Case law

State v. Brown

16 S.W.3d 678 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 2000

Kevin Brown, Defendant, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree assault of a law enforcement officer in violation of Section 565.081.1 RSMo. (1994), as to which he was sentenced

Brown v. Briggs

559 S.W.2d 768 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1977

Ellebracht v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc., 543 S.W.2d 503, 504 [2] (Mo.App.1976); Budg et-E asy, Incorporated v. Burd, 539 S.W.2d 740, 741 [2, 3] (Mo.App.1976); Phillips v. Frazier, 537 S.W.2d 251 (Mo.App.1976).

Harwood v. Brown

23 Mo. App. 69 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1886

Smith's Adm'rs v. Thomas, 29 Mo. 310 , 311 ; Henshaw v. Dutton, 59 Mo. 139 ; Jones v. Shaw, 67 Mo. 667 ; Ewing v. Clark, 76 Mo. 545 ; Gardner v. Matthews, 81 Mo. 627 . … Smith's Adm'rs v. Thomas, supra. According to the allegations of the answer, the original note was not owned by the deceased, R. B. Harwood, at the time of the execution of the notes in suit, he having assigned it to O.

Brown v. State

986 S.W.2d 508 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1999

Dajuan Brown, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing.

Brown v. State

992 S.W.2d 198 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1999

Movant Antwan Brown appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evi-dentiary hearing.

State v. Brown

668 S.W.2d 635 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1984

Benson v. State, 504 S.W.2d 74, 76 (Mo.1974); State v. Simmons, 660 S.W.2d 319 (Mo.App.1983). … State v. Phroper, 619 S.W.2d 83, 90 (Mo.App.1981). Even under the scope of State v. Austin, 620 S.W.2d 42, 43 (Mo.App.1981) of the Eastern District the appellant’s point would be without merit. Unlike State v.

State v. Brown

964 S.W.2d 244 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1998

Brown v. McCormick

23 Mo. App. 181 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1886

Brown v. King

806 S.W.2d 436 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1991

Edgewater Health Care, Inc. v. Health Systems Management, Inc., 752 S.W.2d 860, 868 (Mo.App.1988). … Phillips v. Lively, 708 S.W.2d 369, 373 (Mo.App.1986).

In re Brown ex rel. Brown v. Hill

192 S.W.3d 491 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2006

Brown physical custody of their five-year-old daughter and awarding child support. For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Brown

940 S.W.2d 60 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1997

Riddle v. Brown

37 Mo. App. 550 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1889

Brown and the city of St. … the payment of certain judgments which the plaintiffs have recovered against Brown.

Dwight Laughlin v. Dewayne Perry and Ellen Flottman

Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 30, 2020

See Gross v. … Ct. 1986) (holding public defenders have qualified immunity under Delaware’s state tort claims act and reaffir med by Browne v. Robb, 583 A.2d 949, 951 (Del. 1990), and Hanson v.

Brown v. State

932 S.W.2d 917 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1996

Brown v. State

924 S.W.2d 311 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1996

Brown’s, motion for Rule 24.035 relief after an evidentiary hearing. The motion was timely filed after defendant was sentenced on guilty pleas on three charges: kidnapping, armed criminal action and forcible rape. … State v. Jennings, 649 S.W.2d 448, 455 (Mo.App.1983). Assuming, without deciding the rule confers the right to a pre-sentence investigation, the source of that right is not constitutional.

Price v. Brown

63 Mo. 347 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1876

Brown v. State

530 S.W.2d 56 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1975

In State v. … See also State v.

Brown v. State

926 S.W.2d 151 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1996

Brown appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. Mr. … Brown contends that his guilty plea was entered unknowingly, un-intelligently and involuntarily because counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate whether the state had sufficient information to support a conviction

Castillo v. Brown

918 S.W.2d 347 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1996

Brown for damages arising from an automobile collision at an intersection. The jury entered a verdict which assessed sixty percent of the fault to Mr. Castillo and forty percent of the fault to Ms. Brown.

State v. Brown

936 S.W.2d 868 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1997

Appellant, Richard Brown, appeals the judgment of conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, RSMo § 571.030.1(1) (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury trial. We affirm.