Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.37s
Brown v. Allied Plumbing & Heating Co.
129 N.J.L. 442 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 3, 1943
The claim of causation must not be broken by some new intervening agency (McDonough v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 127 N. J. L. 158). This is the English rule, cited in McDonough v. … Bryant v. Fissell, 84 N. J. L. 72.
Cited 14 timesPublished210 N.J. 107 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 9, 2012
Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion textR. KREVOLIN & CO., INC. v. Brown
20 N.J. Super. 85 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 9, 1952
KREVOLIN & CO., INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS J. BROWN AND DOROTHY J. BROWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued May 26, 1952. … Gillespie v. Ferguson Company, 78 N.J.L. 470 ; Sadler v. Young, Id. 594; Brientnall [ Breintnall ] v. Sadler, 82 Id. 405; Pierson v. N.Y. & S.W.R. Co., 83 Id. 661; McAndrews & Forbes Co. v. Camden, 78 N.J. Eq. 244 .
Cited 21 timesPublished89 N.J. Eq. 326 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Jul 11, 1918
Lane, V. C. (orally). … Jonas Glass Co. v. Glass Bottle Blowers’ Association, 77 N. J. Eq. 219; Gompers v. Buck Stove and R. Co., 221 U. S. 418 ; 55 L. Ed. 797; Hinchman Coal and Coke Co., v. Mitchell, U. S.
Cited 2 timesPublished134 N.J. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 10, 1993
Cited 0 timesPublished67 N.J. 392 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 5, 1975
Ereddie Brown instituted this action against Lins Pharmacy, Inc., a drug store, and A. J. S. … R. 67; Kellam v. Akers Motor Lines, Inc., 133 N. J. L. 1, 3 (E. & A. 1945); Garafola v. Rosecliff Realty Co., Inc., 24 N. J. Super. 28, 42 (App. Div. 1952).
Cited 3 timesPublished74 N.J. 286 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1977
Cited 0 timesPublishedInza Development Corp. v. Brown
47 N.J. 422 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 31, 1966
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.
69 N.J.L. 474 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1903
Brown v. Parchment Paper Co., 36 Vroom 111 . … Clark v. Jenkins, 162 Mass. 397 .
Cited 9 timesPublished41 N.J. 116 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1963
Cited 20 timesPublishedNo opinion textBrown v. Lexington & Danville Railroad
13 N.J. Eq. 191 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Oct 15, 1860
The railroad company, by their complaint in that cause, after setting out the contract between the parties, claimed from the defendant sixty-five dollars on the one hundred of the amount of the bonds disposed of by Brown, … By his answer to this complaint, Brown, the defendant, set up by way of defence, among other matter's — the powers conferred upon him by the company as their agent and trustee; the exchange of the bonds for real estate in
Cited 0 timesPublished93 N.J.L. 449 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 1919
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Morrisey & Walker, Inc.
7 N.J. Misc. 414 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 19, 1929
Cited 0 timesPublished272 N.J. Super. 173 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 8, 1994
Respondent American Red Cross appeals from a judgment of the Division of Workers’ Compensation in favor of petitioner Dorothy Brown. … Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 66 Cal.2d 944 , 59 Cal.Rptr. 622, 624-25 , 428 P.2d 606, 608-09 (1967).
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Township of Old Bridge
319 N.J. Super. 476 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 19, 1999
In an unpublished opinion, we held in Brown v. … During oral argument in Brown v.
Cited 30 timesPublishedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 9, 2020
See State v. … (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Brown, 216 N.J. 508, 535 (2014))).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished5 N.J. Misc. 397 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 18, 1927
Bowne v. Logan, 43 N. J. L. 423; Allen v. Freeholders of Hunterdon, 72 Id. 116. This is a salutary rule and should be rigidly adhered to and not frittered away by unwise applications or by fine distinctions.
Cited 1 timesPublished30 N.J. Eq. 478 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1879
The case differs from that of Freehold Mutual Loan Association v. … Brown, 2 Stew. 121 , in this: The question there was, whether the complainant corporation had been deprived, by the revision of the act under which it was created, of a privilege to take premiums for priority of loans because
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Philmac Sportswear Co.
23 N.J. Misc. 378 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Nov 26, 1945
Brown ran over and grabbed Leila from Phil,” and by another witness as “Mrs. Brown tried to get Leila from Phil.” The affair reached such proportions that those in authority at the respondent plant summoned the police. … Emerick v. Slavonian Greek Catholic Union, 93 N. J. L. 282; 108 Atl. Rep. 223 ; Barrese *380 v. Standard Silk and Dyeing Co., 110 N. J. L. 565; 166 Atl. Rep. 179 ; King v. Camden Paving Co., 11 N. J. Mis.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna