Land Board

42 Or. 183 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1902

of Supervisors v. … In McIntire v. Wood, 11 U.

State Land Board v. SAUSE

217 Or. 52 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1959

This is an appeal by the state through its land board (ORS 273.410) from a decree of the circuit court which, after trial of the suit, dismissed the complaint that the board had filed in the name of the state. … Pierce of the state land board by the attorney general and found in 26 Ops Atty Gen 167. The issue involved was the power of the state land board to lease a privately dredged navigable channel between two tidal rivers.

Stacey v. Board of Accountancy

26 Or. App. 541 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 1976

Co. v. Hill, 235 Or 352, 356-57 , 384 P2d 219 (1963). … In Gantenbein v.

Meriweather v. Board of Parole

97 Or. App. 212 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1989

Consequently, the state argues, the Board acted properly under the statute. It is unclear from the present record which rule the Board applied. … Meriweather v. Board of Parole, 92 Or App 705 , 759 P2d 1141 (1988).

Rise v. Board of Parole

304 Or. 385 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1987

In Santobello v. … See, e.g., Palermo v.

Engle v. State Land Board

164 Or. 109 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1940

J., Abatement and Revival, section 303, note 16, page 175, citing Selden v. Illinois Trust Etc. Bank, 239 Ill. 67 , 87 N. E. 860 , 130 Am. St. Rep. 180 and note; Hitt v. Scammon, 82 Ill. 519 ; Turney v. … J., Escheat, sec. 42, at page 862, notes 78-81, citing Fenstermacher v. State, 19 Or. 504 , 25 P. 142 ; White v. White, 2 Metc. (Ky.) 185, Com. v. Thomas, 140 Ky. 789 , 131 S. W. 797 .

Hein v. Board of Parole

56 Or. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 1982

It is uncontested that petitioner is a person over whom the Board exercises control and that the Board’s order setting the parole release date is a “final order” within the meaning of ORS 144.335(1). Harris v. … The Board contends that such a holding would “nullify” our decision in Cruz v.

Waltz v. Board of Parole

18 Or. App. 652 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 23, 1974

with Morrissey v. … Brewer, supra, by the granting of a dispositional hearing by the Board or its designated representative in Oregon or in Alaska. The Parole Board acknowledged its lack of compliance with Morrissey v.

Board of Regents v. Hutchinson

46 Or. 57 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1905

Weatherford, the president of the board of regents, Mr. Daly, its secretary, and Mr. … A. 115); Sing On v. Brown, 44 Or. 11 ( 74 Pac. 207 ).

United States v. Brown

477 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 4, 1979

S. v. … S. v. Clardy, 540 F.2d 436, at 442 (9th Cir. 1976). Nonetheless, as a general rule, such disclosures are rarely ordered. U. S. v. Clardy, supra; U. S. v. Richter, 488 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1973).

Yankee v. Oregon Medical Board

280 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 2016

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a default final order of the Oregon Medical Board (the board) that revoked petitioner’s license to practice medicine and assessed a civil penalty. … The board responds that “the rule required the board determine, as a factual matter, whether there was any dispute over petitioner’s reasons for not appearing at the hearing,” and that the board correctly stated and applied

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Brown

33 Or. App. 423 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 1978

In State v. Briggs, 245 Or 503 , 420 P2d 71 (1967), and State v.

Sowell v. Workmen's Compensation Board

2 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 11, 1970

In Re Clark, 79 Or 325 , 154 P 748 , 155 P 187 (1916); State ex rel Venn v. Reid, 207 Or 617 , 298 P2d 990 (1956); and Johnson v. Craddock et al, 228 Or 308 , 365 P2d 89 (1961). … In Riesland v.