Case law

Williams v. State

27 Ala. App. 525 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1937

In the case of Rivers et al. v. … Henderson v. Tennessee C., I. & Ry. Co., 190 Ala. 126 , 67 So. 414 ; Pratt v. Birmingham Ry., L. & P. Co., 191 Ala. 638 , 68 So. 151 ; Lampley v. State, 6 Ala.App. 23 , 60 So. 415 . In Chandler v.

State Tenure Commission v. Page

777 So. 2d 126 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Aug 18, 2000

Stallworth v. City of Evergreen, 680 So.2d 229 (Ala. 1996). … James v. Board of School Comm'rs of Mobile County, Ala., 484 F. Supp. 705 , 715 (S.D.Ala. 1979), quoting Stewart v. Bailey, 556 F.2d 281 , 285 (5th Cir. 1977).

City of Wetumpka v. Central Elmore Water Auth.

703 So. 2d 907 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 12, 1997

See CSL Utilities, Inc. v. … See City of Montgomery v.

Shepherd v. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co.

233 Ala. 324 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 7, 1937

Justice Brown, is to the effect that the demurrer should have been sustained to the bill. … J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Clark v. Fancher

662 So. 2d 258 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 19, 1995

Inc. v. … See also Methodist Homes for the Aging v. Stewart , 594 So.2d 161 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992).

Wade v. State

51 Ala. App. 441 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 30, 1973

Alabama Co. v. Brown, 207 Ala. 18, 25 , 92 So. 490 ; Myers v. Moorer, 273 Ala. 18 , 134 So.2d 168 . … See Brown v. Dean [1910] A.C. 2 . Almon, Tyson and Harris, .TJ., concurring in result.

Medlin v. Crosby

583 So. 2d 1290 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 14, 1991

Borak is board certified in internal medicine, and Dr. Crosby is board certified in family medicine. … Hilliard v. Binford's Heirs , 10 Ala. 977 , 996 ; Harris v. Parker , 41 Ala. 604 , 615 , 616 ; Porter v. State , 58 Ala. 66 ; Rutland v. Emanuel , 202 Ala. 269 , 80 So. 107 ."

Daniels v. Bowers

518 So. 2d 736 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Oct 7, 1987

Thompson , 477 So.2d 427 ; Stewart v. Hilyer , 376 So.2d 727 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979). … Gulf Coast Media, Inc. v. Mobile Press Register, Inc. , 470 So.2d 1211 (Ala. 1985); Mitchell v. State Child Abuse Neglect Prevention Board , 512 So.2d 778 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987).

Fullenwilder v. State

946 So. 2d 899 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Feb 3, 2006

See, e.g., Brown v. Texas, supra , at 51; United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, supra , at 884. … Brown v. Texas , 443 U.S. 47 (1979).

Riverbend Partnership v. City of Mobile

457 So. 2d 371 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 28, 1984

Nelson v. Donaldson , 255 Ala. 76 , 50 So.2d 244 (1951). … Hall v. City of Tuscaloosa , 421 So.2d 1244 (Ala. 1982). Section 9 of Mobile's zoning ordinance is void because it contravenes and alters the intended purpose of § 11-52-80 , Code of Alabama 1975.

Davidson v. Blackwood

250 Ala. 263 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 26, 1948

Brown, 215 Ala. 205, 208 , 110 So. 384, 385 ; Fuller v. Scarborough, 239 Ala. 681, 683 , 196 So. 875 . The amended bill was also good against the demurrer assigning laches. … J., and BROWN and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

City of Mobile v. Sorrell

271 Ala. 468 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 17, 1960

Brackett v. Board of Appeal, 311 Mass. 52 , 39 N.E. 2d 956, 961 . See further cases at 168 A.L.R. 25 et seq. … Nelson v. Donaldson, supra; Board of Zoning Adjustment, etc. v. Boykin, 265 Ala. 504 , 92 So. 2d 906 . Affirmed. LIVINGSTON, C. J., and GOODWYN and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Weeks v. Housing Authority

887 F. Supp. 2d 1232 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 24, 2012

Her initial complaint named the Opp Housing Authority and its board of commissioners as defendants. (Compl. at ¶¶ 6, 7-11, ECF No. 1.) … Diamond, 884 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1989); Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. Brown, 600 F.2d 429, 432-33 (3d Cir.1979). B.

Waste Disposal, Inc. v. Stewart

432 So. 2d 1255 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 3, 1983

See Limbaugh v. Johnston , 393 So.2d 963 (Ala. 1981), and McDowell-Purcell, Inc. v. Bass , 370 So.2d 942 (Ala. 1979). … Although the Board of Health's actions were certainly indirect, we are unable to conclude that its actions were arbitrary or capricious. In State Department of Pensions and Security v.

Sgb Const. Services v. Ray Sumlin Const.

644 So. 2d 892 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 6, 1994

See Sumlin v. Hagan Storm Fence Co. of Mobile , 409 So.2d 818 (Ala. 1982). The trial court found that the Board is a public agency incorporated under Ala. … See Medical Clinic Board of the City of Birmingham-Crestwood v. Smelley , 408 So.2d 1203 (Ala. 1981).

State v. Murphy

45 Ala. App. 637 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 6, 1970

Dale County Board of Equalization, 283 Ala. 437 , 218 So.2d 150 ; Hamilton v. Adkins, 250 Ala. 557 , 35 So.2d 183 . In the case of Hamilton v. … It was held that there was no such design or intention on the part of the board in the Hamilton v. Adkins case.

Ex Parte Reed

492 So. 2d 293 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 7, 1986

Defendant cites this Court to the case of Patton v. … Parker v. State , 397 So.2d 199 (Ala.Crim.App. 1981). Patton v. City of Decatur , 337 So.2d 321 (Ala. 1976).

Blackmon v. King Metals Co.

553 So. 2d 105 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 27, 1989

Menefee v. Veal , 484 So.2d 437 (Ala. 1986); Brown v. Brown , 513 So.2d 617 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987). … Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Blalock , 525 So.2d 1366 , 1369-70 (Ala. 1988). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting Blackmon's new legal arguments made in his post-judgment motions.

Carney v. City of Dothan

158 F. Supp. 3d 1263 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jan 28, 2016

(See Doc. # 43, at 90 (citing Brown v. City of Opelika, 211 Fed.Appx. 862, 863 (11th Cir.2006).) Whether decision makers knew of the protected activity, however, speaks to the causation element of the prima facie case. … See Watson v.

Woods v. State

37 Ala. App. 668 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1954

The indictment against this appellant charged him with the murder in the second degree of Burley Brown. … Alabama Power Co. v. Hall, 212 Ala. 638 , 103 So. 867 ; Ruffin v. State, 30 Ala.App. 344 , 6 So.2d 455 , and numerous cases cited in each of the above authorities. Reversed and remanded.