Case law

Norman v. Norman

86 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1922

See Spradling v. Spradling, 74 Oklahoma, 181 Pac. 148 . It is also within the inherent power of this court to enforce its orders, and in doing this it may dismiss the appeal. In Spradling v. … This rule is supported in: Hall v. Hall, 77 Miss. 741 , 27 South. 636 ; Tuttle v. Tuttle, 21 N. D. 503 , 13 N. W. 460 ; Brown v. Brown, 22 Wyo. 316 , 140 Pac. 829 .

Curtis v. Amquest Bank, N.A.

69 O.B.A.J. 3810 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1998

City of Bethany v. Public Employees Relations Board of the State of Oklahoma, 1995 OK 99 , 904 P.2d 604 . … Morrison v.

Smith v. Griffith

437 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 4, 1977

Plaintiffs assert that notwithstanding the rulings in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Perry v. … In Summers v. Civis, supra, notice and hearing was claimed pursuant to standards of the North Central Association of College and Secondary Schools adopted by the Board of Education, 3 and in Singleterry v. Ind. Sch.

Davis v. Fieker

952 P.2d 505 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 27, 1998

H.L. v. … Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. at 1989 ; Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 , 100 S.Ct. 2671 , 65 L.Ed.2d 784 (1980); Beal v. Doe, 432 U.S. 438 , 97 S.Ct. 2366 , 53 L.Ed.2d 464 (1977); Maher v.

Amoco Pipeline Co. v. Montgomery

487 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1980

See, White v. B. K. Trucking Co., Inc., 405 F.Supp. 1068, 1069-1070 (W.D.Okl. 1975); Sunray DX Oil Company v. Brown, 477 P.2d 67, 70 (Okl.1970); Wootan v. Shaw, 205 Okl. 283 , 237 P.2d 442, 444 (1951). … See, Danculovich v. Brown, supra, 593 P.2d at 194 n.10; Woods, supra, at 14.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 2, 1990

Kimery v. Public Service of Oklahoma, 622 P.2d 1066 (Okla. 1980), quoting Lee Optical v. … See, State v. Knutson, 133 N.W.2d 577 (Neb. 1965), and also Wittler v. Baumgartner, 144 N.W.2d 62 (Neb. 1966).

Opinion No. 80-173 (1981) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 21, 1981

Board of Commissioners v. Bruce, 51 Okl. 541 , 152 P. 125 (1915), relying in part on Moore v. Nation, 80 Kan. 682 , 103 P. 107 (1909). As explained in Moore v. … The concept expressed by Board of Commissioners v. Bruce and Moore v.

Opinion No. 69-312 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 1969

Said insurance may include as additional insureds the board of control and employees of the hospital. . . ." (Emphasis added) In the case of Daniel et al. v. Life Insurance Company of Virginia, Tex. Civ. … Pertinent here is the rule of law pronounced in Shaw v.

Flood v. Town of Shidler

127 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1927

MASON, V. C. J. … This same contention was made in the ease of O’Neil Engineering Company v.

Batson v. State

724 P.2d 253 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 19, 1986

Spuehler v. State, 709 P.2d 202 (Okl.Cr.1985). … See Glaze v. State, 565 P.2d 710 (Okl.Cr.1977).

McGuire v. Oklahoma City Bldg. & Loan Ass'n

139 Okla. 105 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1929

Oklahoma Oity, 107 Okla. 252 , 231 Pac. 855 , and the case of Cherry v. Brown, 79 Okla. 215 , 192 Pac. 227 . … Whitling v. Parshall, 120 Okla. 121 , 252 Pac. 395 . See, also, Cherry v. Brown, 79 Okla. 215 , 192 Pac. 229 ; Abraham v. Roland Oil Co., 135 Okla. 43 , 273 Pac. 997 .

Opinion No. 80-117 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1980

The Oklahoma Supreme Court has upheld the authority of the Board on the granting of permits. In Lowrey v. … This ruling was verified and expounded upon by the court in Hodges v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, Okl., 580 P.2d 980 (1978).

Opinion No. (2008)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 16, 2008

Boyd v. Tietze , 172 P.3d 639 , 643 (Okla.Civ.App. 2007). … Phillips v. Hedges , 124 P.3d 227 , 231 (Okla. 2005).

Protest of Oklahoma Pipe Line Co.

147 Okla. 163 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1931

Co. v. … El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Taylor, 87 Okla. 140 . 209 Pac. 749 ; Hines v. Dalton, 90 Okla. 239 , 217 Pac. 168 .

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 28, 2005

Thrifty Oil Co. v. Bank of Am. Nat'l Trust Sav. Ass'n, 322 F.3d 1039 , 1042 (9th Cir. 2002). ¶ 6 An interest rate swap is fully described in Thrifty Oil Co. v. … Bd. of Educ. v. Cloudman, 92 P.2d 837 , 841 (Okla. 1939). ¶ 18 Two Oklahoma cases are instructive in analyzing powers of school districts. In Cloudman , the Oklahoma Supreme Court clarified the powers of school boards.

Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. Guthrie Independent School District No. I-1

942 F. Supp. 511 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1996

In light of existing OHahoma law, the Court finds Plaintiffs’ reliance on School Board, District No. 18 of Garvin County v. … Mozert v. Hawkins County Board of Education, 827 F.2d 1058, 1066 (6th Cir.1987). That is not the situation before this Court.

George v. Randels

201 Okla. 542 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1949

The State Board of Education shall make such annexation in accordance with the provisions of this Act.” … As stated in the syllabus in Cities Service Oil Co. v.

Opinion No. 69-115 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 5, 1969

Bureau of Indian Affairs, must be classified and supervised by me State Personnel Board. … In Board of County Commissioners v.

Teeter v. City of Edmond

75 O.B.A.J. 388 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 2004

Robinson v. City of Bartlesville Bd. of Education, supra, Walker v. … See also Bidlingmeyer v.

Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Marcum

182 Okla. 55 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1937

Petitioner also relies upon Harris Meat & Produce Co. v. Brown, 177 Okla. 317 , 59 P. (2d) 280 . … Skelly Oil Co. v. Ellis, supra; Harris Meat & Produce Co. v. Brown, supra.