Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.14s
140 N.Y. 344 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1893
(Cook v. Travis, 20 N. Y. 400 : Brown v. Valkenburg, 64 id. 76: Pope v. Allen, 90 id. 298.) … (Trustees, etc., Town of East Hampton v. Kirk, 84 N. Y. 220 ; Jackson v. Halstead, 5 Cowen, 216; Baker v. Van Valkenburgh, 29 Barb. 319 .)
Cited 22 timesPublished3 A.D.3d 743 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 22, 2004
While interference with visitation can, under certain circumstances, be sufficient to warrant a change in custody (see Ahmad v Naviwala, 306 AD2d 588, 591 [2003], lv dismissed 100 NY2d 615 [2003]; Brodsky v Brodsky, 267 AD2d … 897, 898-899 [1999]), the paramount concern remains the best interest of the child (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171 [1982]; Barney v Barney, 301 AD2d 950, 951 [2003]; Matter of Grenier v Allen, 296 AD2d 619, 620
Cited 7 timesPublished82 A.D.3d 1698 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 25, 2011
People v Wise, 49 AD3d 1198, 1199 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 940 [2008], reconsideration denied 10 NY3d 966 [2008]; People v Caballero, 23 AD3d 1031 , 1032 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 846 [2006]). … Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-799 [1985]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).
Cited 16 timesPublished4 Johns. Ch. 303 · New York Court of Chancery · Jan 27, 1820
I have had occasion frequently to lay down this rule; (Dunscomb v. Dunscomb, Manning v. Manning, and Schiefflin v. Stewart, 1 Johns. Ch. … In Newton v.
Cited 8 timesPublished4 Rob. 688 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 30, 1866
(Van Dyne v. Thayre, 19 Wend. 162 . *701 Cooper v. Whitney, 3 Hill, 95 . Balter v. Chase, 6 id. 482. Runyan v. Stewart, 12 Barb. 537 .) … Bank of Utica v. City of Utica, 4 Paige, 399 . Ludlow v. Simond, 2 Caine’s Cas. 1. Truscott v. King, 6 N. Y. Rep. 147 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished91 A.D.2d 287 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 27, 1983
However, a breach of that duty only subjects the attorney to liability for malpractice (see Johnson v Gold, 71 AD2d 1056 ; Calhoun v Gale, 29 AD2d 766, affd 23 NY2d 756 ). … Exclusive Envelope Corp., 84 AD 2d 365 ; see Video Corp. of Amer. v Flatto Assoc., 85 AD2d 448, 451 ).
Overruled on other grounds by Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C., 164 A.D.2d 149 (1990)Cited 23 timesPublished91 N.Y.2d 116 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1997
Her injuries were the direct result of her knowing participation in joyriding (see, Barker v Kallash, supra, 63 NY2d, at 25, 32 ; cf., Humphrey v State of New York, 60 NY2d 742, 744 ). … Amidon also testified that she found the keys under a set of papers out of plain view and therefore plaintiffs claim that the Browns violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 (a) 2 is likewise without merit (see, Banellis v
Cited 53 timesPublished668 F. Supp. 146 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 25, 1987
See Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 , *148 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). … Vance v. Heckler, 757 F.2d 1324 , 1327 n. 7 (D.C.Cir.1985).
Cited 3 timesPublished185 A.D.3d 414 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 2, 2020
People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 03725 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 03725 Decided on July 2, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … Decided on July 2, 2020 Richter, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ. 11737 3086/17 [*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Phillip Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Janet E.
Cited 0 timesPublished18 N.Y.S. 490 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1892
The rule is well stated in the case of Lowenstein v. Salinger, (Sup.) 17 N. Y.
Cited 6 timesPublished3 A.D.3d 648 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 8, 2004
Brown and Sherill Brown for the January 2000 accident and defendant Gary H. Pickens (hereinafter defendant) for the July 2000 accident. … Elliott, 57 NY2d 230, 236 [1982]) “as to be considered insignificant within the meaning of Insurance Law 5102 (d)” (Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., supra at 353; see Mrozinski v St.
Cited 11 timesPublished11 Johns. 166 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1814
As the judgment obtained before the other justice, (Hoes,) in favour of Posson against Brown, was given in evidence, it is most probable that the present suit was brought to recover back the money recovered of the plaintiff
Cited 8 timesPublished68 A.D.3d 1150 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 3, 2009
1157, 1158 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 742 [2009]; People v Thompkins, 58 AD3d 1068, 1068 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 822 [2009]). … 733 [2008]; People v McKeney, 45 AD3d 974, 975 [2007]).
Cited 7 timesPublishedBROWN & BROWN, INC. v. JOHNSON, THERESA A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2014
BROWN & BROWN, INC. AND BROWN & BROWN OF NEW YORK, INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, V OPINION AND ORDER THERESA A. … Same Opinion by WHALEN, J. as in Brown & Brown, Inc. v Johnson, et al. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 7, 2014]). Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E.
Cited 0 timesPublished57 A.D.2d 1000 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 12, 1977
This court will not disturb such a determination unless it is not reasonably grounded (Kielman v Enterprise Stores, 38 AD2d 629 ). … This court has, on occasion, awarded new trials unless the defendant agreed to stipulate to increase the verdict (Rivera v Presbyterian Hosp., 55 AD2d 998 ; Bonder v Berman, 43 AD2d 653 ).
Cited 20 timesPublished189 A.D.3d 701 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 29, 2020
People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 08011 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 08011 Decided on December 29, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § … Ind No. 3057/14 Appeal No. 12624 Case No. 2015-2477 [*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Warren Brown, Defendant-Appellant.
Cited 1 timesPublished5 Sandf. 224 · The Superior Court of New York City · Nov 15, 1851
We believe the law remains as it was laid down in Johnson v. Pie, 1 Kel. 905 and 913 (S. … It is stated in that case that the same point was held the previous term, in the case of Grove v. Nevil.
Cited 16 timesPublished
Ask Donna