Case law

Johnson v. District of Columbia

572 F. Supp. 2d 94 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2008

Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385, 393 , 102 S.Ct. 1127 , 71 L.Ed.2d 234 (1982); Brown v. Marsh, 111 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.Cir.1985). … Evans, 275 F.3d 1126, 1134 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999)); Mitchell v. Yates, 402 F.Supp.2d 222, 229-30 (D.D.C.2005).

Downing v. Ross

1 App. D.C. 251 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 1893

See also cases of Baltimore v. Gill, 31 Md., 375 , and St. Mary's Industrial School v. Brown, 45 Md., 310, 326 . … See the case of Lord Auckland v. Westminster Local Board of Works, L. Rep., 7 Ch., 597.

Weaver v. Pettiford

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 2014

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) MICHAEL ANTHONY WEAVER, ) ) PETITIONER, ) ) v. … Date: June 19, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. Cafesjian

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2009

AGM&M is governed by a Board of Trustees who serve as the Board of Directors of AGM&M. Id. ¶ 12. Defendant Waters, Jr. is CFF’s representative member on AGM&M’s Board of Trustees. Id. ¶¶ 16, 17, 19. … Brown v. Collins, 402 F.2d 209, 212 & n. 4 (D.C. Cir. 1968). 17 See Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., No. 06-670, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3197 at *53 n.9 (D.D.C.

United States v. Tyrone Vincent Short

570 F.2d 1051 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1978

See, e. g., Gerstein v. … Upon examination of the same picture, this court would label the jacket “reddish brown.” Regardless, Officer Carter obviously was looking for individuals with a jacket of any arguable shade of brown.

In Re Stanback

681 A.2d 1109 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1996

See S.E.C. v. First City Fin. Corp., 281 U.S.App.D.C. 410, 417 , 890 F.2d 1215, 1222 (1989) (citations omitted). … For example, in Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt, 504 U.S. 334, 349 , 112 S.Ct. 2009, 2017-18 , 119 L.Ed.2d 121 (1992), Fort Gratiot Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v.

In Re Temple

596 A.2d 585 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1991

WAGNER, Associate Judge: The Board of Professional Responsibility (the Board) found that respondent, William Jordan Temple, engaged in serious misconduct between 1979 and 1986 in violation of various disciplinary rules which … The Board concluded that the “substantially affected” test was met. V.

Matter of Dwyer

399 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1979

Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938). According to a lengthy opinion of the Supreme Court, Universal Camera Corp. v. … C. v.

Ferguson v. Long

885 F. Supp. 2d 294 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 16, 2012

Cohen v. United States, 650 F.3d 717, 723 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 475 (1994) (citing Loeffler v. Frank, 486 U.S. 549, 554 (1988), and Federal Housing Administration v. … Office of Personnel Management v.

Stephens v. US Airways Group, Inc.

644 F.3d 437 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 2011

See Contilli v. … As Judge Brown notes, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)—“one of the agencies charged with administering ERISA,” Rose v. Long Island R.R.

Jackson v. District of Columbia

710 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 1989

This failure perhaps derives from their citation to Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1244 (D.C.App.1986), as controlling authority for this case. … In Dellums v.

In Re Hopmayer

602 A.2d 655 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 1992

TERRY, Associate Judge: In January 1990 this court suspended respondent Hopmayer from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, pending a formal proceeding before the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board … State v. Kelly, 204 N.J.Super. 283, 287 , 498 A.2d 784, 787 (1985). That constitutes intentional dishonesty for personal gain, which inherently involves moral turpitude.

T.K., Inc. v. National Community Reinvestment Coalition, Inc.

76 A.3d 895 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2013

v. … NCRC’s reliance on Accurate and Brown is misplaced.

Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC v. NLRB

945 F.3d 546 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 31, 2019

The Board did, moreover, “come to grips,” with the conflicting precedent, NLRB v. CNN Am., Inc., 865 F.3d 740, 751 (D.C. … See Can-Am Plumbing, Inc. v. NLRB, 321 F.3d 145, 153–54 (D.C.

MATTER OF McBRIDE

578 A.2d 1102 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 18, 1990

United States v. Kegler, 724 F.2d 190 (D.C.Cir.1984). A leading opinion in this jurisdiction is United States v. Raper, 676 F.2d 841 (D.C. Cir.1982). … E.g., Nye and Nissen v. United States, 336 U.S. 613, 619 , 69 S.Ct. 766, 769 , 93 L.Ed. 919 (1949); United States v. Staten, 581 F.2d 878, 887 (D.C.Cir.1978); United States v. Holder, 566 F.2d 617, 619 (8th Cir.1977).

Nader v. McAuliffe

593 F. Supp. 2d 95 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 2009

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . The court’s resolution of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion represents a ruling on the merits with res judicata effect. Haase v.

Harrah v. United States Treasury Department

503 F. Supp. 2d 385 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 5, 2007

Pending before the Court is [6] Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which was filed by the United States Treasury Department and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. … Erickson v. Pardus, — U.S. -, -, 127 S.Ct. 2197, 2200 , 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, — U.S.-,-, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1964 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (internal quotation marks omitted)).

In Re Demos

875 A.2d 636 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 26, 2005

the Board’s stated intention to seek reciprocal discipline and by failing to participate in the proceedings before the Board. … V It is therefore ORDERED that respondent is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately.

Edward Ford, Jr. v. Charles Massarone

902 F.3d 309 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 4, 2018

Board of Parole was abolished, the U.S. Parole Commission has conducted parole proceedings for both D.C. and federal offenders. See Daniel v. Fulwood, 766 F.3d 57, 59 (D.C. Cir. 2014). … Ford v. Attorney General, No. 02-302 (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2004). Res judicata, however, is an “affirmative defense” that “must [be] plead[ed] . . . in the answer to the complaint.” Brown v.

Auburn Regional Medical Center v. Sebelius

686 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2010

Defendant contends that § 1395oo(f) limits judicial review to a “final decision of the Board,” and that under Athens Comm. Hosp. v. … Hosp. v.