Case law

United States v. Singhal

800 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2010

Furthermore, he asserts that pursuant to United States v. … Boca Investerings P’ship v.

Whittaker v. Munoz

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 2019

See Atwater v. … Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 (1983).

Matter of Miller

553 A.2d 201 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1989

MACK, Associate Judge: On this appeal the basic issue is whether a sanction of one year’s suspension recommended by the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) for a violation by respondent of Disciplinary Rule 1-102 … The Board avoids this question by concluding that even if the lower standard is applicable, respondent has failed to meet this burden. Other courts have adopted the higher standard. See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v.

Fouch v. District of Columbia

10 F. Supp. 3d 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Rogers v. Boatright, 709 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2013); Brown v. Fornter, 518 F.3d 552 (8th Cir. 2008).

Beckford v. United States

950 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 1997

See, for example, Williams v. Baker, 572 A.2d 1062 (D.C.1990); District of Columbia v. Cooper, 483 A.2d 317, 321 (D.C.1984). … Mitchell, 533 A.2d at 629 ; District of Columbia v. Brown, 589 A.2d 384, 387 (D.C.1991).

Voegeli v. Phelan

District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2025

Saint-Fleur v. McHugh, 83 F. … Corp. v. Sebelius, 14 903 F. Supp. 2d 39, 58–59 n.10 (D.D.C. 2012). No doubt “the Board’s reasoning could . . . be clearer and more thorough.” McKinney v.

In Re Harkins

899 A.2d 755 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 18, 2006

See Harkins v. United States, 810 A.2d 895 (D.C.2002). The facts of the underlying incident are detailed in our previous opinion: On the morning of October 8, 1999, the [victim], Ms. … Mungo v. United States, 772 A.2d 240, 245 (D.C.2001).

Thorne v. Cavazos

744 F. Supp. 348 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 1990

Brown v. Hartshorne Public School Dist. No. 1, 864 F.2d 680, 682 (10th Cir.1988) (citing Kirkland v. Buffalo Bd. of Educ., 622 F.2d 1066, 1068 (2d Cir.1980); Gottlieb v. … The Davis Court also reaffirmed its earlier holding in Brown v.

Lee v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

411 A.2d 635 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 1980

See Wheeler v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra at 88-89; Dietrich v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra at 473. … See also Brewington v. Board of Appeals & Review, supra.

Tinner v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

703 A.2d 833 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1997

See Joseph v. District of Columbia Bd. of Medicine, 587 A.2d 1085, 1088 (D.C.1991); Superior Beverages v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 567 A.2d 1319, 1325 (D.C.1989). … V. In sum, although the Board’s single sitting requirement may result in an unwelcome outcome for applicants situated similarly to Dr.

Matter of Bond

519 A.2d 165 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 1986

*166 PER CURIAM: By order of March 31, 1986, we suspended respondent from the practice of law, pending a formal proceeding before the Board on Professional Responsibility as to the nature of the final discipline to be imposed … See, e.g., United States v. Alston, 197 U.S.App.D.C. 276, 283 , 609 F.2d 531, 538 (1979); Post v.

Teles Ag v. Kappos

846 F. Supp. 2d 102 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2012

See FDA v. … v.

Matter of Burton

472 A.2d 831 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1984

In Simmons v. … In Johnstone v.

Allied Aviation Service Comp. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 2017

Before: BROWN, SRINIVASAN and PILLARD, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge PILLARD. … That ratification remedied the Appointments Clause defect in the 2012 Board panel’s order. Cf. ManorCare of Kingston PA, LLC v. NLRB, 823 F.3d 81, 90 (D.C. Cir. 2016); Doolin Sec. Sav. Bank v.

United States v. McFadden

722 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 1989

In Terry v. … See e.g., Peters v. New York, decided together with Sibron v.

Morrell J. Roddy v. Civil Aeronautics Board and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency

299 F.2d 136 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 1962

RODDY, Petitioner, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency, Respondents. No. 16515. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Jan. 24, 1962.

Daniel ex rel. M.H. v. District of Columbia

174 F. Supp. 3d 532 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2016

Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 80 F.Supp.3d 90, 99 (D.D.C.2015); Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435 n. 11, 103 S.Ct. 1933 . … See Dist. of Columbia v. Doe, 611 F.3d 888, 890 (D.C.Cir.2010). . Plaintiffs’ invoice reflects work done by oth- ' er individuals, including other Brown & Associates attorneys and 'an educational advocate. Pi.

United States v. Gayden

492 A.2d 868 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1985

Brown v. Illinois, supra; Dunaway v. … Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. at 602 , 95 S.Ct. at 2261 .

Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 and Employers' Health and Welfare Fund v. The Madison Hotel, Inc.

97 F.3d 1479 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 15, 1996

Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 and Employers’ Health and Welfare Fund, et al. v. Madison Hotel, Inc., 896 F.Supp. 14 (D.D.C.1995). … Co. v.

Griffith v. Barnes

560 F. Supp. 2d 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2008

Brown (“Brown”) (collectively “Defendants”) engaged in a predatory loan scheme whereby they fraudulently took title to Griffith’s house and re-sold it without her knowledge. … Duggan v.