Case law

State v. . Chapman

221 N.C. 157 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 25, 1942

S. v. Caper, 215 N. C., 670 , 2 S. E. (2d), 864 ; S. v. Brown, 218 N. C., 415 , 11 S. E. (2d), 321 ; S. v. Wagstaff, 219 N. C., 15 , 12 S. E. (2d), 657 . This disposes of all of defendant’s exceptions. … S. v. Brown, supra; S. v. Hobbs, 216 N. C., 14 , 3 S. E. (2d), 432 ; S. v. McCollum, 216 N. C., 737 , 6 S. E. (2d), 503 . The evidence of the State and of the defendant is conflicting, sordid, and repulsive.

Parker v. New Hanover County

173 N.C. App. 644 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 2005

Gwathmey v. State, 342 N.C. 287, 298 , 464 S.E.2d 674 , *653 681 (1995). … Rohrer v. Credle, 322 N.C. 522, 527 , 369 S.E.2d 825, 828 (1988).

Matter of Moses H. Cone Memorial Hosp.

113 N.C. App. 562 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1994

App. 335, 341 , 339 S.E.2d 681, 685 (1986) (quoting Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 414 , *571 233 S.E.2d 538, 544 (1977)). … Rainbow Springs Partnership v. County of Macon, 79 N.C. App. 335, 341 , 339 S.E.2d 681, 685 (1986) (quoting Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E.2d 538, 541 (1977)).

State v. Rosser

54 N.C. App. 660 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1981

State v. Brown, 36 N.C. App. 152 , 242 S.E. 2d 890 (1978); State v. Shufford, 34 N.C. App. 115 , 237 S.E. 2d 481 , cert. denied 293 N.C. 592 , 239 S.E. 2d 265 (1977); State v. Best, 31 N.C. … State v. Brown, supra at 153; State v. Cameron, 283 N.C. 191 , 195 S.E. 2d 481 (1973); State v. Yelverton, 18 N.C. App. 337 , 196 S.E. 2d 551 , cert. denied 283 N.C. 670 , 197 S.E. 2d 880 (1973).

Robinson v. FOREST CREEK LTD. PARTNERSHIP

213 N.C. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2011

See Rodman v. … See Mims v.

Jones v. . Casstevens

222 N.C. 411 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1942

Brown on Parol Evidence, 117; Bank v. Winslow, 193 N. C., 470 , 137 S. E., 320 ; Typewriter Co. v. Hardware Co., 143 N. C., 97 , 55 S. E., 417 . In Evans v. Freeman, 142 N. C., 61 , 54 S. … Brown v. Kirkpatrick, 217 N. C., 486 , 8 S. E. (2d), 601 . The rights of the parties are to be determined by the stipulation appearing on the face of the note.

Barr-Mullin, Inc. v. Browning

108 N.C. App. 590 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 8, 1993

Q-CO Industries, Inc. v. Hoffman, 625 F.Supp. at 617 . Defendants next argue the COMPU-RIP software was not a trade secret since defendant Browning rediscovered the COMPU-RIP source code by means of reverse engineering. … Here, a prima facie case of misappropriation exists since defendant Browning helped to develop the COMPU-RIP software during his employ with plaintiff and Browning had access to copies of the COMPU-RIP source code prior to

Blades v. Dewey.

136 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1904

The real point decided is that the language of the general statute will control the election by the board “for the ensuing year.” The case of Westervelt v. Mohsenstecher, 76 Fed. Rep., 118, 34 L. R. … Bank v. Odd Fellows, 48 Penn., 446; Thomas v. Summey, 46 N. C., 554: Welch v. Seymour, 28 Conn., 387 ; 5 Cyc., 773-4; Munford v. Rice, 6 Mun., 87. We do not think that the case of Bank v. Seidensticker, 92 N. W.

Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. Atlantic Coast Line R.

