Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.63s
265 So. 3d 591 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 20, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text12 Vet. App. 460 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jul 7, 1999
See Ford v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 531, 535-36 (1997); Degmetich v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 208, 209 (1995), aff'd, 104 F.3d 1328 (Fed.Cir.1997). II. … See Savage, supra; see also Falzone v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 398, 405 (1995); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 465, 469-70 (1994).
Cited 16 timesPublishedBarney J. Stefl v. R. James Nicholson
21 Vet. App. 120 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 27, 2007
Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039, 1043-44 (Fed.Cir.1994). … Brown, 6 Vet.App. 405, 407 (1994) (quoting Green v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 121, 124 (1991)). The Secretary acknowledges that direct service connection may be available. Supplemental Br. at 3.
Cited 383 timesPublished241 So. 3d 154 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 22, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textBoard of County Commissioners v. Brown
253 Md. 632 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 4, 1969
Board of County Comm’rs for Prince George’s County v. Lightman, 251 Md. 86 , 246 A. 2d 261 (1968); Board of County Comm’rs for Prince George’s County v. … Oursler v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 204 Md. 397 , 104 A. 2d 568 ; Dorsey Enterprises v. Shpak, supra; Erdman v. Board of Zoning Appeals, supra, Montgomery Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished249 S.E.2d 803 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 29, 1978
249 S.E.2d 803 (1978) BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION v. Neil E. BROWN and wife, Ingrid S. Brown. No. 77 Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 29, 1978. Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by James B. Richmond, Sp. Deputy Atty.
Cited 0 timesPublished763 F. Supp. 2d 168 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 2011
Welcome Ctr. v. … Guillen v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedJohnson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
110 Pa. Commw. 142 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1987
See Reider v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 100 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 333 , 514 A.2d 967 (1986) (en banc); LaCamera v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 13 Pa. … See Bandy v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 108 Pa.
Cited 42 timesPublishedKessler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
145 Or. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 9, 1997
Because those claims of error were neither presented to the Board nor are apparent on the face of the record, we do not address them for the first time here. ORAP 5.45(2); State v. … We rejected that *591 argument in Bollinger v. Board of Parole, 142 Or App 81 , 920 P2d 1111 , rev allowed 324 Or 394 (1996).
Cited 11 timesPublished168 A.3d 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text168 A.3d 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text423 S.W.3d 784 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 2014
Brown v. Brown, 362 S.W.3d 508 (Mo.App.2012). In February 2012, Ms. Hendrix filed a motion with the trial court asking the court to order payment of fees to the guardian ad litem for services rendered on appeal. … Niederkorn v.
Cited 70 timesPublished168 A.3d 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text236 So. 3d 1112 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 12, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textDunker v. Brown County Board of Education
80 S.D. 193 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1963
In Brown v. … Glenham Independent School District v. Walworth County Board of Education, 78 S.D.63, 98 N.W.2d 348 . See also School District No. 3 v.
Cited 43 timesPublished235 So. 3d 838 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 12, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text227 So. 3d 567 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 7, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text16 Or. App. 310 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1974
State v. … Fitzgerald does not state whether the definition of “transaction” for purposes of the joinder statute is the same as the definition of “transaction” for purposes of the constitutional rule of State v. Brown, supra.
Cited 30 timesPublished225 So. 3d 831 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 4, 2017
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textSchmuecker v. Lancaster County
321 Neb. 623 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jun 18, 2026
See, also, Hickey v. Civil Serv. Comm. of Douglas Cty., 274 Neb. 554, 741 N.W.2d 649 (2007) (applying framework established in Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, supra note 16). … Schmuecker 18 Hickey v. Civil Serv. Comm. of Douglas Cty., supra note 17, 274 Neb. at 563, 741 N.W.2d at 655 (quoting Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, supra note 16). 19 Nebraska Pub. Emp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna