Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.44s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1980
When any such election is held, the decision of the school district electorate is binding upon the school board. … Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954).
Cited 0 timesPublishedProtest of Oklahoma Pipe Line Co.
147 Okla. 163 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1931
Co. v. … El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Taylor, 87 Okla. 140 . 209 Pac. 749 ; Hines v. Dalton, 90 Okla. 239 , 217 Pac. 168 .
Cited 2 timesPublished192 Okla. 582 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1943
Schulte v. Herndon, 184 Okla. 77 , 84 P. 2d 607 ; Hill v. Henry, 190 Okla. 413 , 124 P. 2d 405 , and Knisely v. Board of Trustees, Town of Skiatook, 192 Okla. 1 , 134 P. 2d 971 . … The form thereof is the same as the form examined and approved in Cooper v. Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County, 188 Okla. 42 , 105 P. 2d 1052 . The two lots described in the deed are presumed to be one parcel. Flint v.
Cited 6 timesPublished96 Okla. 44 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 9, 1923
Stat. 1921, and cite the case of Kelly v. … This contention is not well taken, as decided by this court in the case of Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Woodworth, 89 Okla. 192 , 214 Pac. 1077 .
Cited 14 timesPublished66 Okla. Crim. 108 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 1939
He was boarding with us and working for another fellow on the place, too, and was working for us to take care of things — just working for his board and taking care of things. … street, east of the Fair Grounds, and turned south to the right, and saw a colored man going up the road, north down Brown street, and we got even with him, I stopped him.
Cited 1 timesPublished503 P.2d 1270 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1972
In Davis v. Foley, 60 Okl. 87 , 159 P. 646 , we held that an action may be maintained upon a judgment, although the judgment creditor has the right to issue execution thereon. … In discussing the Davis case in Board of Education of City of Drumright v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 3, 1979
In addition, the chairman and members of said Pardon and Parole Board shall receive their actual and necessary expenses while attending and going to and from meetings of the Board and in performing their official duties, … The Court in Reubin v.
Cited 0 timesPublished201 Okla. 542 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1949
The State Board of Education shall make such annexation in accordance with the provisions of this Act.” … As stated in the syllabus in Cities Service Oil Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1978
Pursuant to the statutory authority granted the Board of Regents of Oklahoma Colleges under the provisions of 70 O.S. 3206 [ 70-3206 ] and 70 O.S. 3510 [ 70-3510 ] (1971), the Board of Regents have adopted its policy manual … Refer generally, 47 O.S. 1 -101 [ 47-1-101 ] (1971), Parker v. State, Okl. Cr., 424 P.2d 997 (1967), U.S. v. Ray, 488 F.2d 15 (1973).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 14, 2024
See Morganroth & Morganroth v. DeLorean, 213 F.3d 1301, 1313 (10th Cir. 2000); see also Brown v. Presbyterian Healthcare Serv., 101 F.3d 1324, 1332 (10th Cir. 1996). … In the Report and Recommendation, Judge Erwin first recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against the Oklahoma County Board of Commissioners because he “alleged no custom or policy attributable to the Board
Cited 0 timesUnknownOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1976
county commissioners of the counties in the State of Oklahoma, boards of public and higher education in the State of Oklahoma and all other boards, bureaus, commissions, agencies, trusteeships or authorities in the State … This language appears to be in conflict with a subsequent decision of the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Oldham v.
Cited 0 timesPublished231 P.3d 757 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 2010
State v. McMahon, 1998 OK CIV APP 103, ¶ 10 , 959 P.2d 607, 608 ; Buechler v. State, 2008 OK CIV APP 1, ¶ 13 , 175 P.3d 966, 971 . … of Oklahoma County, a petition for review of such decision, against the Board of Review.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGreen Construction Co. v. Empire District Electric Co.
92 Okla. 127 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923
Board of Education of the City of Shawnee, 39 Okla. 716 , 136 Pac. 595 ; of Shawnee, 39 Okla. 716 , 136 Pac. 595 ;: School Dist. No. 27, Craig County, v. Graham, 45 Okla. 531 , 146 Pac. 213 . … Richards, 54 Okla. 418 , 153 Pac. 177 ; Smith v. Maher, 54 Okla. 49 , 202 Pac. 321 ; Campbell v. Thomas-Godfrey L. & L. Co. 81 Okla. 201 , 197 Pac. 452 ; Klein v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedIn re Sandridge Energy, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
302 F.R.D. 628 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 22, 2014
Kahn v. … [were] a product of the Board’s valid exercise of its business judgment.” Pfeiffer v. Leedle, 2013 WL 5988416 *4 (Del. Ch.2013).
Cited 1 timesPublished189 Okla. 398 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 1941
Within due time plaintiffs gave notice of their appeal to the district court of Tulsa county from the finding of the county board of equalization, and the defendant completed a transcript of the proceedings before said board … J., CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY and BAYLESS, JJ., concur. OSBORN, GIBSON, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., dissent. .
Cited 1 timesPublished591 B.R. 68 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 4, 2018
See In re Brown , 371 B.R. 486 , 497 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2007), amended by 371 B.R. 505 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2007). See Turner v. Davis, Gillenwater & Lynch (In re Inv. … See Grogan v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1978
We recognize the case of City of Altus, Oklahoma v. Carr, 255 F. Supp. 828 (W.D. Tex. 1966), as dealing with a similar issue, but find it not dispositive of this question. … Inc. v. Cottrell (Miss. 1976), 96 S.Ct. 923 , 424 U.S. 366 , 47 L.Ed.2d 55 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedMontgomery v. State Industrial Commission
190 Okla. 439 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 14, 1942
Board of Commissioners, etc., v. Sims, 166 Okla. 298 , 27 P. 2d 633 , and cases there cited. … Such was the rule applied in Board of Commissioners v. Sims, above.
Cited 11 timesPublishedGulf Oil Corporation v. Simmons
197 Okla. 677 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1946
V. … In Shuffield v. Taylor, 125 Tex. 601 , 83 S.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 7, 1979
Board of Education, City of Ardmore v. State, Okla. 109 P. 563 (1910). In construing any statute, the primary rule of construction is to ascertain and declare the intention of the Legislature. Midwest City v. … Adams v. Fry, Okla. 230 P.2d 915 , 1951 .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna