Case law

Glenn-Robinson v. Acker

140 N.C. App. 606 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 2000

Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428 , 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989). A. Section 1983 claims Preliminarily, we note “a municipal entity has no claim to immunity in a section 1983 suit.” Moore v. … Board of Comm’rs of Bryan City v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 137 L. Ed. 2d 626, 640 (1997); see also Spell, 824 F.2d at 1388 (plaintiff must prove an “affirmative link” between the custom and the violation).

Simonel v. North Carolina School of the Arts

119 N.C. App. 772 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1995

Alexander v. N.C. Department of Human Resources, 116 N.C. App. 15, 17 , 446 S.E.2d 847, 849-850 , disc. review denied, 338 N.C. 514 , 452 S.E.2d 805 (1994). … Inc., v. N.C. Dept. of Natural Resources, 80 N.C. App. 201, 206 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 112 (1986).

Rice v. Wood

82 N.C. App. 318 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1986

Summey v. Cauthen, 283 N.C. 640 , 197 S.E. 2d 549 (1973). The motion should be denied if there is “any evidence more than a scintilla” sufficient to support plaintiffs’ prima facie case. Cunningham v. Brown, 62 N.C. … O’Briant v. Lee, supra. Looking at the five factors stated by the court in O’Briant v.

Kinston Cotton Mills v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.

185 N.C. 7 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1923

of said corporation, and said corporation shall be bound to pay thereon, as and when declared by said board of directors, a dividend at such rate and at such time or times per annum as shall be determined by said board of … Farrish v. Cotton Mills, 157 N. C., 188 ; Power Co. v. Mills Co., 154 N. C., 76 ; Warren v. King, 108 U. S., 389 ; Lloyd v. Pa. Electric Co., 75 N. J. Eq., 263; Black v. Hobart Trust Co., 64 N. J. Eq., 415; Hamlin v.

Briggs v. City of Raleigh

166 N.C. 149 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1914

In Grey v. … Tbe notice recited tbat it was published by authority of tbe board of commissioners, and under instructions from them. In tbe case of Lawson v. Ry.

Stone v. State

191 N.C. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2008

See Municipality of Anchorage v. Gallion, 944 P.2d 436 (Alaska 1997); Dadisman v. Moore, 384 S.E.2d 816 (W. Va. 1989); Valdes v. Cory, 189 Cal. Rptr. 212 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983); Sgaglione v. … Levitt, 337 N.E.2d 592 (N.Y. 1975); Weaver v. Evans, 495 P.2d 639 (Wash. 1972); Dombrowski v. City of Philadelphia, 245 A.2d 238 (Pa. 1968); State Teachers’ Retirement Board v. Giessel, 106 N.W.2d 301 (Wis. 1960). B.

Sanderson v. Saia Motor Freight Lines, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 13, 2009

Brown III. 12. Dr. Brown's medical records prior to August 8, 2005 relate Plaintiff's condition and work restrictions to Plaintiff's right foot injury, not a right calf rash. 13. Plaintiff provided Mr. … Russell v. Lowes Prod. Distribution , 108 N.C. App. 762 , 765 , 425 S.E.2d 454 , 457 (1993). 3.

Aoun & Cole, Inc. v. Fitzpatrick

808 S.E.2d 177 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 2017

App. at ----, --- S.E.2d at ----; Brown v. Lifford , 136 N.C. … App. at ----, S.E.2d at ----; Brown , 136 N.C. App. at 382 , 524 S.E.2d at 589 .

Messer v. Smathers

213 N.C. 183 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1938

Moore v. Board of Education, 212 N. C., 499 ; Crabtree v. Board of Education, 199 N. C., 645 , 155 S. E., 550 ; Clark v. McQueen, 195 N. C., 714 , 143 S. E., 528 ; Board of Education v. Forrest, 190 N. C., 753 , 130 S. … E., 621 ; McInnish v. Board of Education, 187 N. C., 494 , 122 S. E., 182 ; School Com. v. Board of Education, 186 N. C., 643 , 120 S. E., 202 ; Davenport v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 570 , 112 S. E., 246 ; Dula v.

State v. Keen

309 N.C. 158 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 9, 1983

He, in effect, expressed an opinion as to the guilt of defendant. *163 In State v. Brown, 300 N.C. 731, 733 , 268 S.E. 2d 201, 203 (1980), Justice Carlton, speaking for this Court and relying on State v. … See State v. Bass, 253 N.C. 318 , 116 S.E. 2d 772 (1960).

Maready v. City of Winston-Salem

342 N.C. 708 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1996

City of Raleigh, 253 N.C. 400 , 116 S.E.2d 923 (1960); Municipal Hospital: Trustees of Rex Hosp. v. Board of Comm’rs of Wake Co., 239 N.C. 312 , 79 S.E.2d 892 (1954); Burleson v. … Printy, 351 N.W.2d 319 (Minn. 1984); Board of Supervisors of Lamar Co. v. Hattiesburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 448 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 1984); State ex rel. Wagner v. St. Louis Co.

Harris v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

230 N.C. 485 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1949

Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 217 N.C. 368 , 8 S.E. 2d 199 ; Fox v. Tea Co., 209 N.C. 115 , 182 S.E. 662 ; Sams v. Hotel Raleigh, 205 N.C. 758 , 172 *488 S.E. 371; Cooke v. … Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., supra; Anderson v. Amusement Co., 213 N.C. 130 , 195 S.E. 386 ; Parker v. Tea Co., supra; Bowden v. Kress, supra.

Leaksville Cotton Mills v. Commissioners of Rockingham County

184 N.C. 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 25, 1922

Mclver, was present at the meeting of the board on 5 December, 1921. The building of the-road, in violation of this decision of the board of county commissioners, has been properly arrested. Woolen Mills v. … The chairman of the board, who took Mclver’s view of these matters in the case of Woolen Mills v. Land Co., supra, is now acting in entire accord with the other members of the board in the present controversy.

Copper Ex Rel. Copper v. Denlinger

193 N.C. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 21, 2008

See State v. … Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. Slavin, 147 N.C. App. 52, 60 , 554 S.E.2d 840, 847 (2001). Thus, Board policy 4301.10 is properly before the Court.

Rowland v. . B. L. Association

118 N.C. 173 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

When this case was first before this Court (Rowland v. B. and L. … The petition to rehear was allowed, and the judgment below was ordered to be reformed, as appears in this case, Rowland v. B. and L. Association , 116 N.C. 877 .

In Re the Will of Smith

249 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1959

Weir v. Humphries, 39 N.C. 264 ; Royster v. Royster, 61 N.C. 226 ; Houston v. Smith, 88 N.C. 312 ; Redding v. Vogt, 140 N.C. 562 , 53 S.E. 337 , 6 Ann. Cas. 312; Thomas v. Bunch, 158 N.C. 175 , 73 S.E. 899 ; 17A Am. … Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1 , 95 S.E. 2d 118 ; Luther v. Luther, 234 N.C. 429 , 67 S.E. 2d 345 ; Brown v. Brown, 224 N.C. 556 , 31 S.E. 2d 529 ; Davis v. Davis, 213 N.C. 537 , 196 S.E. 819 .

State v. Allen

171 N.C. App. 71 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2005

Brown (Officer Brown) of the Winston-Salem Police Department responded to a telephone call reporting gunfire. … In State v.

Hunter Haven Farms

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 2024

The petitioner named as respondent the local board of adjustment instead of naming the Town. Id. The local board of adjustment -6-  HUNTER HAVEN FARMS, LLC V. … COA COA23-662 – Hunter Haven Farms, LLC v. The City of Greenville Board of Adjustment HAMPSON, Judge, concurring.

Wilkinson v. SRW/Cary Associates

112 N.C. App. 846 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1993

Brown v. Owens, 251 N.C. 348 , 111 S.E.2d 705 (1959); Blanton v. Sisk, supra. … Brown, 251 N.C. at 350 , 111 S.E.2d at 707 . Defendants contend that Brown v. Owens is no longer sound authority because the North Carolina Supreme Court has, in Barnaby v.

Bateman v. Bateman

232 N.C. 659 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1950

Hyder v. Hyder, 215 N.C. 239 , 1 S.E. 2d 540 ; Pollard v. Pollard, 221 N.C. 46 , 19 S.E. 2d 1 ; Trull v. Trull, supra. … Page v. Page, 161 N.C. 170 , 76 S.E. 619 .