Case law

Opinion No. (2002)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 2002

Bliss Hotel Co. v. Thompson, 378 P.2d 319 , 321 (Okla. 1962). … a written report to the board.

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Pate

441 P.2d 393 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1967

Oklahoma Bar Ass’n v. … In State of Oklahoma v.

Opinion No. 78-243 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 11, 1978

It is well settled that by virtue of Article V , Section 36 of the Oklahoma Constitution, the Oklahoma Legislature has the authority to set county salaries. … Further, the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

City of Tulsa v. Roberts

188 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 1, 1940

To say that it has been adopted because the board has given no expression to the contrary would not do. … The decision in Urquhart v. Ogdensburgh, on its second hearing in this court, illustrates the distinction ( 97 N. Y. 238 ).” Consider, also, Ford v. Des Moines (1898) 106 Iowa, 94 , 75 N. W. 630 ; Brown v.

Fabric Fire Hose Co. v. Town of Afton

95 Okla. 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 23, 1923

Board of County Commissioners v. Clarke & Courts, 12 Okla. 197 , 70 Pac. 212 ; Robertson v. Blaine County, 90 Fed. 63 , 47 L. R. A. (N. S.) 478; Barnes v. Turner, 14 Okla. 284 , 78 Pac. 108 ; City of Sulphur v. … Webb v. Logan, 48 Okla. 354 , 150 Pac. 116 ; Delzell v. Couch, 70 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 361 ; Brant v. Brankle, 82 Okla. 144 , 198 Pac. 844 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. JOHNSON, C.

Alluwee Oil Co. v. Shufflin

32 Okla. 808 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

Garrett et al. v. Walcott, 25 Okla. 574, 106 Pac. 848 ; Baldwin v. Keith, 13 Okla. 624 , 75 Pac. 1124 ; James v. Germania Iron Co., 107 Fed. 597 , 46 C. C. A. 476 ; Wallace v. Adams, 143 Fed. 716 , 74 C. C. … Ed. 800 ; Steel v. Refining Co., 106 U. S. 447, 451 , 1 Sup. Ct. 389, 27 L. Ed. 226 ; French v. Fyan, 93 U. S. 169, 172 , 23 L. Ed. 812 ; Ehrhardt v. Hogaboom, 115 U. S. 67, 69 , 5 Sup. Ct. 1157, 29 L.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 9, 1991

LEDBETTER V. ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LAWS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION, 764 P.2D 172, 179 (OKLA. 1988). THE CARDINAL RULE OF STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION IS TO BEGIN WITH CONSIDERATION OF THE LANGUAGE USED. LEDBETTER AT 179. … A RIGHT TO VOTE IS ORDINARILY INHERENT WITH MEMBERSHIP ON A BOARD. FARRELL V. BOARD OF HEALTH, 276 N.Y.S. 907 (1935).

Opinion No. 72-181 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1972

Special Indemnity Fund v. Harold, Okl., 398 P.2d 827 . … State ex rel Marland v. Phillips Petroleum Company et al, 189 Okl. 629 , 118 P.2d 621 .

Federal Trust Co. v. Spurlock

34 Okla. 644 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1912

This is a companion case to Federal Trust Co. v. Coyle, ante, 126 Pac. 800 , and the facts of the two cases are almost identical. … He further testified that this was the only question that came up with regard to the authority of the board.

Hall v. State

565 P.2d 57 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 27, 1977

. *59 The trial court held an in camera hearing as required by Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967), and Thompson v. … Melot v. State, Okl.Cr., 375 P.2d 343 (1962); however, in the instant case we do not feel that it was required. The question of witness identification has been discussed at length in Commonwealth v.

Ware v. State

71 Okla. Crim. 232 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1941

Williams v. State, 56 Okla. Cr. 245 , 37 P. 2d 658 ; Ellis v. State, 54 Okla. Cr. 295 , 19 P. 2d 972 ; Jones v. Territory, 4 Okla. 45 , 43 P. 1072 ; Ex parte Meyers, 55 Okla. Cr. 75 , 24 P. 2d 1011 ; Hendrix v. … Price v. United States, 1 Okla. Cr. 291 , 97 P. 1056 ; Miller v. Territory, 15 Okla. Cr. 422 , 85 P. 239 ; Kilgore v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 446 , 137 P. 364 ; McCarty v. State, 21 Okla. Cr. 365 , 207 P. 1069 .

Hobson v. Hall

267 P.2d 611 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1954

Under such circumstances as held by this court in Durham v. … Brown, 164 Okl. 139 , 24 P.2d 295 , it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the court may in its discretion reverse and remand the cause

Opinion No. 80-212 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 8, 1980

Title 62 O.S. 371 [ 62-371 ] (1971), provides in pertinent part: "No board of county commissioners, nor city council, nor board of trustees of any town, nor any district board of any school district in this state shall make … United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520 , 81 S.Ct. 294 , 5 L.Ed.2d 268 (1961); Youngblood v. Consolidated School District No. 3, Payne County, 104 Okl. 235 , 230 P. 910 (1924); Stigall v.

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 15, 1999

In Parker v. … See, e.g., Hadlock v. Board of Commissioners of G County, 49 P. 1012 , 1013 (Okla.

Fuller v. Getz

168 Okla. 617 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 1934

And in Baker v. Gaines Bros. … Whitson v.

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co

162 Okla. 68 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1933

Treas., v. Blaine, 149 Okla. 153 , 300 P. 369 , this court, in speaking of a protest involving a levy of 1 mill for a library fund, held: “Chapter 7, S. … Treas., v.

Opinion No. 69-292 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 1969

The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma in Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County, et al. v. … , and such Board does not have authority to deed or lease such land for oil and gas development."

MacKey v. Crump, District Judge

49 Okla. 578 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1915

Austin v. Nalle, 85 Tex. 520 , 22 S. W. 668 [960]; Dallas v. Peacock, 89 Tex. 58 , 33 S. W. 220 ; Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co., 118 Cal. 249 , 50 Pac. 268 ; Meyer v. San Diego, 121 Cal. 102 , 53 Pac. 434 [41 L. R. … And in City of Grafton v. Holt, 58 W. Va. 182 , 52 S.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1990

IN OKLAHOMA CITY V. … NO. 85-058, SUPRA, UTILIZING THE ELEMENTS ENUNCIATED IN OKLAHOMA CITY V.

W. S. Thompson Co. v. Bond, County Treas.

47 Okla. 547 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1915

BROWN, J. This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court, rendered April 18, 1914, on appeal to said court from the action of Henry C. … In the case of McAlester Trust Co. v.