Case law

Glenn-Robinson v. Acker

140 N.C. App. 606 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 2000

Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427, 428 , 378 S.E.2d 778, 779 (1989). A. Section 1983 claims Preliminarily, we note “a municipal entity has no claim to immunity in a section 1983 suit.” Moore v. … Board of Comm’rs of Bryan City v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 137 L. Ed. 2d 626, 640 (1997); see also Spell, 824 F.2d at 1388 (plaintiff must prove an “affirmative link” between the custom and the violation).

Simonel v. North Carolina School of the Arts

119 N.C. App. 772 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 15, 1995

Alexander v. N.C. Department of Human Resources, 116 N.C. App. 15, 17 , 446 S.E.2d 847, 849-850 , disc. review denied, 338 N.C. 514 , 452 S.E.2d 805 (1994). … Inc., v. N.C. Dept. of Natural Resources, 80 N.C. App. 201, 206 , 341 S.E.2d 108, 112 (1986).

Kinston Cotton Mills v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.

185 N.C. 7 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1923

of said corporation, and said corporation shall be bound to pay thereon, as and when declared by said board of directors, a dividend at such rate and at such time or times per annum as shall be determined by said board of … Farrish v. Cotton Mills, 157 N. C., 188 ; Power Co. v. Mills Co., 154 N. C., 76 ; Warren v. King, 108 U. S., 389 ; Lloyd v. Pa. Electric Co., 75 N. J. Eq., 263; Black v. Hobart Trust Co., 64 N. J. Eq., 415; Hamlin v.

Stone v. State

191 N.C. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2008

See Municipality of Anchorage v. Gallion, 944 P.2d 436 (Alaska 1997); Dadisman v. Moore, 384 S.E.2d 816 (W. Va. 1989); Valdes v. Cory, 189 Cal. Rptr. 212 (Cal. Ct. App. 1983); Sgaglione v. … Levitt, 337 N.E.2d 592 (N.Y. 1975); Weaver v. Evans, 495 P.2d 639 (Wash. 1972); Dombrowski v. City of Philadelphia, 245 A.2d 238 (Pa. 1968); State Teachers’ Retirement Board v. Giessel, 106 N.W.2d 301 (Wis. 1960). B.

Aoun & Cole, Inc. v. Fitzpatrick

808 S.E.2d 177 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 2017

App. at ----, --- S.E.2d at ----; Brown v. Lifford , 136 N.C. … App. at ----, S.E.2d at ----; Brown , 136 N.C. App. at 382 , 524 S.E.2d at 589 .

State v. Keen

309 N.C. 158 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 9, 1983

He, in effect, expressed an opinion as to the guilt of defendant. *163 In State v. Brown, 300 N.C. 731, 733 , 268 S.E. 2d 201, 203 (1980), Justice Carlton, speaking for this Court and relying on State v. … See State v. Bass, 253 N.C. 318 , 116 S.E. 2d 772 (1960).

Maready v. City of Winston-Salem

342 N.C. 708 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1996

City of Raleigh, 253 N.C. 400 , 116 S.E.2d 923 (1960); Municipal Hospital: Trustees of Rex Hosp. v. Board of Comm’rs of Wake Co., 239 N.C. 312 , 79 S.E.2d 892 (1954); Burleson v. … Printy, 351 N.W.2d 319 (Minn. 1984); Board of Supervisors of Lamar Co. v. Hattiesburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 448 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 1984); State ex rel. Wagner v. St. Louis Co.

Harris v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

230 N.C. 485 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1949

Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 217 N.C. 368 , 8 S.E. 2d 199 ; Fox v. Tea Co., 209 N.C. 115 , 182 S.E. 662 ; Sams v. Hotel Raleigh, 205 N.C. 758 , 172 *488 S.E. 371; Cooke v. … Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., supra; Anderson v. Amusement Co., 213 N.C. 130 , 195 S.E. 386 ; Parker v. Tea Co., supra; Bowden v. Kress, supra.

Copper Ex Rel. Copper v. Denlinger

193 N.C. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 21, 2008

See State v. … Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. Slavin, 147 N.C. App. 52, 60 , 554 S.E.2d 840, 847 (2001). Thus, Board policy 4301.10 is properly before the Court.

Rowland v. . B. L. Association

118 N.C. 173 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1896

When this case was first before this Court (Rowland v. B. and L. … The petition to rehear was allowed, and the judgment below was ordered to be reformed, as appears in this case, Rowland v. B. and L. Association , 116 N.C. 877 .

State v. Cabbagestalk

266 N.C. App. 106 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 18, 2019

State v. Brown, 248 N.C. App. 72, 74, 787 S.E.2d 81, 84 (2016) (internal marks and citation omitted). … See Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 48-49, 99 S. Ct. 2637, 2639, 61 L.

Rice v. Wood

82 N.C. App. 318 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1986

Summey v. Cauthen, 283 N.C. 640 , 197 S.E. 2d 549 (1973). The motion should be denied if there is “any evidence more than a scintilla” sufficient to support plaintiffs’ prima facie case. Cunningham v. Brown, 62 N.C. … O’Briant v. Lee, supra. Looking at the five factors stated by the court in O’Briant v.

Wilkinson v. SRW/Cary Associates

112 N.C. App. 846 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1993

Brown v. Owens, 251 N.C. 348 , 111 S.E.2d 705 (1959); Blanton v. Sisk, supra. … Brown, 251 N.C. at 350 , 111 S.E.2d at 707 . Defendants contend that Brown v. Owens is no longer sound authority because the North Carolina Supreme Court has, in Barnaby v.

Bridges Ex Rel. City of Charlotte v. City of Charlotte

221 N.C. 472 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 24, 1942

Davie , 189 Cal. 715 , 209 P. 1008 ; Talbott v. Independent School District of Des Moines , 230 Iowa 949 , 299 N.W. 556 ; Retirement Board v. McGovern , 316 Pa., 161 , 174 A. 400 . 3. … Hood, Comr. of Banks, v. Realty, Inc. , 211 N.C. 582 , 191 S.E. 410 ; Glenn v. Board of Education , 210 N.C. 525 , 187 S.E. 781 .

Suggs v. Williamson Truck Lines

253 N.C. 148 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1960

Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 299 , 42 S.E. 2d 71 ; Wood v. Miller, 226 N.C. 567 , 39 S.E. 2d 608 . … Brown v.

Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Payne

118 N.C. App. 54 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1995

Accordingly, our review of the Review Board’s order is de novo. Brooks v. Ansco & Assocs., 114 N.C. App. 711, 717 , 443 S.E.2d 89, 92 (1994). … Co. v. Brooks, 73 N.C.

Coble v. Coble

300 N.C. 708 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1980

Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98 , 225 S.E. 2d 816 (1976). … Knutton v. Cofield, 273 N.C. 355 , 160 S.E. 2d 29 (1968); Davis v. Davis, 11 N.C. App. 115 , 180 S.E. 2d 374 (1971).

Medlin v. Curran

243 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 21, 1956

On hearing of appeal in this Court, it was not controverted that the Board of Elections aforesaid has proceeded as authorized, so that now the matter is a fact accomplished, that is, fait ac-compli. … See Austin v. Dare County, 240 N.C. 662 , 83 S.E. 2d 702 . Appeal dismissed.

Smith v. Raymond

2010 NCBC 18 · North Carolina Business Court · Oct 21, 2010

Smith v. Raymond, 2010 NCBC 18. … Stepak v. Dean, 434 A.2d 388, 390 (Del. Ch. 1981).

City of Asheville v. Huskey

204 N.C. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 18, 2010

Harris v. NCNB, 85 N.C. App. 669, 670 , 355 S.E.2d 838, 840 (1987); see also Burgin v. Owen, 181 N.C. … This means that the court must hear or try the case on its merits from beginning to end as if no trial or hearing had been held by the Board and without any presumption in favor of the Board's decision. Warren v.