88 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 24, 1950

In the case of Virginian Railway Co. v. … Radford Iron Co. v. Appalachian Electric Power Co., 4 Cir., 62 F.2d 940, 942 .

Moore v. Whitley

234 N.C. 150 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1951

See Booker v. Highlands, 198 N.C. 282 , 151 S.E. 635 ; Brown v. Clement Co., 217 N.C. 47 , 6 S.E. 2d 842 . See also Cherry v. Andrews, 229 N.C. 333 , 49 S.E. 2d 641 . … See Brown v. Hodges, 232 N.C. 537 , 61 S.E. 2d 603 .

State v. . Sheffield

183 N.C. 783 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 26, 1922

Sheriff Brown immediately carried him before a justice of tbe peace, and on tbe way defendant told him there was no use of having a trial, that be would just waive examination. … S. v. Burchfield, 149 N. C., 537 , which seems to answer fully all tbe contentions of tbe defendant in 'this respect.

Robinson v. Grading

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 18, 2010

Ralph Maxy, a board certified orthopedic surgeon, on May 23, 2008. During his deposition, Dr. Maxy compared the findings of Dr. Myles' May 5, 2008, note with his note of May 23, 2008. According to Dr. … Stat. § 97-22 ; Gregory v. W.A. Brown Sons , 363 N.C. 750 , 688 S.E.2d 431 (2010); Richardson v.

Zow v. Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina

District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 26, 2024

of North Carolina (“UNC”) System’s Board of Governors (the “Board”). … In Donald v.

Ashe Cty. v. Ashe Cty. Plan. Bd.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 2, 2022

V. ASHE CNTY. PLAN. … Once we have received the NCDENR Air 1 A County ordinance authorized the Ashe County Planning Board to act as Ashe County’s board of adjustment.  ASHE CNTY. V.

King v. Guilford County

152 N.C. 438 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 27, 1910

The plaintiff is chairman of the Board of Highway Commissioners of Guilford. … "We have just passed upon a similar claim by a member of the board of commissioners of Guilford in Davidson v. Guilford, ante, 436.

In re A.T.

191 N.C. App. 372 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 2008

In re McKinney, 158 N.C.App. 441 , 443, 581 S.E.2d 793 , 795 (2003) (quoting Haker-Volkening v. Haker, 143 N.C.App. 688 , 693, 547 S.E.2d 127 , 130 (2001) and Harris v. … Jones v. Brinson, 238 N.C. 506 , 509, 78 S.E.2d 334 , 337 (1953) (citations omitted). Under N.C.

State v. Rankin

257 N.C. App. 354 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 2, 2018

We find our prior decisions in State v. Trimble, 44 N.C. App. 659, 262 S.E.2d 299 (1980) and State v. Brown, 56 N.C. - 11 -  STATE V. … State v. Brown, 56 N.C. App. 228, 230, 287 S.E.2d 421, 423 (1982). This Court, in State v. Hinkle, 189 N.C. App. at 769, 659 S.E.2d at 38, stated that the “ ‘except . . .

Dearman v. Bruns

279 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1971

DEARMAN, Executor of the Estate of Richard Shaw Brown v. Lula Rumple BRUNS, Widow, Individually and as Executrix of Minnie Rumple Brown et al. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 6, 1971. William P.

Howard v. Food Lion, Inc.

232 F. Supp. 2d 585 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 23, 2002

Pippen v. Scales, 822 F.Supp. 305, 309 (M.D.N.C. 1993) (quoting Hoke v. Board of Med. … Lapides v. Board of Regents of the Univ.

Witty v. . Barham

147 N.C. 479 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 22, 1908

Bunn v. Todd, 107 N. C., 266 . … This statute was held constitutional (Hall v. Walker, 118 N. C., 377 ) and has been cited as authority. Brown v. Brown, 121 N. C., 10; Finger v. Hunter, 130 N. C., 531; Smith v. Bruton, 137 N. C., 81.