Case law

Opinion No. 70-245 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 17, 1970

In the case of Alexander et al v. Richie, et al, 132 W. … Undoubtedly the sale of supplies to the Board by the Corporation and payment therefor constituted a contract. Hunt v. Allen, supra.

Zwingle v. Tyson's Foods, Inc.

241 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1965

People’s Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co., 246 U.S. 79 , 38 S.Ct. 233 , 62 L.Ed. 587 ; Mebco Realty Holding Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, (D.C.N.J., 1942), 45 F.Supp. 340 ; Lawlor v. … The test appears to be set out in United States v.

Beveridge v. Westgate Oil Co.

171 Okla. 360 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

OSBORN, V. O. J. … Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Hoard v. Ashley

171 Okla. 169 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Witt v. Wentz, 142 Okla. 128 , 286 P. 796 ; Purcell-Lexington Toll Bridge Co. v. Leeper, 148 Okla. 27 , 296 P. 969 . The writ can issue to no one except a party beneficially interested. Section 7S1, O. … J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, BUSBY, PHELPS, and CORN, JJ., concur. WELCH, J., absent.

Opinion No. 68-358 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 3, 1968

Do authorized agents of the State Board of Agriculture have the authority to make complaints in their official capacity as agents of the Board?" … U.S. v. Watasha, 102 F.2d 428 (10th Cir. 1939). However, the Board of Agriculture has been given express authority to appoint authorized agents to perform certain services for the Board.

Offutt v. Fizz-O Water Co.

187 Okla. 522 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1940

Skirvin v. Bass Furniture & Carpet Co., 43 Okla. 440 , 143 P. 190 ; Whitney v. Harris, 157 Okla. 186 , 11 P. 2d 153 ; Smith v. Graham Brown Shoe Co., 179 Okla. 559 , 67 P. 2d 448 . The appeal is dismissed. BAYLESS, C. … J., WELCH, V. C. J., and HURST, DAVISON, and DANNER, JJ., concur.

Opinion No. 76-258 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 12, 1976

Following the rule regarding statutory construction and legislative intent set out in Stemmons, Inc. v. Universal C.I.T. … The principle of this rule of statutory construction is followed in Oliver v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 359 P.2d 183 (1960).

Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Creek v. Oklahoma Tax Comm.

190 Okla. 658 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1942

In Cowart v. … In Crawford v.

Beam v. State

66 Okla. Crim. 14 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1939

Lovett, sheriff of Dewey county, testified that with Deputy Sheriff Brown he answered Mr. … Wood v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 436, 437 , 112 P. 11 , 45 L.R.A., N. S., 673; Caudill v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 66 , 130 P. 812 ; Webber v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 323 , 193 P. 48 ; Barrett v. State, 39 Okla. Cr. 50 , 263 P. 166 .

Friedman v. Weisz

8 Okla. 392 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1899

(Douglass v. Wolf, 6 Kan. 88 .) … (Provins v. Lovi, 6 Okla. 94 , 50 Pac. 81 ; Jay v. Zeisness, 6 Okla. 591 , 52 Pac. 928 .) The errors complained of are not sufficient to warrant a reversal of the judgment.

Batson v. State

724 P.2d 253 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 19, 1986

Spuehler v. State, 709 P.2d 202 (Okl.Cr.1985). … See Glaze v. State, 565 P.2d 710 (Okl.Cr.1977).

Matter of Protest of 1990-1991 Budget

848 P.2d 30 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 28, 1992

METRO AREA VOCATIONAL-TECHNICAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 22, Operating as Metro Tech; Warren Gardner, President, Board of Education; Del Hamm, Clerk, Board of Education; Oklahoma County Excise Board; Ralph Hess, County Clerk; … Board of Comm'rs of Cherokee Co. v. Hatfield, 121 Okl. 28 , 247 P. 77 (1926). The Legislature has no power to direct the judiciary in the interpretation of existing statutes.

Busey v. Crump

108 Okla. 73 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1925

County Attorney and Election Board of Seminole County v. Purported Election Officials of Cromwell, seeking to have the election declared void. … Banta, secretary of the county election board of Seminole county. At the same time, Mr. Banta wrote a letter to Mr.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 26, 1994

THE STATUTORY DUTY OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO MANAGE THE BUSINESS AND AFFAIRS OF THE COOPERATIVE IS MORE LIKE THE FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD OF A PRIVATE CORPORATION. … A CASE SIMILAR TO THE SITUATION POSED IS SCHOENBAUM V. ORANGE COUNTY CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS.

Opinion No. 68-281 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1968

The Board may then adopt the proposed regulations or refer them both to the Commission for further consideration." … Symonds v. Bucklin, Maryland, 197 F. Supp. 682 . Windsor v. Whitby, 95 Conn. 357 , 111 A. 354 ., 12 A.L.R. 669 .

Rudd v. Wilson

32 Okla. 85 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 6, 1912

In Nettograph Machine Co. v. Brown et al., 19 Okla. 77 , 91 Pac. 849 , Mr. … P. & P. 729; Parson v. Haskell, 30 Ill. App. 444 ; Mattoon v. Holmes, 14 Ill. App. 392 ; Green v. Plalack, 25 Tex. 417 ; Richter v. Presno Canal Co., 101 Cal. 582 , 36 Pac. 96 ; Davis v.

Opinion No. 70-266 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1970

But those sections have no application to a community junior college, which is administered by a board of trustees rather than a Board of Regents. … Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954). It is therefore the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the negative.

Freeman v. State

43 Okla. Crim. 186 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 25, 1929

Brown v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. xiii , 115 Pac. 603 . … Schave v. State, 4 Okla. Cr. 286 , 111 Pac. 962 . The case is affirmed. DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Rider v. McLeod

323 P.2d 741 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1958

And in Pierce v. … Palmer v. Ragen, 7 Cir., 159 F.2d 356 ; Whitten v. Bennett, 7 Cir., 141 E.2d 295; People ex rel. Ross v. Becker, 382 Ill. 404, 414 , 47 N.E.2d 475, 480 ; United States ex rel. Hunke v.

Salyer v. Jackson

105 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 30, 1924

In Mean v. Callison, 28 Okla. … The powers of the board of county commissioners, delegated by Comp. Stat. 1921, sec. 5793, are to be exercised by the board in regular, adjourned or special sessions.