Case law

Bowden v. Dugan

91 Me. 141 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 1, 1898

Mattocks v. Young, 66 Maine, 459; Brown v. Lawton, 87 Maine, 83. … Munson v. Porter, 63 Iowa, 453 ; Jones v. Tarleton, 9 *146 M. & W. 675; Kerford v. Mondel, 5 H. & N. 931.

Tomer v. Maine Human Rights Commission

962 A.2d 335 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 2008

Sys., 428 A.2d 412, 414 (Me.1981) (stating that the Superior Court had jurisdiction of the Board’s decision as "final agency action" within the meaning of section 11002 of the APA); Brown v. State of Me. … A challenger of a Board action is not entitled to have the court decide de novo the issue that was before the Board.

Austin v. Inhabitants of St. Albans

144 Me. 111 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 10, 1949

Brown v. Sanborn, 131 Me. 53 ; 158 A. 855 ; Bradford v. Davis, 143 Me. 124 ; 56 Atl. (2nd) 68. The statute, on which this action depends, is R. … Davis v. Bangor, 101 Me. 311 ; 64 A. 617 ; Keeley v. Portland, 100 Me. 260 ; 61 A. 180 . The action of municipal officers, as such judicial board, must be taken with formality and entered of record.

Jacque's Case

121 Me. 353 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 8, 1922

The Massachusetts Court have gone further and held that the statements in such a report may be considered by the Industrial Accident Board without the report being formally introduced in evidence. … The Board may take judicial notice of it. Carroll’s Case, 285 Mass., 203 , affirmed hi Brown’s Case, 228 Mass., 31 . That question, however, is not before us. The report in this case was formally offered and admitted.

State of Maine v. Richard K. Ntim Jr.

76 A.3d 370 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 17, 2013

Given that Brown v. … See State v. Boyington, 1998 ME 163, ¶ 12 , 714 A.2d 141 . . Brown also identifies police compliance with Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), as an additional factor.

Maine School Administrative District No. 37 v. Pineo

988 A.2d 987 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 18, 2010

See Fredette v. … Bank, 601 A.2d at 1087 -88 (citing Rogers v. Brown, 135 Me. 117, 118-19 , 190 A. 632, 633 (1937) (quotation marks omitted)).

Rounds v. Smart

71 Me. 380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 19, 1880

The decision of the canvassing board, is only prima facie evidence, and not conclusive in direct proceedings to try the right by quo warranto. "But,” remarks Bronson, J., in The People v. … The statute is in accordance with the common law as decided-in Brown v.

Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Eastern Fine Paper, Inc.

559 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 28, 1981

PRIOR PROCEEDINGS The Brown-Bridge Mills, Inc. filed the original complaint in Civ. … See' also Gumer v.

Northeast Occupational Exchange, Inc. v. Bureau of Rehabilitation

473 A.2d 406 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 6, 1984

The drafters of section 11001(1) cited to Isbrandtsen Co. v. United States, 211 F.2d 51 (D.C.Cir.), cert, denied, Federal Maritime Board v. … See 22 M.R.S.A. ch. 713. . 5 M.R.S.A. § 11001(1) provides; .In Brown v.

Mathieu v. Bath Iron Works

667 A.2d 862 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 5, 1995

See also Bowie v. … Warchalowski v. Brown, 417 A.2d 425, 429 (Me.1980).

Mabee v. Board of Environmental Protection

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 18, 2021

The Board acted as fact-finder in this case and it will be the Board’s findings and conclusions that will be reviewed. … See Beal v. Town of Stockton Springs, 2017 ME 6, ¶ 19, 153 A.3d 768 (quoting Mr. & Mrs. V. v. York Sch. Dist., 434 F. Supp. 2d 5, 12-13 (D.

Bliss v. Junkins

106 Me. 128 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1909

Such interest would disqualify such cornmis-, sioner, the board of commissioners would be without jurisdiction and the action of the board would be void: Conant's Appeal, 102 Maine, 477, 481. … Spofford v. Railroad, 66 Maine, 51, 53; Rockland v. Water Co., 86 Maine, 55, 58; Tracy v. LeBlanc, 89 Maine, 304; Whitmore v. Brown, 102 Maine, 47; Boynton v. Hall, 100 Maine, 131, 132, See also Smart v.

Orcutt v. Feis

298 A.2d 758 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 9, 1973

Masselli v. Fenton, 157 Me. 330 , 172 A.2d 728 (1961); Mississippi & D. Steamship Co. v. Swift, 86 Me. 248 , 29 A. 1063 (1894); Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. Russell, 173 F.2d 620 (10 Cir. 1949).

Martin v. Maine Plumbers' Examining Board

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 4, 2021

See also Narowetz v. Board ofDental Practice, 2021 ME 46 ~ 22, n. 9. C. … See, e.g., Narowetz v. Board ofDental Examiners, 2021 ME 46, ~~ 16-22, _ _A.3d _ _; Lamarre v. Town of China, 2021 ME 45, ~ 16, _ _A.3d ___; Fair Elections Portland, Inc. v.

State v. Johnson

265 A.2d 711 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 21, 1970

Johnson v. Maine Wetlands Control Board, Me., 250 A.2d 825 (Case No. 1) and in which the constitutionality of the Act was challenged. … Van Zee, 158 N.W.2d 111 , [10], [11] 117 (Iowa 1968, flood control Act), *716 and Swisher v. Brown, 157 Colo. 378 , 402 P.2d 621 (1965, marketing control Act). See also Greenleaf-Johnson Lumber Company v.

Stephen T. Witham v. Board of Trustees of the Maine Criminal Justice Academy

290 A.3d 65 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 14, 2023

WITHAM v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE MAINE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACADEMY LAWRENCE, J. [¶1] Stephen T. … P. 2B(d)(2); see also Sulikowski v.

Dowey v. Sanford Housing Authority

516 A.2d 957 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 28, 1986

Your Home, Inc. v. City of Portland, 505 A.2d 488, 489 (Me.1986); see also Lyons v. Board of Dir. of School Admin. Dist. No. 43, 503 A.2d 233, 235 (Me.1986); Bolduc v. … Your Home, Inc., 505 A.2d at 489 ; see also Kelly v. Curtis, 287 A.2d 426, 429 (Me.1972); Rogers v. Brown, 135 Me. 117, 119 , 190 A. 632, 633 (1937).

Brown v. Silver Springs Delivery Svs., Inc.

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 21, 2012

:IfA. / ~ ~~ ..,,t_.e ~ V- ~ 1 $"'fl Ii, -IJ ?.Pl 7 'I "I.. ,3 { ""A-t't> , I 't fs' 9 ) 1 / ~ v ?v..&..t­ ~ fL-r-.J.,1.,,...t .;/ fO fl/2d' ''1'-~S' (°Nf>. { fZ~) ~ ~ V ',,t'?? … _ou MICHAEL BROWN, Plaintiff V.

Department of Human Services v. Earle

481 A.2d 175 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 6, 1984

See Hurd v. … Board of Dental Examiners v. Brown, 448 A.2d 881, 884 (Me.1982) (interpreting 32 M.R.S.A. § 1091(1)(C) governing the practice of dentistry). 5 . Rule 50 provides: Motion for Judgment in Nonjury Case.

Lewis v. Maine Coast Artists

770 A.2d 644 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 4, 2001

We review the decision of the Board directly. See Kosalka v. Town of Georgetown, 2000 ME 106, ¶ 10 , 752 A.2d 188, 186 ; DeSomma v. Town of Casco, 2000 ME 113, ¶ 7 , 755 A.2d 485, 487 . *649 A. … See Brown v.