Case law

Brown v. Children's National Medical Center

773 F. Supp. 2d 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2011

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … See Brown v. Sim, No. 03-2655, 2005 WL 3276190 , at *4 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 2005); Elliott v. Healthcare Corp., 629 A.2d 6, 9 (D.C.1993); see also Duncan v. Children’s Nat’l Med.

Brown v. Gino Morena Enterprises

44 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 1999

Shane v. … See Tynes v.

Brown v. Kone, Inc. 2020K L.P.

841 A.2d 331 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 2004

Brown argues that the trial court never considered a lesser sanction than dismissal. We reverse based upon the factors set forth in Starling v. … McDaniels v. Brown, 740 A.2d 551, 554 (D.C.1999) (citing Toomey v. District of Columbia, 315 A.2d 565, 567 (D.C.1974) (per curiam)).

United States v. James Brown

857 F.3d 403 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 23, 2017

United States v. Brown, 808 F.3d 865, 866 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2)). … United States v. Ransom, 756 F.3d 770, 775 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (quoting United States v. Richart, 662 F.3d 1037, 1052 (8th Cir. 2011)) (emphasis added).

Brown, Yvonne v. United States

389 F.3d 1296 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 3, 2004

Per Curiam: The facts of this case are recounted in Brown v. United States, 271 F. Supp. 2d 225, 226–28 (D.D.C. 2003), and need not be repeated here. … See Shaffer v. Veneman, 325 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Massie v. United States, 166 F.3d 1184 (Fed. Cir. 1999).

United States v. Anthony Brown

921 F.2d 1304 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1991

Throughout both its case-in-chief and its summation, the prosecution did not invoke the evidence of Brown’s prior acts. Cf. United States v. … Because we find the in-court filing satisfactory, we need not reach the question urged upon us by Brown—namely, when does a trial begin for purposes of § 851? Cf. United States v.

Brown v. Dep't of State

317 F. Supp. 3d 370 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 2018

Davis v. U.S. Dep't of Justice , 968 F.2d 1276 , 1279 (D.C. Cir. 1992). … See Students Against Genocide v. Dep't of State , 257 F.3d 828 , 836 (D.C.

Clay v. Brown, Hopkins & Stambaugh

892 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 1995

In Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. … See Fox v.

Country Ford Trucks, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

229 F.3d 1184 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 27, 2000

As the Supreme Court made clear in NLRB v. … See Detroit Edison Co. v.

Nytes v. Trustify, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2018

(quoting Johnson–Brown v. 2200 M St., LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 175, 177 (D.D.C. 2003))). … Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 26 F. Supp. 2d 74, 77 (D.D.C. 1998) (internal quotation marks omitted) (second alteration in original). III.

Brown v. Corr. Corp. of Am.

603 F. Supp. 2d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Brown in his official capacity, plaintiffs Title VII claim is redundant of her Title VII claim against the District, see Cooked-Seals v.

Brown v. Trinity Washington University

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2023

Campbell v. … See Floyd v. Lee, 968 F.

United States v. Jim A. Brown, A/k/a/ Mark A. Brown

859 F.2d 974 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 21, 1988

Nor is the statute vague with respect to Brown itself. Section 841(b) must be considered as it applies to Brown, not as it applies to others or appears in the abstract. See United States v. … See Wayte v. United States, 470 U.S. 598, 608 , 105 S.Ct. 1524, 1531 , 84 L.Ed.2d 547 (1985). Brown has made no such showing here.

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

846 F. Supp. 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 1994

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 839 F.Supp. 905 (D.D.C.1993) ["Mem.Op.”]. 2 . The parties' agreement, read literally, asks this court to tax $150 per diem per witness. … Even if true, this does not disprove that the rates the Brown plaintiffs paid were still below market. 7 . The Laffey fee matrix was developed in Laffey v.

Allen-Brown v. District of Columbia

174 F. Supp. 3d 463 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2016

Currier v. Nat’l Bd. of Med. … Baird v. Gotbaum, 662 F.3d 1246, 1253 (D.C. Cir. 2011). See also Kelly v. LaHood, 840 F.

Brown v. U.S. Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2014

BlatrIct & Bankruptcy Courts for the District at Columbla Stacy Brown, ) Petitioner, l v. l Civil Action No. / 7‘- l U.S. … Thompson v. US. Parole Comm ’n, 553 F. Supp. 1027, 1030 (D.D.C. 1983); see accord Brooks v. US. Parole Comm ’n, 510 F.

Walter A. Brown, Inc. v. Moylan

509 A.2d 98 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 1986

Brown, Inc. (WAB) raises several challenges to an order confirming an arbitration award rendered in favor of appellee Barbara Moylan. … T & M Properties v. ZVFK Architects & Planners, 661 P.2d 1040, 1043 (Wyo.1983); Bloom v.

Brown v. U.S. Supreme Court

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THURMAN JEROME BROWN Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-2042 … (CKK) v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

638 F. Supp. 1479 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 1986

See, e.g., Doe v. Board on Professional Responsibility, 717 F.2d 1424, 1426 (D.C.Cir.1983); Financial General Bankshares, Inc. v. Metzger, 680 F.2d 768, 772 (D.C.Cir.1982). … Brown. See Brady v.

Gary Brown, III v. FBI

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 2025

But Brown misunderstands the nature of the redactions. As the district court explained, the FBI invoked additional exemptions “on nearly every page where [Brown] has challenged the use of Exemption 7(C).” Brown v. … JA 85, 86; United States Department of Justice v.