Case law

Carroll v. Tobriner

253 F. Supp. 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 1966

From a review of the entire record, particularly the testimony of the psychiatrist member of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement Board, Dr. … In Blohm v.

Powell v. United States

684 A.2d 373 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1996

Brown also testified that appellant suggested that she leave town rather than testify. Brown admitted that about ten minutes before the shooting, she had smoked crack cocaine with Anderson. … See, e.g., Cosby v.

California State Board of Optometry v. Federal Trade Commission, National Association of Optometrists and Opticians, Intervenor

924 F.2d 243 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 8, 1991

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), 910 F.2d 976 , the Commission may nonetheless disallow those regulations issued by state and local governmental entities that lie outside the scope of the Parker exemption … , citing Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v.

In Re Edwards

990 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2010

See In re Artis, 883 A.2d 85, 97 (D.C.2005) (“We have held consistently that an attorney who fails to present an issue to the Board waives it and cannot present it for the first time to this court.”); Stockard v. … V.

Philip J. Brown v. Brian Seeber

904 F.2d 78 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 13, 1990

Brown v. Seeber, Civ. No. 88-0644 (D.D.C.) (order) (filed May 2, 1988), Appendix to Brief for Appellees (A.App.) 138. … Brown v. Seeber, Civ. No. 88-0644 (D.D.C.) (order) (filed June 6, 1988), A.App. 139 [hereinafter June 6 Order].

Matter of Dwyer

399 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1979

Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938). According to a lengthy opinion of the Supreme Court, Universal Camera Corp. v. … C. v.

In re Boykins

999 A.2d 166 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 2010

See Menard, Inc. v. … .”); Gulf States *176 Utilities Co. v. FERC, 922 F.2d 873, 876 (D.C.Cir.1991) ("To be sure, multifactor tests are subject to manipulation.

Fairman v. District of Columbia

934 A.2d 438 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2007

Corp. v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm’n, 343 U.S.App. … Lopata, supra, 735 A.2d at 937 (quoting Nghiem v.

Jackson v. POLICE & FIREFIGHTERS RET. BD.

717 A.2d 904 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1998

We find no fault with the Board's determination that the separation agreement was valid under Maryland law. [4] See Frana v. Frana, 12 Md.App. 273 , 278 A.2d 94, 97 (1971). … We do not reach petitioner's alternative position that the Board waived any argument that this court lacks jurisdiction. See Barnett v.

District of Columbia v. Casino Associates, Ltd.

684 A.2d 322 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1996

See also Lake Worth Towers, Inc. v. … See also The Washington Post Co. v.

Irene Raza v. Walter F. Sullivan

432 F.2d 617 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 11, 1971

In Quick v. … Byrne v. Boadle, 1863, 2 H. & C. 722, 159 Eng.Rep. 299. 4 . Even in Brown there was no direction of a verdict at the end of the plaintiff’s ease.

Robert C. Buffkin v. Alum-Co National, Inc.

331 F.2d 96 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 28, 1963

Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 , 83 S.Ct. 227 , 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962); Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc., 371 U.S. 215 , 83 S.Ct. 283 , 9 L.Ed.2d 261 (1962); cf. Gerringer v. … See People of State of New York v. O’Neill, 359 U.S. 1 , 79 S.Ct. 564 , 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959). 4 . Engle v.

Fritch v. U.S. Department of State

220 F. Supp. 3d 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2016

Inc. v. Thompson, 269 F.3d 1077, 1083 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (citing cases). “[T]he court’s review is limited to the administrative record,” Fund for Animals v. Babbitt, 903 F. Supp. 96, 105 (D.D.C. 1995) (citing Camp v. … to its earlier decisions, the court has jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision on that narrow ground, see Jicarilla Apache Nation v.

Wilkerson v. Wackenhut Protective Services, Inc.

813 F. Supp. 2d 61 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2011

See Jameson v. Jameson, 176 F.2d 58, 60 (D.C. … s Reply at 14; McKennon v.

Roberts v. Veterans Cooperative Housing Ass'n

88 A.2d 324 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1952

Corbin, Contracts, § 9. .Bovello v. Falvey Granite Co., Inc., D.C.Mun.App., 71 A.2d 536 . See also Zlotnick v. Crisp, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 339, 340 , 185 F.2d 502, 503 , footnote 2. . … In re Irwin, 162 Or. 221 , 91 P.2d 518 ; Gabrielson v. Gorin, 92 Wash. 408 , 159 P. 387 ; Baldie v. Bank of America Nat. Trust & Savings Ass’n, 97 Cal.App.2d 70 , 217 P.2d 111 .

Gannett Rochester Newspapers, a Division of Gannett Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Newspaper Guild of Rochester, Local 17, Intervenor

988 F.2d 198 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 26, 1993

Though the Board’s counsel before us disavows this “reaffirmation” rule, the Board’s opinion is before us for review, not the post hoc rationalizations of counsel. See Bowen v. Georgetown Univ. … It may be that that is what the Board intended here. Unfortunately for the Board, we cannot affirm on speculation, or on the rationale of counsel, but only on the decision of the Board. SEC v.

Baptist Healthcare of Oklahoma, LLC v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2025

C., Inc. v. … Ctr. v.

Circus Circus Casinos, Inc. v. NLRB

961 F.3d 469 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 2020

for assuring that the Board keeps within reasonable grounds,” Universal Camera Corp. v. … In Wright Line, the Board adopted the Supreme Court’s burden-shifting framework from Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v.

In re Ahaghotu

75 A.3d 251 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 2013

Ahaghotu’s arguments and adopt the Board’s recommendation. A. … See M.A.F. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310 (D.C.1971). Citing a continuing current of discontent with that rule, 11 Mr.

In Re Romansky

825 A.2d 311 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2003

WASHINGTON, Associate Judge: The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) concluded that respondent, Michael A. … Tucker v. Lower, 200 Kan. 1 , 434 P.2d 320, 324 (1967) (citation omitted). Thus, “what may not legally be characterized as an act of fraud, deceit or misrepresentation may still evince dishonesty.”