Case law

Coble v. Coble

300 N.C. 708 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1980

Tidwell v. Booker, 290 N.C. 98 , 225 S.E. 2d 816 (1976). … Knutton v. Cofield, 273 N.C. 355 , 160 S.E. 2d 29 (1968); Davis v. Davis, 11 N.C. App. 115 , 180 S.E. 2d 374 (1971).

Vance S. Harrington & Co. v. Renner

236 N.C. 321 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 29, 1952

Kinney v. Sutton, 230 N.C. 404 , 53 S.E. 2d 306 ; Lee v. Board of Adjustment, 226 N.C. 107 , 37 S.E. 2d 128 ; In re Appeal of Parker, 214 N.C. 51 , 197 S.E. 706 ; Elizabeth City v. … County, and that tbe Board of Commissioners shall act as a board of adjustment.

Dearman v. Bruns

279 N.C. 394 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 6, 1971

DEARMAN, Executor of the Estate of Richard Shaw Brown v. Lula Rumple BRUNS, Widow, Individually and as Executrix of Minnie Rumple Brown et al. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 6, 1971. William P.

Commissioners of Raleigh v. . Kane

47 N.C. 288 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1855

Matthews v. Matthews, 4 Ire. Rep. 155; Brooks v. Morgan, 5 Ire. 481; State v. Bill, 13 Ire. 373. … In the case of Regina v. the overseers of Salford above referred to, which was a rule, calling upon the Board of Inland Revenue, to show cause why a license for the sale of beer, granted by a supervisor of excise to one Hague

State ex rel. Everett v. Hardy

65 N.C. App. 350 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1983

Our review of relevant prior cases shows that evidence of results of prior board of elections investigations has been admitted in other quo warranto proceedings in this state. See e.g., State ex rel Freeman v. … See Power Co. v. Winebarger, 300 N.C. 57 , 265 S.E. 2d 227 (1980), State v. Byrd, 40 N.C. App. 172 , 252 S.E. 2d 279 , cert. denied, 298 N.C. 301 , 259 S.E. 2d 915 (1979), Brandis, supra, § 30.

SANDHILL AMUSEMENTS, INC. v. State

365 N.C. 333 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 2011

.; and Old North State Amusements, Inc. v. … Browning, Smithfield, for State of N.C, et al. Kelly Daughtry, for Sandhill Amusements, Inc., et al.

Peacock v. County of Scotland

262 N.C. 199 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1964

In Hinson v. … Field v. Clark, 143 U.S. 649 , 36 L. Ed. 294 ; Provision Co. v. Daves, 190 N.C. 7 , 128 S.E. 593 ; Meador v. Thomas, 205 N.C. 142 , 170 S.E. 110 ; Cox v.

Castevens v. . Stanly County

209 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1935

Reeves v. Board of Education, 204 N. C., 74 ; Evans v. Mecklenburg Co., 205 N. C., 560 ; Hickory v. Catawba Co., 206 N. C., 165 ; Taylor v. Board of Education, 206 N. C., 263 ; Hemric v. Comrs. of Yadkin, 206 N. … Vaughn v. Comrs., 117 N. C., 429 ; Brodnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 ; Haskett v. Tyrrell Co., 152 N. C., 714 .

Henrietta Mills Co. v. Rutherford County

26 F.2d 799 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 13, 1928

Connor v. Board of Commissioners of Logan County, Ohio (D. C.) 12 F.(2d) 789 ; Connecting Gas Co. v. Imes (D. C.) 11 F.(2d) 191 . … Connecting Gas Co. v. Imes (D. C.) 11 F.(2d) 191, 195 ; Connor v. Board of Com’rs of Logan County, Ohio (D. C.) 12 F.(2d) 789, 791 .

Stewart v. . Wyrick

228 N.C. 429 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1947

Nesbitt v. Donoho, 198 N. C., 147 , 150 S. E., 875 ; Brown v. Williams, 196 N. C., 247 , 145 S. E., 233 . … Helsabeck v. Doub, 167 N. C., 205 , 83 S. E., 241 ; Freeman v. Brown, 151 N. C., 111 , 65 S. E., 743 ; Miller v. Lash, supra. Whether the plaintiff might have sued for anticipatory breach when J. G.

