Case law

Bauman v. Pasquotank Cty. ABC Bd.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2020

Plaintiff argues that the Board had no adverse possession during the term of the trust because Emma was estopped from suing to eject the Board under the theory of estoppel by deed. See, e.g., Crawley v. … Brooks v.

McCracken v. Greensboro, Northern & Atlantic Railway Co.

168 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 13, 1915

The County of Randolph v. … Sprunt v. May, 156 N. C., 388 ; Hutchins v. Bank, 128 N. C., 72 .

In Re the Will of Smith

249 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1959

Weir v. Humphries, 39 N.C. 264 ; Royster v. Royster, 61 N.C. 226 ; Houston v. Smith, 88 N.C. 312 ; Redding v. Vogt, 140 N.C. 562 , 53 S.E. 337 , 6 Ann. Cas. 312; Thomas v. Bunch, 158 N.C. 175 , 73 S.E. 899 ; 17A Am. … Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1 , 95 S.E. 2d 118 ; Luther v. Luther, 234 N.C. 429 , 67 S.E. 2d 345 ; Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556 , 31 S.E. 2d 529 ; Davis v. Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 .

Sloan Financial Group, Inc. v. Beckett

358 N.C. 146 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2004

New Africa Investment Management, LLC and New Africa Advisers, Inc., Plaintiffs and Cross-Claim Defendants, New Africa Opportunity Fund, L.P., d/b/a ZM Africa Investment Fund, L.P., Plaintiff-Intervenor and Cross-Claimant v. … Thelen Reid & Priest, LLP, by Mark Fox Evens, pro hac vice, Washington, DC; and Brown & Bunch, PLLC, by LeAnn Nease Brown, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff-appellees and defendant-appellee Maceo K. Sloan.

Long Props., LLC v. City of Trinity

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 21, 2026

LONG PROPS., LLC V. … V.

White v. Crisp

138 N.C. App. 516 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 2000

In Crossman v. … Furthermore, in Meyer v.

Rowe v. Walker

340 N.C. 107 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1995

ROWE, Jr., and Donna Grant Rowe v. John Thomas WALKER, C. Norman Walker and Shirley Walker Kennedy. No. 181A94. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 7, 1995. Manning, Fulton & Skinner, P.A. by John I. … Brown & Bunch by Charles Gordon Brown and Scott D. Zimmerman, Chapel Hill, for defendants-appellants. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

Matter of Moses H. Cone Memorial Hosp.

113 N.C. App. 562 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1994

App. 335, 341 , 339 S.E.2d 681, 685 (1986) (quoting Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 414 , *571 233 S.E.2d 538, 544 (1977)). … Rainbow Springs Partnership v. County of Macon, 79 N.C. App. 335, 341 , 339 S.E.2d 681, 685 (1986) (quoting Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E.2d 538, 541 (1977)).

Bemont v. Isenhour

249 N.C. 106 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1958

Sledge v. Wagoner, 248 N.C. 631 ; Lee v. Green & Co., 236 N.C. 83 , 72 S.E. 2d 33 ; Hahn v. Perkins, 228 N.C. 727 , 46 S.E. 2d 854 ; Pafford v. Construction Co., 217 N.C. 730 , 9 S.E. 2d 408 ; Brigman v. … Harris v. Department Stores Co., 247 N.C. 195 ; Sledge v. *108 Wagoner, supra: Copeland v. Phthisic, 245 N.C. 580 , 96 S.E. 2d 697 ; Revis v. Orr, 234 N.C. 158 , 66 S.E. 2d 652 .

Howard v. Food Lion, Inc.

232 F. Supp. 2d 585 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Oct 23, 2002

Pippen v. Scales, 822 F.Supp. 305, 309 (M.D.N.C. 1993) (quoting Hoke v. Board of Med. … Lapides v. Board of Regents of the Univ.

Robinson v. FOREST CREEK LTD. PARTNERSHIP

213 N.C. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2011

See Rodman v. … See Mims v.

Blades v. Dewey.

136 N.C. 176 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 11, 1904

The real point decided is that the language of the general statute will control the election by the board “for the ensuing year.” The case of Westervelt v. Mohsenstecher, 76 Fed. Rep., 118, 34 L. R. … Bank v. Odd Fellows, 48 Penn., 446; Thomas v. Summey, 46 N. C., 554: Welch v. Seymour, 28 Conn., 387 ; 5 Cyc., 773-4; Munford v. Rice, 6 Mun., 87. We do not think that the case of Bank v. Seidensticker, 92 N. W.

Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. Atlantic Coast Line R.

88 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 24, 1950

In the case of Virginian Railway Co. v. … Radford Iron Co. v. Appalachian Electric Power Co., 4 Cir., 62 F.2d 940, 942 .

Moore v. Whitley

234 N.C. 150 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1951

See Booker v. Highlands, 198 N.C. 282 , 151 S.E. 635 ; Brown v. Clement Co., 217 N.C. 47 , 6 S.E. 2d 842 . See also Cherry v. Andrews, 229 N.C. 333 , 49 S.E. 2d 641 . … See Brown v. Hodges, 232 N.C. 537 , 61 S.E. 2d 603 .

State v. . Sheffield

183 N.C. 783 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 26, 1922

Sheriff Brown immediately carried him before a justice of tbe peace, and on tbe way defendant told him there was no use of having a trial, that be would just waive examination. … S. v. Burchfield, 149 N. C., 537 , which seems to answer fully all tbe contentions of tbe defendant in 'this respect.

In Re the Appeal of Whiteside Estates, Inc.

136 N.C. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 18, 2000

Company v. Property Tax Comm., 48 N.C. App. 245, 257 , 269 S.E.2d 636, 643 (1980), disc. review denied, 301 N.C. 727 , 276 S.E.2d 287 (1981). … In discussing King and related cases, our Supreme Court held in Brock v.

In re A.T.

191 N.C. App. 372 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 2008

In re McKinney, 158 N.C.App. 441 , 443, 581 S.E.2d 793 , 795 (2003) (quoting Haker-Volkening v. Haker, 143 N.C.App. 688 , 693, 547 S.E.2d 127 , 130 (2001) and Harris v. … Jones v. Brinson, 238 N.C. 506 , 509, 78 S.E.2d 334 , 337 (1953) (citations omitted). Under N.C.

Brewer v. Rent-A-Ctr.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 2, 2023

David Jones, an expert, board-certified neurosurgeon. Dr. … The case was initially heard on 9 December 2020 before Deputy Commissioner Mary Claire Brown.

Burney v. Berryhill

276 F. Supp. 3d 496 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 22, 2017

See Hill v. … See Herrmann v.

Zander v. Orange Cnty.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2023

Stat. § 160D-106 (emphasis added); see also Brown v. … Brown, 353 N.C. 220, 224, 539 S.E.2d 621, 623 (2000) (“Although the title of an act cannot control when the text is clear, the title is an indication of legislative intent.” (citation omitted)); Ray v. N.C.