Copper Ex Rel. Copper v. Denlinger

193 N.C. App. 249 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 21, 2008

See State v. … Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. Slavin, 147 N.C. App. 52, 60 , 554 S.E.2d 840, 847 (2001). Thus, Board policy 4301.10 is properly before the Court.

Malloy v. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

281 F. 997 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 8, 1922

This view was, upon the facts in that case, adopted by the Supreme Court of Florida in Brown v. People’s Bank, 59 Fla. 163 , 52 South. 719 , 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 608. … Bank v. Floyd, 142 N. C. 187 , 55 S. E. 95 ; Winchester Milling Co. v. Bank of Winchester, 120 Tenn. 225 , 111 S. W. 248 , 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 441.

Jarrell v. . Snow

225 N.C. 430 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 26, 1945

E., 310 ; School District v. Alamance County, 211 N. C., 213 , 189 S. E., 873 ; Harris v. Board of Education, 216 N. C., 147 , 4 S. E. (2d), 328 . … Board of Canvassers, 172 N. C., 797 , 90 S. E., 1005 ; Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners, 178 N. C., 305 , 100 S. E., 698 ; Board of Education v. Comrs., 189 N. C., 650 , 127 S. E., 692 ; Pue v.

Ward v. New Hanover County

175 N.C. App. 671 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 7, 2006

Presnell v. Pell, 298 N.C. 715, 721 , 260 S.E.2d 611, 615 (1979) (citations omitted); see also Justice for Animals, Inc. v. Robeson County, 164 N.C. … (citing Shell Island Homeowners Ass’n v. Tomlinson, 134 N.C. App. 217, 220 , 517 S.E.2d 406, 410 (1999)).

Johnson v. Graye

251 N.C. 448 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1959

Coleman v. Whisnant, 225 N.C. 494 , 35 S.E. 2d 647 . Also, see Bohannon v. … G.S. 1-128; Duke v. Campbell, 233 N.C. 262 , 63 S.E. 2d 555 , and oases cited. The substantial reasons underlying this statutory provision are stated in Love v. Commissioners, 64 N.C. 706 , and in Elam v.

Royster Guano Co. of Virginia, Inc. v. Lumber Co.

168 N.C. 337 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 24, 1915

In S. v. Edens, 85 N. … Abendroth v. R. R., 19 Am. St. R., 461 ; White v. R. R., 113 N.

Associated Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Payne

118 N.C. App. 54 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1995

Accordingly, our review of the Review Board’s order is de novo. Brooks v. Ansco & Assocs., 114 N.C. App. 711, 717 , 443 S.E.2d 89, 92 (1994). … Co. v. Brooks, 73 N.C.

State v. Williams

253 N.C. 337 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 23, 1960

If the Board approves the instructional program and the solicitor, license will be issued. … State v. Mobley, 234 N.C. 55 , 66 S.E. 2d 12 ; Cleaner, Inc. v. Stone, 342 U.S. 389 ; Nippert v. City of Richmond, 327 U.S. 416 ; Text-Book Co. v. Pigg, 217 U.S. 91 , 27 L.R.A. (N.S.) 403; Robbins v.

Jenkins v. City Coach Co.

231 N.C. 208 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 30, 1949

Brown v. Truck Lines, 229 N.C. 122 , 47 S.E. 2d 711 . Moreover, it compels the conclusion that he was keeping a vigilant lookout for vehicles approaching from the opposite direction. … He has the right to assume under such circumstances that the approaching automobile will remain on its own side of the road until the vehicles meet and pass in safety, Brown v.

Campbell v. . R. R.

201 N.C. 102 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1931

Long he got as far as the running board and was caught by the backing train of defendant and seriously injured, losing his leg, which had to be amputated about 3 inches below the knee. … Brown v. Tel. Co. , 198 N.C. 773 -4. The exception and assignment of error as to the jury not answering the third issue, involving last clear chance, is immaterial on this record.